Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Brain Topography 3/2018

Open Access 01-05-2018 | Original Paper

Disentangling Somatosensory Evoked Potentials of the Fingers: Limitations and Clinical Potential

Authors: Konstantina Kalogianni, Andreas Daffertshofer, Frans C. T. van der Helm, Alfred C. Schouten, Jan C. de Munck, on behalf of the 4DEEG consortium

Published in: Brain Topography | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

In searching for clinical biomarkers of the somatosensory function, we studied reproducibility of somatosensory potentials (SEP) evoked by finger stimulation in healthy subjects. SEPs induced by electrical stimulation and especially after median nerve stimulation is a method widely used in the literature. It is unclear, however, if the EEG recordings after finger stimulation are reproducible within the same subject. We tested in five healthy subjects the consistency and reproducibility of responses through bootstrapping as well as test–retest recordings. We further evaluated the possibility to discriminate activity of different fingers both at electrode and at source level. The lack of consistency and reproducibility suggest responses to finger stimulation to be unreliable, even with reasonably high signal-to-noise ratio and adequate number of trials. At sources level, somatotopic arrangement of the fingers representation was only found in one of the subjects. Although finding distinct locations of the different fingers activation was possible, our protocol did not allow for non-overlapping dipole representations of the fingers. We conclude that despite its theoretical advantages, we cannot recommend the use of somatosensory potentials evoked by finger stimulation to extract clinical biomarkers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference de Munck JC, de Jongh A, van Dijk BW (2001) The localization of spontaneous brain activity: an efficient way to analyze large data sets. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:1221–1228CrossRefPubMed de Munck JC, de Jongh A, van Dijk BW (2001) The localization of spontaneous brain activity: an efficient way to analyze large data sets. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48:1221–1228CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference de Jongh A, de Munck J, Gonçalves S, Ossenblok P (2005) Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal to noise ratios. J Clin Neurophysiol 22:153–158CrossRefPubMed de Jongh A, de Munck J, Gonçalves S, Ossenblok P (2005) Differences in MEG/EEG epileptic spike yields explained by regional differences in signal to noise ratios. J Clin Neurophysiol 22:153–158CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Feys H, van Hees J, Bruyninckx F et al (2000) Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 323–331 Feys H, van Hees J, Bruyninckx F et al (2000) Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 323–331
go back to reference Goszczynska H, Kowalczyk L, Kuraszkiewicz B (2014) Correlation Matrices as a tool to analyze the variability of EEG maps. In: Pietka E, Kawa J, Wieclawek W (eds) Information technologies in biomedicine. Springer, Cham, pp 311–320 Goszczynska H, Kowalczyk L, Kuraszkiewicz B (2014) Correlation Matrices as a tool to analyze the variability of EEG maps. In: Pietka E, Kawa J, Wieclawek W (eds) Information technologies in biomedicine. Springer, Cham, pp 311–320
go back to reference Hämäläinen H, Kekoni J, Sams M et al (1990) Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to PS0 and P100 components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:13–21CrossRefPubMed Hämäläinen H, Kekoni J, Sams M et al (1990) Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to PS0 and P100 components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:13–21CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kaas JH (1983) What, if anything, is SI ? Organization of first somatosensory area of cortex. Physiol Rev 63:206–231CrossRefPubMed Kaas JH (1983) What, if anything, is SI ? Organization of first somatosensory area of cortex. Physiol Rev 63:206–231CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kandel ER, H.Schwartz J, Jessel TM (2000) Principals of neural science, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York Kandel ER, H.Schwartz J, Jessel TM (2000) Principals of neural science, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
go back to reference Keren O, Ring H, Solzi P et al (1993) Upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials as a predictor of rehabilitation progress in dominant hemisphere stroke patients. Stroke 24:1789–1793CrossRefPubMed Keren O, Ring H, Solzi P et al (1993) Upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials as a predictor of rehabilitation progress in dominant hemisphere stroke patients. Stroke 24:1789–1793CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kristeva-feige R, Rossi S, Pizzella V et al (1995) Neuromagnetic fields of the brain evoked by voluntary movement and electrical stimulation of the index finger. Brain Res 682:22–28CrossRefPubMed Kristeva-feige R, Rossi S, Pizzella V et al (1995) Neuromagnetic fields of the brain evoked by voluntary movement and electrical stimulation of the index finger. Brain Res 682:22–28CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mauguiere F (1999) Somatosensory evoked potentials: normal responses, abnormal waveforms and clinical applications in neurological diseases. In: Niedermeyer E (ed) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related fields. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore Mauguiere F (1999) Somatosensory evoked potentials: normal responses, abnormal waveforms and clinical applications in neurological diseases. In: Niedermeyer E (ed) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related fields. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
go back to reference Penfield W, Boldrey E (1937) Somatic motor and sensory represenation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60:389–443CrossRef Penfield W, Boldrey E (1937) Somatic motor and sensory represenation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60:389–443CrossRef
go back to reference Penfield W, Rasmussen T (1950) The cerebral cortex of man: a clinical study of localization of function. Macmillan, New York Penfield W, Rasmussen T (1950) The cerebral cortex of man: a clinical study of localization of function. Macmillan, New York
go back to reference Péréon Y, Aubertin P, Guihéneuc P (1995) Prognostic significance of electrophysiological investiga- tions in stroke patients: somatosensory and motor evoked potentials and sympathetic skin response. Neurophysiol Clin 25:146–157CrossRefPubMed Péréon Y, Aubertin P, Guihéneuc P (1995) Prognostic significance of electrophysiological investiga- tions in stroke patients: somatosensory and motor evoked potentials and sympathetic skin response. Neurophysiol Clin 25:146–157CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schaefer M, Mühlnickel W, Grüsser SM, Flor H (2002) Reproducibility and stability of neuroelectric source imaging in primary somatosensory cortex. Brain Topogr 14:179–189CrossRefPubMed Schaefer M, Mühlnickel W, Grüsser SM, Flor H (2002) Reproducibility and stability of neuroelectric source imaging in primary somatosensory cortex. Brain Topogr 14:179–189CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tecchio F, Oliviero A, Pasqualetti P et al (2001) Somatosensory evoked fields in acute stroke. 12th Int. Conf on Biomagnetism. pp 443–446 Tecchio F, Oliviero A, Pasqualetti P et al (2001) Somatosensory evoked fields in acute stroke. 12th Int. Conf on Biomagnetism. pp 443–446
go back to reference Timmerhuis TPJ, Hageman G, Oosterloo SJ, Rozeboom AR (1996) The prognostic value of cortical magnetic stimulation in acute middle cerebral artery infarction compared to other parameters. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 98:231–236CrossRefPubMed Timmerhuis TPJ, Hageman G, Oosterloo SJ, Rozeboom AR (1996) The prognostic value of cortical magnetic stimulation in acute middle cerebral artery infarction compared to other parameters. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 98:231–236CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tzvetanov P, Rousseff RT (2003) Median SSEP changes in hemiplegic stroke: long-term predictive values regarding ADL recovery. NeuroRehabilitation 18:317–324PubMed Tzvetanov P, Rousseff RT (2003) Median SSEP changes in hemiplegic stroke: long-term predictive values regarding ADL recovery. NeuroRehabilitation 18:317–324PubMed
go back to reference Wikström H, Huttunen J, Korvenoja A et al (1996) Effects of interstimulus interval on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) a hypothesis concerning SEF generation at the primary sensorimotor. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:479–487CrossRefPubMed Wikström H, Huttunen J, Korvenoja A et al (1996) Effects of interstimulus interval on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) a hypothesis concerning SEF generation at the primary sensorimotor. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:479–487CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wikström H, Roine RO, Salonen O et al (1999) Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields from the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 110:916–923CrossRefPubMed Wikström H, Roine RO, Salonen O et al (1999) Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields from the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 110:916–923CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wikström H, Roine RO, Aronen HJ et al (2000) Specific changes in somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during recovery from sensorimotor stroke. Ann Neurol 47:353–360CrossRefPubMed Wikström H, Roine RO, Aronen HJ et al (2000) Specific changes in somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during recovery from sensorimotor stroke. Ann Neurol 47:353–360CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Xiang J, Hoshiyama M, Koyama S et al (1997) Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following passive finger movement. Cogn brain Res 6:73–82CrossRef Xiang J, Hoshiyama M, Koyama S et al (1997) Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following passive finger movement. Cogn brain Res 6:73–82CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Disentangling Somatosensory Evoked Potentials of the Fingers: Limitations and Clinical Potential
Authors
Konstantina Kalogianni
Andreas Daffertshofer
Frans C. T. van der Helm
Alfred C. Schouten
Jan C. de Munck
on behalf of the 4DEEG consortium
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Brain Topography / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0896-0267
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6792
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-017-0617-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Brain Topography 3/2018 Go to the issue