Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 10/2018

01-10-2018 | Original paper

Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results

Authors: Simon Craddock Lee, Robin T. Higashi, Joanne M. Sanders, Hong Zhu, Stephen J. Inrig, Caroline Mejias, Keith E. Argenbright, Jasmin A. Tiro

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Effects of geographic program expansion to rural areas on screening program outcomes are understudied. We sought to determine whether time-to-resolution (TTR) varied significantly by service delivery time period, location, and participant characteristics across 19 North Texas counties.

Methods

We calculated proportions undergoing diagnostic follow-up and resolved ≤ 60 days. We calculated median TTR for each time period and abnormal result BI-RADS 0, 4, 5. Cox proportional hazards regressions estimated time period and patient characteristic effects on TTR. Wilcoxon rank sum tests evaluated whether TTR differed between women who did or did not transfer between counties for services.

Results

TTR ranged from 14 to 17 days for BI-RADs 0, 4, and 5; 12.4% transferred to a different county, resulting in longer median TTR (26 vs. 16 days; p < .001). Of those completing follow-up, 92% were resolved ≤ 60 days (median 15 days). For BI-RAD 3, TTR was 208 days (including required 180 day waiting period). Follow-up was significantly lower for women with BI-RAD 3 (59% vs. 96%; p < .0001).

Conclusion

Expansion maintained timely service delivery, increasing access to screening among rural, uninsured women. Policies adding a separate quality metric for BI-RAD 3 could encourage follow-up monitoring to address lower completion and longer TTR among women with this result.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elmore JG (2016) Review: mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality in women at average risk. Ann Intern Med 164:Jc26CrossRefPubMed Elmore JG (2016) Review: mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality in women at average risk. Ann Intern Med 164:Jc26CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Beaber EF, Kim JJ, Schapira MM et al (2015) Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:djv120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beaber EF, Kim JJ, Schapira MM et al (2015) Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:djv120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Taplin SH, Yabroff KR, Zapka J (2012) A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1709–1715CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Taplin SH, Yabroff KR, Zapka J (2012) A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1709–1715CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Oeffinger KC, Fontham EH, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the american cancer society. JAMA 314:1599–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oeffinger KC, Fontham EH, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the american cancer society. JAMA 314:1599–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Goldman LE, Walker R, Hubbard R, Kerlikowske K, Consortium BCS (2013) Timeliness of abnormal screening and diagnostic mammography follow-up at facilities serving vulnerable women. Med Care 51:307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldman LE, Walker R, Hubbard R, Kerlikowske K, Consortium BCS (2013) Timeliness of abnormal screening and diagnostic mammography follow-up at facilities serving vulnerable women. Med Care 51:307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Leung J, McKenzie S, Martin J, McLaughlin D (2014) Effect of rurality on screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mammography. Rural Remote Health 14:2730PubMed Leung J, McKenzie S, Martin J, McLaughlin D (2014) Effect of rurality on screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mammography. Rural Remote Health 14:2730PubMed
7.
go back to reference US Census Bureau (2010) 2010 census urban and rural classification and urban area criteria, percent urban and rural in 2010 by state and county. US Census Bureau, Washington DC US Census Bureau (2010) 2010 census urban and rural classification and urban area criteria, percent urban and rural in 2010 by state and county. US Census Bureau, Washington DC
8.
go back to reference Allen JD, Shelton RC, Harden E, Goldman RE (2008) Follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms among low-income ethnically diverse women: findings from a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns 72:283–292CrossRefPubMed Allen JD, Shelton RC, Harden E, Goldman RE (2008) Follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms among low-income ethnically diverse women: findings from a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns 72:283–292CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Katz ML, Young GS, Reiter PL et al (2013) Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care. Womens Health Issues 24:e155–e162CrossRef Katz ML, Young GS, Reiter PL et al (2013) Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care. Womens Health Issues 24:e155–e162CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Raich PC, Whitley EM, Thorland W, Valverde P, Fairclough D (2012) Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1629–1638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Raich PC, Whitley EM, Thorland W, Valverde P, Fairclough D (2012) Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1629–1638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Dudley DJ, Drake J, Quinlan J et al (2012) Beneficial effects of a combined navigator/promotora approach for hispanic women diagnosed with breast abnormalities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1639–1644CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dudley DJ, Drake J, Quinlan J et al (2012) Beneficial effects of a combined navigator/promotora approach for hispanic women diagnosed with breast abnormalities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1639–1644CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Markossian TW, Darnell JS, Calhoun EA (2012) Follow-up and timeliness after an abnormal cancer screening among underserved, urban women in a patient navigation program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1691–1700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Markossian TW, Darnell JS, Calhoun EA (2012) Follow-up and timeliness after an abnormal cancer screening among underserved, urban women in a patient navigation program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1691–1700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hoffman HJ, LaVerda NL, Young HA et al (2012) Patient navigation significantly reduces delays in breast cancer diagnosis in the district of Columbia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1655–1663CrossRefPubMed Hoffman HJ, LaVerda NL, Young HA et al (2012) Patient navigation significantly reduces delays in breast cancer diagnosis in the district of Columbia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1655–1663CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Paskett ED, Katz ML, Post DM et al (2012) The Ohio patient navigation research program: does the American Cancer Society patient navigation model improve time to resolution in patients with abnormal screening tests? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1620–1628CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paskett ED, Katz ML, Post DM et al (2012) The Ohio patient navigation research program: does the American Cancer Society patient navigation model improve time to resolution in patients with abnormal screening tests? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1620–1628CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Wells KJ, Lee JH, Calcano ER et al (2012) A cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation in improving quality of diagnostic care for patients with breast or colorectal cancer abnormalities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1664–1672CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wells KJ, Lee JH, Calcano ER et al (2012) A cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation in improving quality of diagnostic care for patients with breast or colorectal cancer abnormalities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1664–1672CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Tiro JA, Inrig SJ, Balasubramanian BA, Sanders JM, McCallister K, Halm EA, Bishop WP, Murphy CC, Santino NO, Lee SJC (2018) Clinic variation in colorectal cancer screening in an integrated system. Popul Health Manage (in press) Tiro JA, Inrig SJ, Balasubramanian BA, Sanders JM, McCallister K, Halm EA, Bishop WP, Murphy CC, Santino NO, Lee SJC (2018) Clinic variation in colorectal cancer screening in an integrated system. Popul Health Manage (in press)
17.
go back to reference Lee SJC, Inrig SJ, Balasubramanian BA et al (2018) Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion. Prev Med Rep 9:138–143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee SJC, Inrig SJ, Balasubramanian BA et al (2018) Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion. Prev Med Rep 9:138–143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Krok-Schoen JL, Kurta ML, Weier RC et al (2015) Clinic type and patient characteristics affecting time to resolution after an abnormal cancer-screening exam. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24:162–168CrossRefPubMed Krok-Schoen JL, Kurta ML, Weier RC et al (2015) Clinic type and patient characteristics affecting time to resolution after an abnormal cancer-screening exam. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24:162–168CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Yancy B, Royalty JE, Marroulis S, Mattingly C, Benard VB, DeGroff A (2014) Using data to effectively manage a national screening program. Cancer 120:2575–2583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yancy B, Royalty JE, Marroulis S, Mattingly C, Benard VB, DeGroff A (2014) Using data to effectively manage a national screening program. Cancer 120:2575–2583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Siegl EJ, Miller JW, Khan K, Harris SE (2014) Quality assurance through quality improvement and professional development in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program. Cancer 120:2584–2590CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siegl EJ, Miller JW, Khan K, Harris SE (2014) Quality assurance through quality improvement and professional development in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program. Cancer 120:2584–2590CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Martinez-Donate A, Halverson J, Simon NJ, Strickland S et al (2013) Identifying health literacy and health system navigation needs among rural cancer patients: findings from the rural oncology literacy enhancement study (ROLES). J Canc Educ 28:573–581CrossRef Martinez-Donate A, Halverson J, Simon NJ, Strickland S et al (2013) Identifying health literacy and health system navigation needs among rural cancer patients: findings from the rural oncology literacy enhancement study (ROLES). J Canc Educ 28:573–581CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Richardson LC, Royalty J, Howe W, Helsel W, Kammerer W, Benard VB (2010) Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program, 1996–2005. Am J Public Health 100:1769–1776CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Richardson LC, Royalty J, Howe W, Helsel W, Kammerer W, Benard VB (2010) Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program, 1996–2005. Am J Public Health 100:1769–1776CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Benard VB, Howe W, Royalty J, Helsel W, Kammerer W, Richardson LC (2012) Timeliness of cervical cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program. J Womens Health 21:776–782CrossRef Benard VB, Howe W, Royalty J, Helsel W, Kammerer W, Richardson LC (2012) Timeliness of cervical cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program. J Womens Health 21:776–782CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Inrig SJ, Higashi RT, Tiro JA, Argenbright KE, Lee SJC (2017) Assessing local capacity to expand rural breast cancer screening and patient navigation: an iterative mixed-method tool. Eval Program Plann 61:113–124CrossRefPubMed Inrig SJ, Higashi RT, Tiro JA, Argenbright KE, Lee SJC (2017) Assessing local capacity to expand rural breast cancer screening and patient navigation: an iterative mixed-method tool. Eval Program Plann 61:113–124CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lee SJC, Higashi RT, Inrig SJ et al (2017) County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy: a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2). Transl Behav Med 7:349–357CrossRefPubMed Lee SJC, Higashi RT, Inrig SJ et al (2017) County-level outcomes of a rural breast cancer screening outreach strategy: a decentralized hub-and-spoke model (BSPAN2). Transl Behav Med 7:349–357CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Argenbright K, Anderson RP, Senter M, Lee SJC (2013) Breast screening and patient navigation in rural Texas counties: strategic steps. Texas Public Health J 65:25–27 Argenbright K, Anderson RP, Senter M, Lee SJC (2013) Breast screening and patient navigation in rural Texas counties: strategic steps. Texas Public Health J 65:25–27
28.
go back to reference Robinson JC, Casalino LP (1996) Vertical integration and organizational networks in health care. Health Aff 15:7–22CrossRef Robinson JC, Casalino LP (1996) Vertical integration and organizational networks in health care. Health Aff 15:7–22CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Inrig SJ, Tiro JA, Melhado TV, Argenbright KE, Craddock Lee SJ (2014) Evaluating a de-centralized regional delivery system for breast cancer screening and patient navigation for the rural underserved. Texas Public Health J 66:25–34 Inrig SJ, Tiro JA, Melhado TV, Argenbright KE, Craddock Lee SJ (2014) Evaluating a de-centralized regional delivery system for breast cancer screening and patient navigation for the rural underserved. Texas Public Health J 66:25–34
30.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2016) What is a BI-RADS score? American Cancer Society (2016) What is a BI-RADS score?
31.
go back to reference Battaglia TA, Bak SM, Heeren T et al (2012) Boston patient navigation research program: the impact of navigation on time to diagnostic resolution after abnormal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1645–1654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Battaglia TA, Bak SM, Heeren T et al (2012) Boston patient navigation research program: the impact of navigation on time to diagnostic resolution after abnormal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1645–1654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Tosteson AN, Beaber EF, Tiro J et al (2016) Variation in screening abnormality rates and follow-up of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening within the PROSPR consortium. J Gen Intern Med 31:372–379CrossRefPubMed Tosteson AN, Beaber EF, Tiro J et al (2016) Variation in screening abnormality rates and follow-up of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening within the PROSPR consortium. J Gen Intern Med 31:372–379CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Lee JH, Fulp W, Wells KJ, Meade CD, Calcano E, Roetzheim R (2013) Patient navigation and time to diagnostic resolution: results for a cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation among patients with breast cancer screening abnormalities, Tampa, FL. PLoS ONE 8:e74542CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee JH, Fulp W, Wells KJ, Meade CD, Calcano E, Roetzheim R (2013) Patient navigation and time to diagnostic resolution: results for a cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation among patients with breast cancer screening abnormalities, Tampa, FL. PLoS ONE 8:e74542CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Caplan LS, Helzlsouer KJ, Shapiro S, Wesley MN, Edwards BK (1996) Reasons for delay in breast cancer diagnosis. Prev Med 25:218–224CrossRefPubMed Caplan LS, Helzlsouer KJ, Shapiro S, Wesley MN, Edwards BK (1996) Reasons for delay in breast cancer diagnosis. Prev Med 25:218–224CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Katz ML, Kauffman RM, Tatum CM, Paskett ED (2008) Influence of church attendance and spirituality in a randomized controlled trial to increase mammography use among a low-income, tri-racial, rural community. J Relig Health 47:227–236CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Katz ML, Kauffman RM, Tatum CM, Paskett ED (2008) Influence of church attendance and spirituality in a randomized controlled trial to increase mammography use among a low-income, tri-racial, rural community. J Relig Health 47:227–236CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Gaudet A, Kelley ML, Williams A (2014) Understanding the distinct experience of rural interprofesional collaboration in developing palliative care programs. Rural and Remote Health Gaudet A, Kelley ML, Williams A (2014) Understanding the distinct experience of rural interprofesional collaboration in developing palliative care programs. Rural and Remote Health
37.
go back to reference Whitten P, Holtz B, Nguyen L (2010) Keys to a successful and sustainable telemedicine program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 26(2):211–216CrossRefPubMed Whitten P, Holtz B, Nguyen L (2010) Keys to a successful and sustainable telemedicine program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 26(2):211–216CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference George M, Ngo P, Prawira A (2014) Rural oncology: overcoming the tyranny of distance for improved cancer care. J Oncol Pract 10:e146–e149CrossRefPubMed George M, Ngo P, Prawira A (2014) Rural oncology: overcoming the tyranny of distance for improved cancer care. J Oncol Pract 10:e146–e149CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Texas State Department of Health Services (DSHS) (2011) Policy and procedure manual for breast and cervical cancer services, fiscal year 2012. Austin, TX Texas State Department of Health Services (DSHS) (2011) Policy and procedure manual for breast and cervical cancer services, fiscal year 2012. Austin, TX
41.
go back to reference Post DM, McAlearney AS, Young GS, Krok-Schoen JL, Plascak JJ, Paskett ED (2015) Effects of patient navigation on patient satisfaction outcomes. J Cancer Educ 30:728–735CrossRefPubMed Post DM, McAlearney AS, Young GS, Krok-Schoen JL, Plascak JJ, Paskett ED (2015) Effects of patient navigation on patient satisfaction outcomes. J Cancer Educ 30:728–735CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Schutt RK, Cruz ER, Woodford ML (2008) Client satisfaction in a breast and cervical cancer early detection program: the influence of ethnicity and language, health, resources, and barriers. Women Health 48:283–302CrossRefPubMed Schutt RK, Cruz ER, Woodford ML (2008) Client satisfaction in a breast and cervical cancer early detection program: the influence of ethnicity and language, health, resources, and barriers. Women Health 48:283–302CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Goldstein LJ, Miller BJ, Nicotera N, Pendleton D (2014) Reducing the time from initial call to first appointment: the impact of patient access redesign and a nurse navigation program. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12(Suppl 1):S16–S18CrossRef Goldstein LJ, Miller BJ, Nicotera N, Pendleton D (2014) Reducing the time from initial call to first appointment: the impact of patient access redesign and a nurse navigation program. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12(Suppl 1):S16–S18CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Brett J, Bankhead C, Henderson B, Watson E, Austoker J (2005) The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psycho-oncology 14:917–938CrossRefPubMed Brett J, Bankhead C, Henderson B, Watson E, Austoker J (2005) The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psycho-oncology 14:917–938CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Sheyklo SG et al (2015) Breast cancer screening barriers from the womans perspective: a meta-synthesis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16:3463–3471CrossRefPubMed Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Sheyklo SG et al (2015) Breast cancer screening barriers from the womans perspective: a meta-synthesis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16:3463–3471CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Edwards SA, Chiarelli AM, Ritvo P, Stewart L, Majpruz V, Mai V (2011) Satisfaction with initial screen and compliance with biennial breast screening at centers with and without nurses. Cancer Nurs 34:293–301CrossRefPubMed Edwards SA, Chiarelli AM, Ritvo P, Stewart L, Majpruz V, Mai V (2011) Satisfaction with initial screen and compliance with biennial breast screening at centers with and without nurses. Cancer Nurs 34:293–301CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Peipins LA, Shapiro JA, Bobo JK, Berkowitz Z (2006) Impact of women’s experiences during mammography on adherence to rescreening (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:439–447CrossRefPubMed Peipins LA, Shapiro JA, Bobo JK, Berkowitz Z (2006) Impact of women’s experiences during mammography on adherence to rescreening (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:439–447CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Cole MB, Wright B, Wilson IB, Galárraga O, Trivedi AN (2018) Medicaid expansion and community health centers: care quality and service use increased for rural patients. Health Aff 37:900–907CrossRef Cole MB, Wright B, Wilson IB, Galárraga O, Trivedi AN (2018) Medicaid expansion and community health centers: care quality and service use increased for rural patients. Health Aff 37:900–907CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Sickles E, D’Orsi CJ (2013) ACR BI-RADS® follow-up and outcome monitoring. ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston Sickles E, D’Orsi CJ (2013) ACR BI-RADS® follow-up and outcome monitoring. ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston
Metadata
Title
Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results
Authors
Simon Craddock Lee
Robin T. Higashi
Joanne M. Sanders
Hong Zhu
Stephen J. Inrig
Caroline Mejias
Keith E. Argenbright
Jasmin A. Tiro
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1074-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

Cancer Causes & Control 10/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine