Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 3/2017

01-05-2017 | Original Article

Barriers to Implementing Person-Centered Recovery Planning in Public Mental Health Organizations in Texas: Results from Nine Focus Groups

Authors: Amy C. Lodge, Laura Kaufman, Stacey Stevens Manser

Published in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Despite being an established practice in the disabilities service systems, person-centered planning is a relatively new practice in the behavioral health system. As a result, little is known about the barriers that mental health organizations face in implementing person-centered recovery planning (PCRP). To fill this gap, results are presented from a qualitative analysis of nine focus groups at three public mental health organizations in Texas that have been implementing PCRP for at least 2 years. Findings suggest that organizations experienced 12 distinct barriers to PCRP implementation which were categorized into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains of intervention characteristics, the outer setting, the inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and the implementation process. Half of these 12 barriers fell within the inner setting domain, suggesting that implementation efforts should be flexible and adaptable to organizational culture and context. One-quarter of the barriers fell into the domain of characteristics of individuals involved in the intervention, which further suggests implementation efforts should assess the impact that both staff and consumers have on implementation success.
Literature
Aarons, G. A., Wells, R. S., Zagursky, K., Fettes, D. L., & Palinkas, L. A. (2009). Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: A multiple stakeholder analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 99(11), 2087–2095.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Adams, N., & Grieder, D. M. (2005). Treatment planning for person-centered care: The road to mental health and addiction recovery. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Anderson, D., & Factor, A. (1993). Person-centered planning in case coordination (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 357 546).
Brimall, K. C., Fenwick, K., Farahnak, L. R., Hurlburt, M. S., Roesch, S. C., & Aarons, G. A. (2015). Leadership, organizational climate, and perceived burden of evidence-based practices in mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. doi:10.​1007/​s10488-015-0670-9.
Cabral, L., Strother, H., Muhr, K., Sefton, L., & Savageau, J. (2014). Clarifying the role of mental health peer specialists in Massachusetts, USA: Insights from peer specialists, supervisors, and clients. Health and Social Care in the Community, 22, 104–112.CrossRefPubMed
Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pederson, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research, 42(3), 294–320.CrossRef
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Claes, C., Van Hove, G., Vandevelde, S., van Loon, J., & Schalock, R. L. (2010). Person-centered planning: Analysis of research and effectiveness. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 432–453.CrossRefPubMed
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.CrossRef
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. doi:10.​1186/​1748-5908-4-50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Dentzer, S. (2013). Rx for the ‘blockbuster drug’ of patient engagement. Health Affairs, 32(2), 202.CrossRefPubMed
Dowling, S., Manthorpe, J., & Cowley, S. (2007). Working on person-centred planning: From amber to green light? Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 11(1), 65–82.CrossRefPubMed
Everson, J. M., & Zhang, D. (2000). Person-centered planning: Characteristics, inhibitors, and supports. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 36–43.
Groenewald, T. (2008). Memos and memoing. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 505–506). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Hibbard, J., & Greene, J. (2013). What the evidence shows about patient activation: Better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Affairs, 32(2), 207–214.CrossRefPubMed
Hibbard, J., Greene, J., & Overton, V. (2013). Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients’ scores. Health Affairs, 32(2), 216–222.CrossRefPubMed
Holburn, S., Jacobson, J. W., Schwartz, A. A., Flory, M. J., & Vietze, P. M. (2004). The Willowbrook Futures Project: A longitudinal analysis of person-centered planning. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 109, 63–76.CrossRefPubMed
Holburn, S., & Vietze, P. (1999). Acknowledging barriers in adopting person-centered planning. Mental Retardation, 37, 117–124.CrossRefPubMed
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system of the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2008). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). New York: SAGE.
Le Boutillier, C., Slade, M., Lawrence, V., Bird, V. J., Chandler, R., Farkas, M., et al. (2015). Competing priorities: Staff perspectives on supporting recovery. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(4), 429–438.CrossRefPubMed
O’Brien, J., & Lovett, H. (1992). Finding a way toward everyday lives: The contribution of person centered planning (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356 596).
O’Brien, C. L., & O’Brien, J. (2002). The origins of person-centered planning: A community of practice perspective. In S. Holburn & P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Person-centered planning: Research, practice, and future directions (pp. 3–27). Cicero, NY: Brookes.
Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Parley, F. F. (2001). Person-centered outcomes: Are outcomes improved where a person-centered care model is used? Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 5(4), 299–308.
QSR International. (2012). NVIVO qualitative data analysis software. QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10.
Rasheed, S. A., Fore, C, I. I. I., & Miller, S. (2006). Person-centered planning: Practices, promises and provisos. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 28, 47–59.
Robertson, J., Emerson, E., Hatton, C., Elliott, J., McIntosh, B., Swift, P., et al. (2006). Longitudinal analysis of the impact and cost of person-centered planning for people with intellectual disabilities in England. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 400–416.CrossRefPubMed
Robertson, J., Hatton, C., Emerson, E., Elliott, J., McIntosh, B., Swift, P., et al. (2007). Reported barriers to the implementation of PCP for people with intellectual disabilities in the UK. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20(4), 297–307.CrossRef
Sanderson, H. (2000). Person-centred planning: Key features and approaches. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Sanderson, H., Thompson, J., & Kilbane, J. (2006). The emergence of person-centred planning as evidence-based practice. Journal of Integrated Care, 14(2), 18–25.
Schalock, R. L. (1997). A quest for quality IV: Chaos and Cassandras. AAMR News & Notes, 10, 2–3.
Stanhope, V., Ingoglia, C., Schmelter, B., & Marcus, S. C. (2013). Impact of person-centered planning and collaborative documentation on treatment adherence. Psychiatric Services, 64(1), 76–79.CrossRefPubMed
Texas Department of State Health Services. (2016). Number of adults and children served by local mental health authorities in fiscal year 2015. Unpublished raw data.
Tondora, J., Miller, R., & Davidson, L. (2012). The top ten concerns about person-centered care planning in mental health systems. International Journal of Person Centered Medicine, 2, 410–420.
Tondora, J., Miller, R., Slade, M., & Davidson, L. (2014). Partnering for recovery in mental health: Person-centered planning. Oxford, UK: Wiley.CrossRef
van Dam, T., Ellis, J., & Sherwin, J. (2008). Person centred planning: A review of the literature. New South Wales: ACU Consortium for the NSW Department of Ageing Disability and Home Care.
Wigham, S., Robertson, J., Emerson, E., Hatton, C., Elliott, J., McIntosh, B., et al. (2008). Reported goal setting and benefits of person centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 12(2), 143–152.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Barriers to Implementing Person-Centered Recovery Planning in Public Mental Health Organizations in Texas: Results from Nine Focus Groups
Authors
Amy C. Lodge
Laura Kaufman
Stacey Stevens Manser
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0894-587X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3289
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0732-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 3/2017 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Predicting Employment in the Mental Health Treatment Study: Do Client Factors Matter?

Original Paper

Federal Policies and Programs to Expand Employment Services Among Individuals with Serious Mental Illnesses

Original Paper

Barriers to Employment for Transition-age Youth with Developmental and Psychiatric Disabilities

Original Paper

Sustaining and Expanding Evidence-Based Supported Employment: The Role of State Leaders Participating in a Learning Community

Commentary

Extending the Quality and Reach of IPS

Commentary

Individual Placement and Support (IPS): Possible Avenues to Maximize its Potential Benefits