Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Public Health | Original Paper

Leveraging the strength of comprehensive cancer control coalitions to support policy, systems, and environmental change

Authors: Angela Moore, Aubrey Villalobos, Annette L. Gardner, Citseko Staples, Sarah Shafir

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Strategies that facilitate change to policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) changes can enable behaviors and practices that lead to cancer risk reduction, early detection, treatment access, and improved quality of life among survivors. Comprehensive cancer control is a coordinated collaborative approach to reduce cancer burden and operationalizes PSE change strategies for this purpose. Efforts to support these actions occur at the national, state, and local levels. Resources integral to bolstering strategies for sustainable cancer control include coordination and support from national organizations committed to addressing the burden of cancer, strong partnerships at the state and local levels, funding and resources, an evidence-based framework and program guidance, and technical assistance and training opportunities to build capacity. The purpose of this paper is to describe the impact of public policy, public health programming, and technical assistance and training on the use of PSE change interventions in cancer control. It also describes the foundations for and examples of successes achieved by comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions using PSE strategies.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Stewart S HN, Moore A, Bailey R, Brown P, Wanliss E (2019) Combating cancer through public health practice in the United States: an in-depth look at the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program. In: Majumder AA (ed) Public Health. Intech Open, London Stewart S HN, Moore A, Bailey R, Brown P, Wanliss E (2019) Combating cancer through public health practice in the United States: an in-depth look at the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program. In: Majumder AA (ed) Public Health. Intech Open, London
8.
go back to reference Studlar D (2014) Cancer prevention through stealth: science, policy advocacy, and multilevel governance in the establishment of a "National Tobacco Control Regime" in the United States. J Health Polit Policy Law 39(3):503–535CrossRefPubMed Studlar D (2014) Cancer prevention through stealth: science, policy advocacy, and multilevel governance in the establishment of a "National Tobacco Control Regime" in the United States. J Health Polit Policy Law 39(3):503–535CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Townsend JS, Sitaker M, Rose J, Rohan E, Gardner A, Moore A (2019) Capacity building for the implementation of policy, systems, and environmental change: results from a survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program. Popul Health Manag 22(4):330–338CrossRefPubMed Townsend JS, Sitaker M, Rose J, Rohan E, Gardner A, Moore A (2019) Capacity building for the implementation of policy, systems, and environmental change: results from a survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program. Popul Health Manag 22(4):330–338CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gardner A, Geierstanger S, Miller Nascimento L, Brindis C (2011) Expanding organizational advocacy capacity: reflections from the field. Foundation Rev 3(1):4CrossRef Gardner A, Geierstanger S, Miller Nascimento L, Brindis C (2011) Expanding organizational advocacy capacity: reflections from the field. Foundation Rev 3(1):4CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Leeman J, Calancie L, Hartman MA, Escoffery CT, Herrmann AK, Tague LE, Moore AA, Wilson KM, Schreiner M, Samuel-Hodge C (2015) What strategies are used to build practitioners’ capacity to implement community-based interventions and are they effective?: a systematic review. Implementation Science 10(1):80CrossRef Leeman J, Calancie L, Hartman MA, Escoffery CT, Herrmann AK, Tague LE, Moore AA, Wilson KM, Schreiner M, Samuel-Hodge C (2015) What strategies are used to build practitioners’ capacity to implement community-based interventions and are they effective?: a systematic review. Implementation Science 10(1):80CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) CDC-RFA-DP13–1315: National support to enhance implementation of Comprehensive Cancer Control activities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) CDC-RFA-DP13–1315: National support to enhance implementation of Comprehensive Cancer Control activities.
17.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) CDC-RFA-DP17–1701: Cancer prevention and control programs for state, territorial, and tribal organizations. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) CDC-RFA-DP17–1701: Cancer prevention and control programs for state, territorial, and tribal organizations.
18.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) CDC-RFA-DP10–1017 Demonstrating the capacity of Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs to implement policy and environmental cancer control interventions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) CDC-RFA-DP10–1017 Demonstrating the capacity of Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs to implement policy and environmental cancer control interventions.
24.
go back to reference Fink A (2014) Evaluation fundamentals: insights into program effectiveness, quality, and value. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Fink A (2014) Evaluation fundamentals: insights into program effectiveness, quality, and value. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
25.
go back to reference Gardner AL, Brindis CD (2017) Advocacy and policy change evaluation: theory and practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford Gardner AL, Brindis CD (2017) Advocacy and policy change evaluation: theory and practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford
26.
go back to reference Steele CB, Thomas C, Henley SJ, Massetti G, Galuska D, Agurs Collins T, Puckett M, Richardson L (2017) Vital Signs: trends in incidence of cancers associated with overweight and obesity—United States, 2005–2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66(39):1052–1058CrossRef Steele CB, Thomas C, Henley SJ, Massetti G, Galuska D, Agurs Collins T, Puckett M, Richardson L (2017) Vital Signs: trends in incidence of cancers associated with overweight and obesity—United States, 2005–2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66(39):1052–1058CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Preston M, Mays G, Jones RD, Smith S, Stewart C, Henry Tillman R (2014) Reducing cancer disparities through community engagement in policy development: the role of cancer councils. J Health Care Poor Underserved 25(1 Suppl):139–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Preston M, Mays G, Jones RD, Smith S, Stewart C, Henry Tillman R (2014) Reducing cancer disparities through community engagement in policy development: the role of cancer councils. J Health Care Poor Underserved 25(1 Suppl):139–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Leveraging the strength of comprehensive cancer control coalitions to support policy, systems, and environmental change
Authors
Angela Moore
Aubrey Villalobos
Annette L. Gardner
Citseko Staples
Sarah Shafir
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01215-w

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Cancer Causes & Control 10/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine