Top

Published in:

01-03-2008 | Original Investigation

Intergenerational contact beyond the dyad: the role of the sibling network

Authors: Ruben I. van Gaalen, Pearl A. Dykstra, Henk Flap

Published in: European Journal of Ageing | Issue 1/2008

Abstract

In this paper we aim to reach beyond the dyadic perspective on intergenerational contact and examine the influence of the sibling network on parent–child contact. We include aggregate sibling network characteristics as well as the adult child’s position in the network vis-à-vis siblings, and use data from the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (2002–2004 NKPS; N = 4,601 dyads). Regarding aggregate network characteristics results show that having sisters, having stepsiblings, increasing geographical distance between siblings, and decreasing levels of network cohesion are associated with less contact per parent–child dyad. Regarding the position of the adult child vis-à-vis his or her siblings, results show that having geographically or emotionally closer siblings has a negative effect on parent–child contact. The impact of differences in emotional distance among siblings is stronger when the analyses are limited to parents in poor health. Suggestions for future research are made.

Coleman M, Ganong L, Fine M (2000) Reinvestigating remarriage: another decade of progress. J Marriage Fam 62(4):1288–1307CrossRef

De Graaf PM, Fokkema T (2007) Contacts between divorced and non-divorced parents and their adult children in the Netherlands: an investment perspective. Eur Sociol Rev 23(2):263–277CrossRef

De Leeuw ED, De Heer W (2001) Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison. In: Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RJA (eds) Survey nonresponse. Wiley, New York, pp 41–54

Downey DB (1995) When bigger is not better: family size, parental resources, and children’s educational performance. Am Sociol Rev 60(5):746–761CrossRef

Dykstra PA (1998) The effects of divorce on intergenerational exchanges in families. Netherlands’ J Soc Sci 33(2):77–93

Dykstra PA, Kalmijn M, Knijn TCM, Komter AE, Liefbroer AC, Mulder CH (2005) Codebook of the Netherlands kinship panel study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships. Wave 1 (NKPS Working Paper No. 4). Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague

Feinberg ME, McHale SM, Crouter AC, Cumsille P (2003) Sibling differentiation: sibling and parent relationship trajectories in adolescence. Child Dev 74(5):1261–1274CrossRef

Fokkema T, De Ruijter E, Maas J (2003) Contacten tussen ouders en hun volwassen, uitwonende kinderen. Bevolking Gezin 32(3):25–54

George LK (1986) Caregiver burden: conflict between norms of reciprocity and solidarity. In: Pillemer KA, Wolf RS (eds) Elder abuse. Conflict in the family. Auburn House Publishing Company, Dover Massachusetts, pp 67–92

Grundy E (2005) Reciprocity in relationships: socio-economic and health influences on intergenerational exchanges between Third Age parents and their adult children in Great Britain. Br J Sociol 56(2):233–255CrossRef

Gulbrandsen L, Langsether A (2000) Wealth distribution between generations. A source of conflict or cohesion? In: Arber S, Attias-Donfut C (eds) The myth of generational conflict. The family and state in ageing societies. Routledge, London/New York, pp 69–87

Hechter M (1987) A theory of group solidarity. In: Hechter M (ed) Principles of group solidarity. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 40–58

Hequembourg A, Brallier S (2005) Gendered stories of parental caregiving among siblings. J Aging Stud 19(1):53–71CrossRef

Hertwig R, Davis JN, Sulloway FJ (2002) Parental investment: how an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychol Bull 128(5):728–745CrossRef

Hogan DP, Eggebeen DJ (1995) Sources of emergency help and routine assistance in old age. Soc Forces 73(3):917, 920p

Houser BB, Berkman SL, Bardsley P (1985) Sex and birth order differences in filial behavior. Sex Roles 13(11–12):641–651CrossRef

Ingersoll-Dayton B, Neal MB, Ha J-H, Hammer LB (2003) Redressing inequity in parent care among siblings. J Marriage Fam 65(1):201–212CrossRef

Kalmijn M (2006) Educational inequality and family relationships: influences on contact and proximity. Eur Sociol Rev 22(1):1–16CrossRef

Kaufman G, Uhlenberg P (1998) Effects of life course transitions on the quality of relationships between adult children and their parents. J Marriage Fam 60(4):924–938CrossRef

Kidwell JS (1981) Number of siblings, sibling spacing, sex, and birth order: their effects on perceived parent-adolescent relationships. J Marriage Fam 43(2):315–332CrossRef

Kunemund H, Motel-Klingebiel A, Kohli M (2005) Do intergenerational transfers from elderly parents increase social inequality among their middle-aged children? Evidence from the German aging survey. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 60(1):S30–S36

Lawler EJ, Yoon J (1996) Commitment in exchange relations: test of a theory of relational cohesion. Am Sociol Rev 61(1):89–108CrossRef

Lawton L, Silverstein M, Bengtson V (1994) Affection, social contact, and geographic distance between adult children and their parents. J Marriage Fam 56(1):57–68CrossRef

Litwak E (1960) Geographic mobility and extended family cohesion. Am Sociol Rev 25(3):385–394CrossRef

Litwak E, Kulis S (1987) Technology, proximity, and measures of kin support. J Marriage Fam 49(3):649–661CrossRef

Lye DN (1996) Adult child-parent relationships. Annu Rev Sociol 22:79–102CrossRef

Matthews SH (2002) Sisters and brothers/daughters and sons: meeting the needs of old parents. Unlimited Publishing, Bloomington, IN

McHale SM, Crouter AC (2004) Sibling relationships in childhood: implications for life-course study. In: Bengtson VL, Acock AC, Allen KR, Dilworth-Anderson P, Klein DM (eds) Sourcebook of family theory and research. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 184–186

Rogerson PA, Weng RH, Lin G (1993) The spatial separation of parents and their adult children. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 83(4):656–671CrossRef

Rohde PA, Atzwanger K, Butovskaya M, Lampert A, Mysterud I, Sanchez-Andres A et al (2003) Perceived parental favoritism, closeness to kin, and the rebel of the family: the effects of birth order and sex. Evol Human Behav 24(4):261–276CrossRef

Rosenthal CJ (1985) Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor. J Marriage Fam 47(4):965–974CrossRef

Rossi AS, Rossi PH (1990) Of human bonding: parent-child relations across the life course. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

Silverstein M (2004) Testing theories about intergenerational exchanges. In: Bengtson VL, Acock AC, Allen KR, Dilworth-Anderson P, Klein DM (eds) Sourcebook of family theory and research. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 407–410

Silverstein M, Conroy SJ, Wang H, Giarrusso R, Bengtson VL (2002) Reciprocity in parent-child relations over the adult life course. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57(1):S3–S13

Spitze G, Logan JR (1991) Sibling structure and intergenerational relationships. J Marriage Fam 53(4):871–884CrossRef

Steelman LC, Powell B, Werum R, Carter S (2002) Reconsidering the effects of sibling configuration: recent advances and challenges. Annu Rev Sociol 28:243–269CrossRef

Stewart SD (2005) Boundary ambiguity in stepfamilies. J Fam Issues 26(7):1002–1029CrossRef

Thibaut JW, Kelley H (1959) The social psychology of groups. Wiley, New York

Tomassini C, Kalogirou S, Grundy E, Fokkema T, Martikainen P, Broese van Groenou M et al (2004) Contacts between elderly parents and their children in four European countries: current patterns and future prospects. Eur J Ageing 1(1):54–63CrossRef

Tomassini C, Wolf DA, Rosina A (2003) Parental housing assistance and parent-child proximity in Italy. J Marriage Fam 65(3):700–715CrossRef

Uehara E (1990) Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. Am J Sociol 96(3):521–557CrossRef

Uhlenberg P, Cooney TM (1990) Family size and mother-child relations. Gerontologist 30(5):618–625

Voorpostel M (2007) Siblings support: the exchange of help among brothers and sisters in the Netherlands. Utrecht University (ICS Dissertation), Utrecht

Widmer ED, La Farga L-A (2000) Family networks: a sociometric method to study relationships in families. Field Methods 12(2):108–128CrossRef

Zvoch K (1999) Family type and investment in education: a comparison of genetic and stepparent families. Evol Human Behav 20(6):453–464CrossRef

Title: Intergenerational contact beyond the dyad: the role of the sibling network
Authors: Ruben I. van Gaalen
Pearl A. Dykstra
Henk Flap
Publication date: 01-03-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Journal of Ageing / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 1613-9372
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9380
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-008-0076-6

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Intergenerational contact beyond the dyad: the role of the sibling network

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Future trends in health and marital status: effects on the structure of living arrangements of older Europeans in 2030

The suitability of the WHOQOL–BREF for Canadian and Norwegian older adults

Home help services in Sweden: responsiveness to changing demographics and needs

Case management method applied to older adults in the primary care centres in Burjassot (Valencian Region, Spain)

Innovations in research on social contexts of ageing

Children’s impact on the mental health of their older mothers and fathers: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe