Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 4/2014

Open Access 01-04-2014 | Original paper

Bilateral symmetry of breast tissue composition by magnetic resonance in young women and adults

Authors: S. Hennessey, E. Huszti, A. Gunasekura, A. Salleh, L. Martin, S. Minkin, S. Chavez, N. F. Boyd

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Some reports suggest that there is a slightly higher frequency of breast cancer in the left breast compared with the right in middle-aged women. The reasons for this association are unknown. The water and fat content of both breasts was compared using magnetic resonance (MR). Breast water by MR reflects fibro-glandular tissue and is strongly positively correlated with percent mammographic density, a strong risk factor for breast cancer.

Methods

Magnetic resonance was used to measure fat and water content of the breast in 400 young women aged 15–30 years and a random sample of 100 of their mothers. All MR examinations were carried out using a 1.5T MR system, and 45 contiguous slices were obtained in the sagittal plane. One reader identified the breast tissue in the image, and subsequently, fat and water content was calculated using a three-point Dixon technique. Left- and right-sided images were read independently in random order.

Results

In young women, mean percent water was on average 0.84 % higher in the right compared with the left breast (p < 0.001) and total breast water was on average 6.42 cm3 greater on the right side (p < 0.001). In mothers, there were no significant differences in any breast measure between right and left sides.

Conclusion

The small differences in breast tissue composition in young women are unlikely to be associated with large differences in breast cancer risk between sides. The reported excess of left-sided breast cancer in older women is unlikely to be explained by differences in breast tissue composition.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Dorn HF, Cutler SJ (1959) Morbidity from cancer in the United States. Public Health Monogr 56:1–207PubMed Dorn HF, Cutler SJ (1959) Morbidity from cancer in the United States. Public Health Monogr 56:1–207PubMed
3.
go back to reference Garfinkel L, Craig L, Seidman H (1959) An appraisal of left and right breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 23:617–631PubMed Garfinkel L, Craig L, Seidman H (1959) An appraisal of left and right breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 23:617–631PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mausner JS, Shimkin MB, Moss NH, Rosemond GP (1969) Cancer of the breast in Philadelphia hospitals 1951–1964. Cancer 23:260–274PubMedCrossRef Mausner JS, Shimkin MB, Moss NH, Rosemond GP (1969) Cancer of the breast in Philadelphia hospitals 1951–1964. Cancer 23:260–274PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Salber EJ, Trichopulos D, MacMahon B (1969) Lactation and reproductive histories of breast cancer patients in Boston, 1965–66. J Natl Cancer Inst 43:1013–1024PubMed Salber EJ, Trichopulos D, MacMahon B (1969) Lactation and reproductive histories of breast cancer patients in Boston, 1965–66. J Natl Cancer Inst 43:1013–1024PubMed
6.
go back to reference Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF, Young JL, Jolly H (1977) Left-sided breast cancer. Lancet 2:762–763CrossRef Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF, Young JL, Jolly H (1977) Left-sided breast cancer. Lancet 2:762–763CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Melnik Y, Slater PE, Steinitz R, Davies AM (1979) Breast cancer in Israel: laterality and survival. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 95:291–293PubMedCrossRef Melnik Y, Slater PE, Steinitz R, Davies AM (1979) Breast cancer in Israel: laterality and survival. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 95:291–293PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Senie RT, Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Snyder RE, Schottenfeld D, Duthie K (1980) Epidemiology of breast carcinoma II: factors related to the predominance of left-sided disease. Cancer 46:1705–1713PubMedCrossRef Senie RT, Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Snyder RE, Schottenfeld D, Duthie K (1980) Epidemiology of breast carcinoma II: factors related to the predominance of left-sided disease. Cancer 46:1705–1713PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tulinius H, Bjarnason O, Sigvaldason H, Bjarnadottir G, Olafsdottir G (1988) Tumours in Iceland. 10. Malignant tumours of the female breast. A histological classification, laterality, survival and epidemiological considerations. APMIS 96:229–238PubMedCrossRef Tulinius H, Bjarnason O, Sigvaldason H, Bjarnadottir G, Olafsdottir G (1988) Tumours in Iceland. 10. Malignant tumours of the female breast. A histological classification, laterality, survival and epidemiological considerations. APMIS 96:229–238PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tulinius H, Sigvaldason H, Olafsdottir G (1990) Left and right sided breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract 186:92–94PubMedCrossRef Tulinius H, Sigvaldason H, Olafsdottir G (1990) Left and right sided breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract 186:92–94PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D (1991) Breast size, handedness and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer 27:131–135PubMedCrossRef Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D (1991) Breast size, handedness and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer 27:131–135PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Senie RT, Saftlas AF, Brinton LA, Hoover RN (1993) Is breast size a predictor of breast cancer risk or the laterality of the tumor? Cancer Causes Control 4:203–208PubMed Senie RT, Saftlas AF, Brinton LA, Hoover RN (1993) Is breast size a predictor of breast cancer risk or the laterality of the tumor? Cancer Causes Control 4:203–208PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ekbom A, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D, Lambe M, Hsieh C, Ponten J (1994) Epidemiologic correlates of breast cancer laterality (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 5:510–516PubMedCrossRef Ekbom A, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D, Lambe M, Hsieh C, Ponten J (1994) Epidemiologic correlates of breast cancer laterality (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 5:510–516PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weiss HA, Devesa SS, Brinton LA (1996) Laterality of breast cancer in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 7:539–543PubMedCrossRef Weiss HA, Devesa SS, Brinton LA (1996) Laterality of breast cancer in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 7:539–543PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen H, Andersen PK, Melbye M (1999) Reproductive risk factors for breast cancer by receptor status, histology, laterality and location. Int J Cancer 81:49–55PubMedCrossRef Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen H, Andersen PK, Melbye M (1999) Reproductive risk factors for breast cancer by receptor status, histology, laterality and location. Int J Cancer 81:49–55PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Perkins CI, Hotes J, Kohler BA, Howe HL (2004) Association between breast cancer laterality and tumor location, United States, 1994–1998. Cancer Causes Control 15:637–645PubMedCrossRef Perkins CI, Hotes J, Kohler BA, Howe HL (2004) Association between breast cancer laterality and tumor location, United States, 1994–1998. Cancer Causes Control 15:637–645PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Smithers DW (1952) Cancer of the breast: A review. Br J Radiol (Suppl 4), British Institute of Radiology, London Smithers DW (1952) Cancer of the breast: A review. Br J Radiol (Suppl 4), British Institute of Radiology, London
18.
go back to reference Cutler SJ, Young JL, Connelly RR (1975) Third national cancer survey: incidence data. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 41:1–454 Cutler SJ, Young JL, Connelly RR (1975) Third national cancer survey: incidence data. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 41:1–454
19.
21.
go back to reference Deaton WRJ, Postlethwait RW, Bradshaw HH (1949) Carcinoma of the breast; with an analysis of 134 cases. N C Med J 10:484–488PubMed Deaton WRJ, Postlethwait RW, Bradshaw HH (1949) Carcinoma of the breast; with an analysis of 134 cases. N C Med J 10:484–488PubMed
22.
go back to reference Antonellis CJ (1954) Carcinoma of the breast. W V Med J 50:178–183PubMed Antonellis CJ (1954) Carcinoma of the breast. W V Med J 50:178–183PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kramer S, Albrecht S, Miller R (1985) Higher frequency of left-breast cancer: a possible explanation. Percept Mot Skills 61:583–588PubMedCrossRef Kramer S, Albrecht S, Miller R (1985) Higher frequency of left-breast cancer: a possible explanation. Percept Mot Skills 61:583–588PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Titus-Ernstoff L, Newcomb PA, Egan KM et al (2000) Left-handedness in relation to breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Epidemiology 11:181–184PubMedCrossRef Titus-Ernstoff L, Newcomb PA, Egan KM et al (2000) Left-handedness in relation to breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Epidemiology 11:181–184PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D, Katsouyanni K, Yuasa S (1990) Age at menarche, age at menopause, height and obesity as risk factors for breast cancer: associations and interactions in an international case–control study. Int J Cancer 46:796–800PubMedCrossRef Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D, Katsouyanni K, Yuasa S (1990) Age at menarche, age at menopause, height and obesity as risk factors for breast cancer: associations and interactions in an international case–control study. Int J Cancer 46:796–800PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Howard J, Petrakis NL, Bross ID, Whittemore AS (1982) Handedness and breast cancer laterality: testing a hypothesis. Hum Biol 54:365–371PubMed Howard J, Petrakis NL, Bross ID, Whittemore AS (1982) Handedness and breast cancer laterality: testing a hypothesis. Hum Biol 54:365–371PubMed
27.
go back to reference McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15:1159–1169CrossRef McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15:1159–1169CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boyd N, Lockwood G, Martin LJ et al (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Breast Dis 10:113–126PubMed Boyd N, Lockwood G, Martin LJ et al (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Breast Dis 10:113–126PubMed
29.
go back to reference Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K et al (2007) Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 16:43–49CrossRef Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K et al (2007) Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 16:43–49CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Diorio C, Pollak M, Byrne C et al (2005) Insulin-like growth factor-I, IGF-binding protein-3, and mammographic breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14:1065–1073CrossRef Diorio C, Pollak M, Byrne C et al (2005) Insulin-like growth factor-I, IGF-binding protein-3, and mammographic breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14:1065–1073CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Graham SJ, Bronskill MJ, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF (1996) Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography. Br J Cancer 73:162–168PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Graham SJ, Bronskill MJ, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF (1996) Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography. Br J Cancer 73:162–168PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Byng JW, Boyd NF, Little L (1996) Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images. Eur J Cancer Prev 5:319–327PubMedCrossRef Byng JW, Boyd NF, Little L (1996) Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images. Eur J Cancer Prev 5:319–327PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Graham SJ, Ness S, Hamilton BS, Bronskill MJ (1997) Magnetic resonance properties of ex vivo breast tissue at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 38:669–677PubMedCrossRef Graham SJ, Ness S, Hamilton BS, Bronskill MJ (1997) Magnetic resonance properties of ex vivo breast tissue at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 38:669–677PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Chavez S et al (2009) Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Oncol 10:569–580PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Chavez S et al (2009) Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Oncol 10:569–580PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Chavez S, Stanisz G (2013) Comparing average breast fat content results from two different protocols at 1.5T and 3T: can the data be pooled? J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/jmri.24452 Chavez S, Stanisz G (2013) Comparing average breast fat content results from two different protocols at 1.5T and 3T: can the data be pooled? J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​24452
36.
go back to reference Glover GH, Schneider E (1991) Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 18:371–383PubMedCrossRef Glover GH, Schneider E (1991) Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 18:371–383PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hahn GJ, Meeker WQ (1991) Statistical intervals: a guide for practitioners. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Hahn GJ, Meeker WQ (1991) Statistical intervals: a guide for practitioners. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA et al (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bilateral symmetry of breast tissue composition by magnetic resonance in young women and adults
Authors
S. Hennessey
E. Huszti
A. Gunasekura
A. Salleh
L. Martin
S. Minkin
S. Chavez
N. F. Boyd
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0351-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Cancer Causes & Control 4/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine