Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Care | Original Paper

Care experiences among dually enrolled older adults with cancer: SEER-CAHPS, 2005–2013

Authors: Lisa M. Lines, Julia Cohen, Michael T. Halpern, Ashley Wilder Smith, Erin E. Kent

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Given the associations between poverty and poorer outcomes among older adults with cancer, we sought to understand the effects of dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid—as a marker of poverty—on self-reported care experiences among seniors diagnosed with cancer.

Methods

Retrospective, observational study using cancer registry, Medicare claims, and care experience survey data (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER]—Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [CAHPS®]) for a national sample of fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees aged 65 or older. We included people with one incident primary, malignant cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2011, surveyed within 2 years after diagnosis (n = 9,800; 995 dual enrollees). Medicare CAHPS measures included 5 global ratings and 3 composite scores.

Results

After adjustment for potential confounders, people with cancer histories who were dually enrolled were significantly more likely to report better experiences than non-duals on 2 measures (Medicare/their health plan: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.87; prescription drug plan [PDP]: aOR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.40–0.73).

Conclusions

Dual enrollees with cancer reported better experiences than Medicare-only enrollees in terms of their health plan (Medicare FFS or Medicare Advantage) and their PDP. Better ratings among dually enrolled beneficiaries suggest possible divergence between health outcomes and care experiences, warranting additional investigation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marmot MG, Bell R (2009) Action on health disparities in the United States: commission on social determinants of health. JAMA 301:1169–1171CrossRefPubMed Marmot MG, Bell R (2009) Action on health disparities in the United States: commission on social determinants of health. JAMA 301:1169–1171CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Andrulis DP (1998) Access to care is the center piece in the elimination of socioeconomic disparities in health. Ann Internal Med 129:412–416CrossRef Andrulis DP (1998) Access to care is the center piece in the elimination of socioeconomic disparities in health. Ann Internal Med 129:412–416CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Koroukian SM, Xu F, Dor A, Cooper GS (2006) Colorectal cancer screening in the elderly population: disparities by dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollment status. Health Serv Res 41:2136–2154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koroukian SM, Xu F, Dor A, Cooper GS (2006) Colorectal cancer screening in the elderly population: disparities by dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollment status. Health Serv Res 41:2136–2154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Boscoe FP, Henry KA, Sherman RL, Johnson CJ (2016) The relationship between cancer incidence, stage and poverty in the United States. Int J Cancer 139:607–612CrossRefPubMed Boscoe FP, Henry KA, Sherman RL, Johnson CJ (2016) The relationship between cancer incidence, stage and poverty in the United States. Int J Cancer 139:607–612CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Dahman B, Given CW (2008) Treatment and survival differences in older Medicare patients with lung cancer as compared with those who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. J Clin Oncol 26:5067–5073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradley CJ, Dahman B, Given CW (2008) Treatment and survival differences in older Medicare patients with lung cancer as compared with those who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. J Clin Oncol 26:5067–5073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Carcaise-Edinboro P, Bradley CJ, Dahman B (2010) Surveillance mammography for Medicaid/Medicare breast cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv 4:59–66CrossRefPubMed Carcaise-Edinboro P, Bradley CJ, Dahman B (2010) Surveillance mammography for Medicaid/Medicare breast cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv 4:59–66CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Doll KM, Meng K, Basch EM, Gehrig PA, Brewster WR, Meyer AM (2015) Gynecologic cancer outcomes in the elderly poor: a population-based study. Cancer 121:3591–3599CrossRefPubMed Doll KM, Meng K, Basch EM, Gehrig PA, Brewster WR, Meyer AM (2015) Gynecologic cancer outcomes in the elderly poor: a population-based study. Cancer 121:3591–3599CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kaiser Family Foundation (2015) State health facts: Medicare dual eligibles. Kaiser Family Foundation, San Franciso, CA Kaiser Family Foundation (2015) State health facts: Medicare dual eligibles. Kaiser Family Foundation, San Franciso, CA
13.
go back to reference MedPAC. Dual eligible beneficiaries: an overview. Report to the congress: New approaches in Medicare, Chapter 3, pp 71–94 MedPAC. Dual eligible beneficiaries: an overview. Report to the congress: New approaches in Medicare, Chapter 3, pp 71–94
14.
go back to reference Stefanacci RG (2011) Improving the care of “dual eligibles”— what’s ahead. Ann Long Term Care Clinic Care Aging 19(9):26–30 Stefanacci RG (2011) Improving the care of “dual eligibles”— what’s ahead. Ann Long Term Care Clinic Care Aging 19(9):26–30
16.
go back to reference Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J (2008) The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff 27:759–769CrossRef Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J (2008) The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff 27:759–769CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mollica MA, Lines LM, Halpern MT et al (2017) Patient experiences of cancer care: scoping review, future directions, and introduction of a new data resource: surveillance epidemiology and end results-consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (SEER-CAHPS). Patient Exp J 4:103–121CrossRef Mollica MA, Lines LM, Halpern MT et al (2017) Patient experiences of cancer care: scoping review, future directions, and introduction of a new data resource: surveillance epidemiology and end results-consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (SEER-CAHPS). Patient Exp J 4:103–121CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Halpern MT, Urato MP, Kent EE (2017) The health care experience of patients with cancer during the last year of life: analysis of the SEER-CAHPS data set. Cancer 123:336–344CrossRefPubMed Halpern MT, Urato MP, Kent EE (2017) The health care experience of patients with cancer during the last year of life: analysis of the SEER-CAHPS data set. Cancer 123:336–344CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (2016) SEER-Medicare publications by journal & year. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA National Cancer Institute (2016) SEER-Medicare publications by journal & year. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA
21.
go back to reference Elliott MN, Haviland AM, Orr N, Hambarsoomian K, Cleary PD (2011) How do the experiences of Medicare beneficiary subgroups differ between managed care and original Medicare? Health Serv Res 46:1039–1058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elliott MN, Haviland AM, Orr N, Hambarsoomian K, Cleary PD (2011) How do the experiences of Medicare beneficiary subgroups differ between managed care and original Medicare? Health Serv Res 46:1039–1058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (2017) Medicare CAHPS response rates. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA National Cancer Institute (2017) Medicare CAHPS response rates. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA
23.
go back to reference Martino SC, Elliott MN, Cleary PD et al (2009) Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess Medicare beneficiaries' prescription drug plan experiences. Health Care Financ Rev 30:41–53PubMedPubMedCentral Martino SC, Elliott MN, Cleary PD et al (2009) Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess Medicare beneficiaries' prescription drug plan experiences. Health Care Financ Rev 30:41–53PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (2017) SEER-CAHPS data documentation. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA National Cancer Institute (2017) SEER-CAHPS data documentation. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA
25.
go back to reference Damiano PC, Elliott M, Tyler MC, Hays RD (2004) Differential use of the CAHPS® 0–10 global rating scale by Medicaid and commercial populations. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 5:193–205CrossRef Damiano PC, Elliott M, Tyler MC, Hays RD (2004) Differential use of the CAHPS® 0–10 global rating scale by Medicaid and commercial populations. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 5:193–205CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Halpern MT, Urato MP, Kent EE (2016) The health care experience of patients with cancer during the last year of life: analysis of the SEER-CAHPS data set. Cancer 123:336–344CrossRefPubMed Halpern MT, Urato MP, Kent EE (2016) The health care experience of patients with cancer during the last year of life: analysis of the SEER-CAHPS data set. Cancer 123:336–344CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hargraves JL, Hays RD, Cleary PD (2003) Psychometric properties of the consumer assessment of health plans study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey. Health Serv Res 38:1509–1527CrossRefPubMed Hargraves JL, Hays RD, Cleary PD (2003) Psychometric properties of the consumer assessment of health plans study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey. Health Serv Res 38:1509–1527CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Macias C, Gold PB, Öngür D, Cohen BM, Panch T (2015) Are single-item global ratings useful for assessing health status? J Clin Psychol Med Settings 22:251–264CrossRef Macias C, Gold PB, Öngür D, Cohen BM, Panch T (2015) Are single-item global ratings useful for assessing health status? J Clin Psychol Med Settings 22:251–264CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ware J, Kosinski M, Gandek B (2003) SF-36 health survey: manual & interpretation guide. Quality Metric Inc, Lincoln, RI Ware J, Kosinski M, Gandek B (2003) SF-36 health survey: manual & interpretation guide. Quality Metric Inc, Lincoln, RI
30.
go back to reference Zaborski LB, Zaslavsky AM (2012) MCAHPS Technical Report, appendix 2.04: individual-level weight construction. RAND, Santa Monica, CA Zaborski LB, Zaslavsky AM (2012) MCAHPS Technical Report, appendix 2.04: individual-level weight construction. RAND, Santa Monica, CA
31.
go back to reference Warren JL, Butler EN, Stevens J et al (2015) Receipt of chemotherapy among Medicare patients with cancer by type of supplemental insurance. J Clin Oncol 33:312–318CrossRefPubMed Warren JL, Butler EN, Stevens J et al (2015) Receipt of chemotherapy among Medicare patients with cancer by type of supplemental insurance. J Clin Oncol 33:312–318CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Elliott MN, Haviland AM, Kanouse DE, Hambarsoomian K, Hays RD (2009) Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates. Health Serv Res 44:542–561CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elliott MN, Haviland AM, Kanouse DE, Hambarsoomian K, Hays RD (2009) Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates. Health Serv Res 44:542–561CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Allen SM, Piette ER, Mor V (2014) The adverse consequences of unmet need among older persons living in the community: dual-eligible versus Medicare-only beneficiaries. J Gerontol B 69(Suppl 1):S51–S58CrossRef Allen SM, Piette ER, Mor V (2014) The adverse consequences of unmet need among older persons living in the community: dual-eligible versus Medicare-only beneficiaries. J Gerontol B 69(Suppl 1):S51–S58CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Priest J, Buikema A, Engel-Nitz NM, Cook CL, Cantrell CR (2012) Quality of care, health care costs, and utilization among Medicare part D enrollees with and without low-income subsidy. Popul Health Manag 15:101–112CrossRefPubMed Priest J, Buikema A, Engel-Nitz NM, Cook CL, Cantrell CR (2012) Quality of care, health care costs, and utilization among Medicare part D enrollees with and without low-income subsidy. Popul Health Manag 15:101–112CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Rahman M, Grabowski DC, Gozalo PL, Thomas KS, Mor V (2014) Are dual eligibles admitted to poorer quality skilled nursing facilities? Health Serv Res 49:798–817CrossRefPubMed Rahman M, Grabowski DC, Gozalo PL, Thomas KS, Mor V (2014) Are dual eligibles admitted to poorer quality skilled nursing facilities? Health Serv Res 49:798–817CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Koroukian SM, Bakaki PM, Owusu C, Earle CC, Cooper GS (2012) Cancer outcomes in low-income elders: is there an advantage to being on Medicaid? Medicare Medicaid Res Rev 2:2 Koroukian SM, Bakaki PM, Owusu C, Earle CC, Cooper GS (2012) Cancer outcomes in low-income elders: is there an advantage to being on Medicaid? Medicare Medicaid Res Rev 2:2
37.
go back to reference Elliott M, Swartz R, Adams J, Spritzer K, Hays R (2001) Consumer evaluations of health plans and health care providers. Case-mix adjustment of the national CAHPS benchmarking data 10: a violation of model assumptions? Health Serv Res 36:555–574PubMedPubMedCentral Elliott M, Swartz R, Adams J, Spritzer K, Hays R (2001) Consumer evaluations of health plans and health care providers. Case-mix adjustment of the national CAHPS benchmarking data 10: a violation of model assumptions? Health Serv Res 36:555–574PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
39.
go back to reference Potetz L, DeWilde LF (2009) Cancer and Medicare: a chartbook. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, DC Potetz L, DeWilde LF (2009) Cancer and Medicare: a chartbook. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Washington, DC
40.
go back to reference Elliott MN, Beckett MK, Chong K, Hambarsoomians K, Hays RD (2008) How do proxy responses and proxy-assisted responses differ from what Medicare beneficiaries might have reported about their health care? Health Serv Res 43:833–848CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elliott MN, Beckett MK, Chong K, Hambarsoomians K, Hays RD (2008) How do proxy responses and proxy-assisted responses differ from what Medicare beneficiaries might have reported about their health care? Health Serv Res 43:833–848CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Care experiences among dually enrolled older adults with cancer: SEER-CAHPS, 2005–2013
Authors
Lisa M. Lines
Julia Cohen
Michael T. Halpern
Ashley Wilder Smith
Erin E. Kent
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Care
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01218-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Cancer Causes & Control 10/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine