Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 5/2017

01-06-2017 | Research Paper

Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)

Authors: Martin Graversen, Sönke Detlefsen, Jon Kroll Bjerregaard, Per Pfeiffer, Michael Bau Mortensen

Published in: Clinical & Experimental Metastasis | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from pancreatic cancer have a short life expectancy. Systemic combination chemotherapy leads to a median overall survival of 7–8 months. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a treatment alternative, where studies in patients with PM from ovarian, gastric and colorectal cancer show a high safety profile and interesting results. This case study report data on the PIPAC treatment in patients with PM from pancreatic cancer. In a standard laparoscopy, chemotherapeutics (cisplatin and doxorubicin) are nebulized within the peritoneal cavity. After 30 min, the chemotherapeutics are evacuated through a closed system. The PIPAC procedure is repeated every 4–6 weeks. Five patients with PM from pancreatic cancer were treated with a total of 16 PIPAC procedures. All patients received >1 PIPAC and were eligible for evaluation of histological regression. Four patients demonstrated histological regression, and one patient had stable disease. Three patients are still alive, and the median overall survival is 14 months (range 10–20) since the diagnosis of PM. The histological regression and survival figures in this pilot study suggest activity of PIPAC with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin in pretreated peritoneal metastasis of pancreatic origin. This should now be evaluated in prospective studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49:1374–1403CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49:1374–1403CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bjerregaard JK, Mortensen MB, Pfeiffer P (2016) Trends in cancer of the liver, gall bladder, bile duct, and pancreas in elderly in Denmark, 1980–2012. Acta Oncol 55(Suppl 1):40–45CrossRefPubMed Bjerregaard JK, Mortensen MB, Pfeiffer P (2016) Trends in cancer of the liver, gall bladder, bile duct, and pancreas in elderly in Denmark, 1980–2012. Acta Oncol 55(Suppl 1):40–45CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Coupland VH, Konfortion J, Jack RH et al (2016) Resection rate, hospital procedure volume and survival in pancreatic cancer patients in England: population-based study, 2005–2009. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:190–196CrossRefPubMed Coupland VH, Konfortion J, Jack RH et al (2016) Resection rate, hospital procedure volume and survival in pancreatic cancer patients in England: population-based study, 2005–2009. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:190–196CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference House MG, Gonen M, Jarnagin WR et al (2007) Prognostic significance of pathologic nodal status in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1549–1555CrossRefPubMed House MG, Gonen M, Jarnagin WR et al (2007) Prognostic significance of pathologic nodal status in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1549–1555CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL et al (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4:567–579CrossRefPubMed Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL et al (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4:567–579CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lim JE, Chien MW, Earle CC (2003) Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg 237:74–85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim JE, Chien MW, Earle CC (2003) Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg 237:74–85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW et al (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 27:324–329CrossRefPubMed Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW et al (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 27:324–329CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde C et al (2010) Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 7:e1000267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde C et al (2010) Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 7:e1000267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Sudo K, Ishihara T, Hirata N et al (2014) Randomized controlled study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:389–396CrossRefPubMed Sudo K, Ishihara T, Hirata N et al (2014) Randomized controlled study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:389–396CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tabernero J, Chiorean EG, Infante JR et al (2015) Prognostic factors of survival in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Oncologist 20:143–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tabernero J, Chiorean EG, Infante JR et al (2015) Prognostic factors of survival in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Oncologist 20:143–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Bjerregaard JK, Mortensen MB, Schonnemann KR, Pfeiffer P (2013) Characteristics, therapy and outcome in an unselected and prospectively registered cohort of pancreatic cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 49:98–105CrossRefPubMed Bjerregaard JK, Mortensen MB, Schonnemann KR, Pfeiffer P (2013) Characteristics, therapy and outcome in an unselected and prospectively registered cohort of pancreatic cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 49:98–105CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sadeghi B, Arvieux C, Glehen O et al (2000) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies: results of the EVOCAPE 1 multicentric prospective study. Cancer 88:358–363CrossRefPubMed Sadeghi B, Arvieux C, Glehen O et al (2000) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies: results of the EVOCAPE 1 multicentric prospective study. Cancer 88:358–363CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Thomassen I, Lemmens VE, Nienhuijs SW et al (2013) Incidence, prognosis, and possible treatment strategies of peritoneal carcinomatosis of pancreatic origin: a population-based study. Pancreas 42:72–75CrossRefPubMed Thomassen I, Lemmens VE, Nienhuijs SW et al (2013) Incidence, prognosis, and possible treatment strategies of peritoneal carcinomatosis of pancreatic origin: a population-based study. Pancreas 42:72–75CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sugarbaker PH (1998) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for the prevention and treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis. Semin Surg Oncol 14:254–261CrossRefPubMed Sugarbaker PH (1998) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for the prevention and treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis. Semin Surg Oncol 14:254–261CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Solass W, Kerb R, Murdter T et al (2014) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis using pressurized aerosol as an alternative to liquid solution: first evidence for efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:553–559CrossRefPubMed Solass W, Kerb R, Murdter T et al (2014) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis using pressurized aerosol as an alternative to liquid solution: first evidence for efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:553–559CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Solass W, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J, Reymond MA (2013) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): occupational health and safety aspects. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3504–3511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Solass W, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J, Reymond MA (2013) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): occupational health and safety aspects. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3504–3511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Graversen M, Pedersen PB, Mortensen MB (2016) Environmental safety during the administration of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Pleura and Peritoneum 1(4):203–208CrossRef Graversen M, Pedersen PB, Mortensen MB (2016) Environmental safety during the administration of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Pleura and Peritoneum 1(4):203–208CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Blanco A, Giger-Pabst U, Solass W et al (2013) Renal and hepatic toxicities after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Ann Surg Oncol 20:2311–2316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blanco A, Giger-Pabst U, Solass W et al (2013) Renal and hepatic toxicities after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Ann Surg Oncol 20:2311–2316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Tempfer CB, Celik I, Solass W et al (2014) Activity of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: preliminary clinical experience. Gynecol Oncol 132:307–311CrossRefPubMed Tempfer CB, Celik I, Solass W et al (2014) Activity of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: preliminary clinical experience. Gynecol Oncol 132:307–311CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tempfer CB, Winnekendonk G, Solass W et al (2015) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in women with recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase 2 study. Gynecol Oncol 137:223–228CrossRefPubMed Tempfer CB, Winnekendonk G, Solass W et al (2015) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in women with recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase 2 study. Gynecol Oncol 137:223–228CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nadiradze G, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J et al (2016) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin in gastric peritoneal metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg 20:367–373CrossRefPubMed Nadiradze G, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J et al (2016) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin in gastric peritoneal metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg 20:367–373CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Demtroder C, Solass W, Zieren J et al (2016) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis. Colorectal Dis 18:364–371CrossRefPubMed Demtroder C, Solass W, Zieren J et al (2016) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis. Colorectal Dis 18:364–371CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Solass W, Hetzel A, Nadiradze G et al (2012) Description of a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery and the related device. Surg Endosc 26:1849–1855CrossRefPubMed Solass W, Hetzel A, Nadiradze G et al (2012) Description of a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery and the related device. Surg Endosc 26:1849–1855CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Solass W, Detlefsen S, Carr N et al (2016) Peritoneal sampling and histological assessment of therapeutic response in peritoneal metastasis: proposal of the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS). Pleura and Peritoneum 1(2):99–107CrossRef Solass W, Detlefsen S, Carr N et al (2016) Peritoneal sampling and histological assessment of therapeutic response in peritoneal metastasis: proposal of the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS). Pleura and Peritoneum 1(2):99–107CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Takahara N, Isayama H, Nakai Y et al (2016) Intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 for treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer with malignant ascites. Invest New Drugs 34:636–642CrossRefPubMed Takahara N, Isayama H, Nakai Y et al (2016) Intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 for treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer with malignant ascites. Invest New Drugs 34:636–642CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Oman M, Blind PJ, Naredi P et al (2001) Treatment of non-resectable pancreatic cancer with intraperitoneal 5-FU and leucovorin IV. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:477–481CrossRefPubMed Oman M, Blind PJ, Naredi P et al (2001) Treatment of non-resectable pancreatic cancer with intraperitoneal 5-FU and leucovorin IV. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:477–481CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Flessner MF (2005) The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288:F433–F442CrossRefPubMed Flessner MF (2005) The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288:F433–F442CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Jacquet P, Stuart OA, Chang D, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Effects of intra-abdominal pressure on pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of doxorubicin after intraperitoneal administration. Anticancer Drugs 7:596–603CrossRefPubMed Jacquet P, Stuart OA, Chang D, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Effects of intra-abdominal pressure on pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of doxorubicin after intraperitoneal administration. Anticancer Drugs 7:596–603CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Solass W, Herbette A, Schwarz T et al (2012) Therapeutic approach of human peritoneal carcinomatosis with Dbait in combination with capnoperitoneum: proof of concept. Surg Endosc 26:847–852CrossRefPubMed Solass W, Herbette A, Schwarz T et al (2012) Therapeutic approach of human peritoneal carcinomatosis with Dbait in combination with capnoperitoneum: proof of concept. Surg Endosc 26:847–852CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Reymond MA (2014) PIPAC pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy—Cancer under pressure. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin Reymond MA (2014) PIPAC pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy—Cancer under pressure. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin
Metadata
Title
Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)
Authors
Martin Graversen
Sönke Detlefsen
Jon Kroll Bjerregaard
Per Pfeiffer
Michael Bau Mortensen
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0262-0898
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-017-9849-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 5/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine