Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Editorial

Epidemiologic paradigms for progress in ovarian cancer research

Authors: Shelley S. Tworoger, Jennifer Anne Doherty

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

In the US, though ovarian cancer is the 11th most common cancer in women, it is the fifth most common cause of cancer death [1]. Despite the development of some personalized novel treatment approaches, survival has not substantially improved, in part due to the late stage at diagnosis in most patients. This decade has marked a very exciting time in ovarian cancer research with the paradigm-shifting understanding that ovarian cancer is not one disease, but comprises a constellation of different disease histotypes with varying etiology and pathways of development, characterized by distinct mutational profiles, cells of origin/ precursor lesions, and histology [2, 3]. As these changes in understanding become incorporated into epidemiologic research, we will make greater progress in reducing the incidence and mortality from this highly lethal cancer. Further showing the importance of ovarian cancer as a public health issue, congress designated funds to review the state of the science of ovarian cancer as part of the Gynecologic Cancer Education and Awareness Act (also known as Johanna’s law). In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control tasked the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to “make recommendations for public and private sector efforts that could facilitate progress in reducing the incidence of and the morbidity and mortality from ovarian cancer,” with an emphasis on advancing research on ovarian carcinogenesis across the cancer continuum [4]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cancer Facts & Figs (2015) Atlanta: American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figs (2015) Atlanta: American Cancer Society
2.
go back to reference Jarboe EA, Folkins AK, Drapkin R, Ince TA, Agoston ES, Crum CP (2009) Tubal and ovarian pathways to pelvic epithelial cancer: a pathological perspective. Histopathology 55(5):619CrossRefPubMed Jarboe EA, Folkins AK, Drapkin R, Ince TA, Agoston ES, Crum CP (2009) Tubal and ovarian pathways to pelvic epithelial cancer: a pathological perspective. Histopathology 55(5):619CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M (2011) Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer-shifting the paradigm. Hum Pathol 42(7):918–931CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M (2011) Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer-shifting the paradigm. Hum Pathol 42(7):918–931CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference IOM. Ovarian Cancers (2016) Evolving paradigms in research and care. Ovarian cancers: evolving paradigms in research and care. IOM, Washington (DC) IOM. Ovarian Cancers (2016) Evolving paradigms in research and care. Ovarian cancers: evolving paradigms in research and care. IOM, Washington (DC)
5.
go back to reference Hartge P, Whittemore AS, Itnyre J, McGowan L, Cramer D (1994) Rates and risks of ovarian cancer in subgroups of white women in the United States. The Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Obstet Gynecol 84(5):760–764PubMed Hartge P, Whittemore AS, Itnyre J, McGowan L, Cramer D (1994) Rates and risks of ovarian cancer in subgroups of white women in the United States. The Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. Obstet Gynecol 84(5):760–764PubMed
6.
go back to reference Li K, Husing A, Fortner RT et al (2015) An epidemiologic risk prediction model for ovarian cancer in Europe: the EPIC study. Br J Cancer 112(7):1257–1265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li K, Husing A, Fortner RT et al (2015) An epidemiologic risk prediction model for ovarian cancer in Europe: the EPIC study. Br J Cancer 112(7):1257–1265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Pfeiffer RM, Park Y, Kreimer AR et al (2013) Risk prediction for breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in white women aged 50 y or older: derivation and validation from population-based cohort studies. PLoS Med 10(7):e1001492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pfeiffer RM, Park Y, Kreimer AR et al (2013) Risk prediction for breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in white women aged 50 y or older: derivation and validation from population-based cohort studies. PLoS Med 10(7):e1001492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Rosner BA, Colditz GA, Webb PM, Hankinson SE (2005) Mathematical models of ovarian cancer incidence. Epidemiology 16(4):508–515CrossRefPubMed Rosner BA, Colditz GA, Webb PM, Hankinson SE (2005) Mathematical models of ovarian cancer incidence. Epidemiology 16(4):508–515CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clyde MA, Palmieri Weber R, Iversen ES et al (2016) Risk prediction for epithelial ovarian cancer in 11 United States-based case-control studies: incorporation of epidemiologic risk factors and 17 confirmed genetic loci. Am J Epidemiol 184(8):579–589CrossRefPubMed Clyde MA, Palmieri Weber R, Iversen ES et al (2016) Risk prediction for epithelial ovarian cancer in 11 United States-based case-control studies: incorporation of epidemiologic risk factors and 17 confirmed genetic loci. Am J Epidemiol 184(8):579–589CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wentzensen N, Poole EM, Trabert B et al (2016) Ovarian cancer risk factors by histologic subtype: an analysis from the ovarian cancer cohort consortium. J Clin Oncol 34(24):2888–2898CrossRefPubMed Wentzensen N, Poole EM, Trabert B et al (2016) Ovarian cancer risk factors by histologic subtype: an analysis from the ovarian cancer cohort consortium. J Clin Oncol 34(24):2888–2898CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A et al (2011) Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. JAMA 305(22):2295–2303CrossRefPubMed Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A et al (2011) Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. JAMA 305(22):2295–2303CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kobayashi H, Yamada Y, Sado T et al (2008) A randomized study of screening for ovarian cancer: a multicenter study in Japan. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18(3):414–420CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi H, Yamada Y, Sado T et al (2008) A randomized study of screening for ovarian cancer: a multicenter study in Japan. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18(3):414–420CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van Nagell JR Jr, DePriest PD, Ueland FR et al (2007) Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened. Cancer 109(9):1887–1896CrossRefPubMed van Nagell JR Jr, DePriest PD, Ueland FR et al (2007) Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened. Cancer 109(9):1887–1896CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A et al (2016) Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 387(10022):945–956CrossRef Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A et al (2016) Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 387(10022):945–956CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schouten LJ, Rivera C, Hunter DJ et al (2008) Height, body mass index, and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(4):902–912CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schouten LJ, Rivera C, Hunter DJ et al (2008) Height, body mass index, and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(4):902–912CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Zhu CS, Pinsky PF, Cramer DW et al (2011) A framework for evaluating biomarkers for early detection: validation of biomarker panels for ovarian cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 4(3):375–383CrossRef Zhu CS, Pinsky PF, Cramer DW et al (2011) A framework for evaluating biomarkers for early detection: validation of biomarker panels for ovarian cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 4(3):375–383CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Poole EM, Konstantinopoulos PA, Terry KL (2016) Prognostic implications of reproductive and lifestyle factors in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 142(3):574–587CrossRefPubMed Poole EM, Konstantinopoulos PA, Terry KL (2016) Prognostic implications of reproductive and lifestyle factors in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 142(3):574–587CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Elwood PC, Morgan G, Pickering JE et al (2016) Aspirin in the treatment of cancer: reductions in metastatic spread and in mortality: a systematic review and meta-analyses of published studies. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0152402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elwood PC, Morgan G, Pickering JE et al (2016) Aspirin in the treatment of cancer: reductions in metastatic spread and in mortality: a systematic review and meta-analyses of published studies. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0152402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Dieli-Conwright CM, Lee K, Kiwata JL (2016) Reducing the risk of breast cancer recurrence: an evaluation of the effects and mechanisms of diet and exercise. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 8(3):139–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dieli-Conwright CM, Lee K, Kiwata JL (2016) Reducing the risk of breast cancer recurrence: an evaluation of the effects and mechanisms of diet and exercise. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 8(3):139–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Schoenberg MH (2016) Physical activity and nutrition in primary and tertiary prevention of colorectal cancer. Visc Med 32(3):199–204CrossRefPubMed Schoenberg MH (2016) Physical activity and nutrition in primary and tertiary prevention of colorectal cancer. Visc Med 32(3):199–204CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Epidemiology Working Group Steering Committee, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (2017) Current gaps in ovarian cancer epidemiology: the need for new population-based research. JNCI under review: NCI Epidemiology Working Group Steering Committee, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (2017) Current gaps in ovarian cancer epidemiology: the need for new population-based research. JNCI under review: NCI
Metadata
Title
Epidemiologic paradigms for progress in ovarian cancer research
Authors
Shelley S. Tworoger
Jennifer Anne Doherty
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0877-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Cancer Causes & Control 5/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine