Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 5/2021

01-05-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Original Paper

In pursuit of equity: partnering to improve breast and prostate cancer outcomes among African Americans

Authors: K. R. Enard, S. E. Nicks, B. A. Campbell, S. M. McClure

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative partnership approach that leverages the strengths of academic–community groups to address local problems. CBPR emphasizes equity (e.g., co-learning, power-sharing, participatory decision-making) among groups to achieve goals and promote sustainability. This study examines group dynamics, and their influence on achieving shared goals, within a CBPR-guided partnership established to improve breast and prostate cancer outcomes among underserved African American communities in St. Louis, Missouri.

Methods

We conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews with key academic and community informants and surveyed via email community collaborators involved in outreach activities. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and independently coded by two authors using an iterative, open-coding process to identify major themes. Surveys were summarized using similar coding criteria for open-ended responses and descriptive statistics for discrete responses. Using a grounded theory approach, we summarized and compared themes from each data source to identify similarities and differences and triangulated results to generate overarching thematic findings.

Results

Participants described benefits from the partnership (funding; clinical, public health and evaluation expertise; training and networking opportunities) and found beneficial ways to leverage the partners’ strengths in collaborating Participants expressed long-term commitment to sustaining the partnership and building capacity to address cancer disparities, but faced challenges related to power-sharing and participatory decision-making.

Conclusions

Using CBPR to address cancer disparities is an effective approach to capacity-building and achieving shared goals. By evaluating the structures and processes within CBPR collaborations through the lens of equity, partners may identify and address challenges that threaten long-term partnership sustainability.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Israel B, Eng E, Schulz A, Parker E (2005) Methods in community-based participatory research for health. Wiley, Hoboken Israel B, Eng E, Schulz A, Parker E (2005) Methods in community-based participatory research for health. Wiley, Hoboken
2.
go back to reference Minkler M, Wallerstein N (2011) Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes. Wiley, Hoboken Minkler M, Wallerstein N (2011) Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes. Wiley, Hoboken
3.
go back to reference Cacari-Stone L, Wallerstein N, Garcia AP, Minkler M (2014) The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: a conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy. Am J Public Health 104:1615–1623CrossRef Cacari-Stone L, Wallerstein N, Garcia AP, Minkler M (2014) The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: a conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy. Am J Public Health 104:1615–1623CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Israel BA, Coombe CM, Cheezum RR, Schulz AJ, McGranaghan RJ, Lichtenstein R, Reyes AG et al (2010) Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health 100:2094–2102CrossRef Israel BA, Coombe CM, Cheezum RR, Schulz AJ, McGranaghan RJ, Lichtenstein R, Reyes AG et al (2010) Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health 100:2094–2102CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Minkler M (2010) Linking science and policy through community-based participatory research to study and address health disparities. Am J Public Health 100(Suppl 1):S81–S87CrossRef Minkler M (2010) Linking science and policy through community-based participatory research to study and address health disparities. Am J Public Health 100(Suppl 1):S81–S87CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wallerstein N, Duran B (2010) Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health 100(Suppl 1):S40–S46CrossRef Wallerstein N, Duran B (2010) Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health 100(Suppl 1):S40–S46CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wallerstein NB, Duran B (2006) Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot Pract 7:312–323CrossRef Wallerstein NB, Duran B (2006) Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot Pract 7:312–323CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB, Allen AJ, Guzman JR (2003) Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds) Community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 56–73 Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB, Allen AJ, Guzman JR (2003) Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds) Community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 56–73
9.
go back to reference Ward M, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Rice K, Martenies SE, Markarian E (2018) A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships. Eval Program Plann 70:25–34CrossRef Ward M, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Rice K, Martenies SE, Markarian E (2018) A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships. Eval Program Plann 70:25–34CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Braun KL, Stewart S, Baquet C, Berry-Bobovski L, Blumenthal D, Brandt HM, Buchwald DS et al (2015) The National Cancer Institute’s community networks program initiative to reduce cancer health disparities: outcomes and lessons learned. Prog Community Health Partnersh 9(Suppl):21–32CrossRef Braun KL, Stewart S, Baquet C, Berry-Bobovski L, Blumenthal D, Brandt HM, Buchwald DS et al (2015) The National Cancer Institute’s community networks program initiative to reduce cancer health disparities: outcomes and lessons learned. Prog Community Health Partnersh 9(Suppl):21–32CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sandoval JA, Lucero J, Oetzel J, Avila M, Belone L, Mau M, Pearson C et al (2012) Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Educ Res 27:680–690CrossRef Sandoval JA, Lucero J, Oetzel J, Avila M, Belone L, Mau M, Pearson C et al (2012) Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Educ Res 27:680–690CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, Tafoya G, Baker EA, Chan D, Chang C et al (2016) Community-based participatory research conceptual model: community partner consultation and face validity. Qual Health Res 26:117–135CrossRef Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, Tafoya G, Baker EA, Chan D, Chang C et al (2016) Community-based participatory research conceptual model: community partner consultation and face validity. Qual Health Res 26:117–135CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Braveman P (2014) What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep 129(Suppl 2):5–8CrossRef Braveman P (2014) What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep 129(Suppl 2):5–8CrossRef
15.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer facts & figures for African Americans 2016–2018. American Cancer Society, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer facts & figures for African Americans 2016–2018. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
17.
go back to reference Braveman P, Gottlieb L (2014) The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep 129:19–31CrossRef Braveman P, Gottlieb L (2014) The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep 129:19–31CrossRef
18.
go back to reference DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Alcaraz KI, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J Clin 66:290–308CrossRef DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Alcaraz KI, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J Clin 66:290–308CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR (2002) Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington, DC Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR (2002) Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
22.
go back to reference Landrine H, Corral I, Lee JGL, Efird JT, Hall MB, Bess JJ (2017) Residential segregation and racial cancer disparities: a systematic review. J Racial Ethn Health Dispar 4:1195–1205CrossRef Landrine H, Corral I, Lee JGL, Efird JT, Hall MB, Bess JJ (2017) Residential segregation and racial cancer disparities: a systematic review. J Racial Ethn Health Dispar 4:1195–1205CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Williams DR, Mohammed SA (2009) Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research. J Behav Med 32:20–47CrossRef Williams DR, Mohammed SA (2009) Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research. J Behav Med 32:20–47CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Furtado K, Banks KH (2016) A research agenda for racial equity: applications of the Ferguson commission report to public health. Am J Public Health 106:1926–1931CrossRef Furtado K, Banks KH (2016) A research agenda for racial equity: applications of the Ferguson commission report to public health. Am J Public Health 106:1926–1931CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Arroyo-Johnson C, Allen ML, Colditz GA, Hurtado GA, Davey CS, Sanders Thompson VL, Drake BF et al (2015) A tale of two community networks program centers: operationalizing and assessing CBPR principles and evaluating partnership outcomes. Prog Community Health Partnersh 9(Suppl):61–69CrossRef Arroyo-Johnson C, Allen ML, Colditz GA, Hurtado GA, Davey CS, Sanders Thompson VL, Drake BF et al (2015) A tale of two community networks program centers: operationalizing and assessing CBPR principles and evaluating partnership outcomes. Prog Community Health Partnersh 9(Suppl):61–69CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Thompson VLS, Drake B, James AS, Norfolk M, Goodman M, Ashford L, Jackson S et al (2015) A community coalition to address cancer disparities: transitions, successes and challenges. J Cancer Educ 30:616–622CrossRef Thompson VLS, Drake B, James AS, Norfolk M, Goodman M, Ashford L, Jackson S et al (2015) A community coalition to address cancer disparities: transitions, successes and challenges. J Cancer Educ 30:616–622CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Dedoose Version 7.0.23, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (2016) Los Angeles, CA, SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. https://www.dedoose.com. Accessed 28 Nov 2018 Dedoose Version 7.0.23, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (2016) Los Angeles, CA, SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. https://​www.​dedoose.​com. Accessed 28 Nov 2018
32.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Poth CN (2016) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks Creswell JW, Poth CN (2016) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks
33.
go back to reference Simonds VW, Wallerstein N, Duran B, Villegas M (2013) Community-based participatory research: its role in future cancer research and public health practice. Prev Chronic Dis 10:E78CrossRef Simonds VW, Wallerstein N, Duran B, Villegas M (2013) Community-based participatory research: its role in future cancer research and public health practice. Prev Chronic Dis 10:E78CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Brown Speights JS, Nowakowski ACH, De Leon J, Mitchell MM, Simpson I (2017) Engaging African American women in research: an approach to eliminate health disparities in the African American community. Fam Pract 34:322–329CrossRef Brown Speights JS, Nowakowski ACH, De Leon J, Mitchell MM, Simpson I (2017) Engaging African American women in research: an approach to eliminate health disparities in the African American community. Fam Pract 34:322–329CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cashman SB, Adeky S, Allen AJ 3rd, Corburn J, Israel BA, Montano J, Rafelito A et al (2008) The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. Am J Public Health 98:1407–1417CrossRef Cashman SB, Adeky S, Allen AJ 3rd, Corburn J, Israel BA, Montano J, Rafelito A et al (2008) The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. Am J Public Health 98:1407–1417CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Adsul P, Wray R, Boyd D, Weaver N, Siddiqui S (2017) Perceptions of urologists about the conversational elements leading to treatment decision-making among newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 32:580–588CrossRef Adsul P, Wray R, Boyd D, Weaver N, Siddiqui S (2017) Perceptions of urologists about the conversational elements leading to treatment decision-making among newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 32:580–588CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Nicks SE, Wray RJ, Peavler O, Jackson S, McClure S, Enard K, Schwartz T (2019) Examining peer support and survivorship for African American women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 28:358–364CrossRef Nicks SE, Wray RJ, Peavler O, Jackson S, McClure S, Enard K, Schwartz T (2019) Examining peer support and survivorship for African American women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 28:358–364CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Vijaykumar S, Wray RJ, Jupka K, Clarke R, Shahid M (2013) Prostate cancer survivors as community health educators: implications for informed decision making and cancer communication. J Cancer Educ 28:623–628CrossRef Vijaykumar S, Wray RJ, Jupka K, Clarke R, Shahid M (2013) Prostate cancer survivors as community health educators: implications for informed decision making and cancer communication. J Cancer Educ 28:623–628CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Smith A, Vidal GA, Pritchard E, Blue R, Martin MY, Rice LJ, Brown G et al (2018) Sistas taking a stand for breast cancer research (STAR) study: a community-based participatory genetic research study to enhance participation and breast cancer equity among African american women in memphis, TN. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2899CrossRef Smith A, Vidal GA, Pritchard E, Blue R, Martin MY, Rice LJ, Brown G et al (2018) Sistas taking a stand for breast cancer research (STAR) study: a community-based participatory genetic research study to enhance participation and breast cancer equity among African american women in memphis, TN. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2899CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Randolph S, Coakley T, Shears J (2018) Recruiting and engaging African-American men in health research. Nurse Res 26:8–12CrossRef Randolph S, Coakley T, Shears J (2018) Recruiting and engaging African-American men in health research. Nurse Res 26:8–12CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Drake BF, Boyd D, Carter K, Gehlert S, Thompson VS (2017) Barriers and strategies to participation in tissue research among African-American men. J Cancer Educ 32:51–58CrossRef Drake BF, Boyd D, Carter K, Gehlert S, Thompson VS (2017) Barriers and strategies to participation in tissue research among African-American men. J Cancer Educ 32:51–58CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Haynes-Maslow L, Godley P, Dimartino L, White B, Odom J, Richmond A, Carpenter W (2014) African American women’s perceptions of cancer clinical trials. Cancer Med 3:1430–1439CrossRef Haynes-Maslow L, Godley P, Dimartino L, White B, Odom J, Richmond A, Carpenter W (2014) African American women’s perceptions of cancer clinical trials. Cancer Med 3:1430–1439CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Brown RF, Cadet DL, Houlihan RH, Thomson MD, Pratt EC, Sullivan A, Siminoff LA (2013) Perceptions of participation in a phase I, II, or III clinical trial among African American patients with cancer: what do refusers say? J Oncol Pract 9:287–293CrossRef Brown RF, Cadet DL, Houlihan RH, Thomson MD, Pratt EC, Sullivan A, Siminoff LA (2013) Perceptions of participation in a phase I, II, or III clinical trial among African American patients with cancer: what do refusers say? J Oncol Pract 9:287–293CrossRef
44.
go back to reference De Lasnueces D, Hacker K, DiGirolamo A, Hicks LS (2012) A systematic review of community-based participatory research to enhance clinical trials in racial and ethnic minority groups. Health Serv Res 47:1363–1386CrossRef De Lasnueces D, Hacker K, DiGirolamo A, Hicks LS (2012) A systematic review of community-based participatory research to enhance clinical trials in racial and ethnic minority groups. Health Serv Res 47:1363–1386CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Komaie G, Goodman M, McCall A, McGill G, Patterson C, Hayes C, Sanders TV (2018) Training community members in public health research: development and implementation of a community participatory research pilot project. Health Equity 2:282–287CrossRef Komaie G, Goodman M, McCall A, McGill G, Patterson C, Hayes C, Sanders TV (2018) Training community members in public health research: development and implementation of a community participatory research pilot project. Health Equity 2:282–287CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Komaie G, Ekenga CC, Sanders Thompson VL, Goodman MS (2017) Increasing community research capacity to address health disparities. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 12:55–66CrossRef Komaie G, Ekenga CC, Sanders Thompson VL, Goodman MS (2017) Increasing community research capacity to address health disparities. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 12:55–66CrossRef
Metadata
Title
In pursuit of equity: partnering to improve breast and prostate cancer outcomes among African Americans
Authors
K. R. Enard
S. E. Nicks
B. A. Campbell
S. M. McClure
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01412-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Cancer Causes & Control 5/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine