Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gynecological Surgery 4/2014

01-11-2014 | Original Article

Tailor-made proficiency curves in laparoscopic hysterectomy: enhancing patient safety using CUSUM analysis

Authors: A. R. H. Twijnstra, M. D. Blikkendaal, S. R. C. Driessen, E. W. van Zwet, C. D. de Kroon, F. W. Jansen

Published in: Gynecological Surgery | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop a risk-adjusted real-time quality control system in laparoscopic hysterectomy with respect to blood loss, operative time and adverse events in order to signal derailing surgical performance in a timely fashion. Based on prior research, uterus weight, body mass index, number of surgeons, prior abdominal surgery, and type of laparoscopic hysterectomy were identified as significant covariates predicting successful surgical outcome. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, a model based on dichotomous input (success or “failure”), was selected as a predictive tool for performance analysis. Cutoff values were set at blood loss <200 mL and operative time <120 min and no adverse event. Risk-adjusted CUSUM graphs were constructed. In order to detect progressive failure rates (odds ratio 2.0 compared to average) in surgical performance (for blood loss, operative time, and adverse events) within 20 procedures, as a result, surgeons with average clinical outcomes will be flagged once in every 70–75 procedures (median) without justified derailing performance. With proposed validated and risk-adjusted CUSUM graphs, gynecologists are able to continuously monitor their surgical performance in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Consequently, this identifies suboptimal factors, which allow improvement of their surgical outcomes (by means of adjustment) and further enhancement of patient safety.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Treasure T (2000) Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. Biostatistics 1(4):441–452PubMedCrossRef Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Treasure T (2000) Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. Biostatistics 1(4):441–452PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Biau DJ, Resche-Rigon M, Godiris-Petit G, Nizard RS, Porcher R (2007) Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM. Qual Saf Health Care 16(3):203–207PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Biau DJ, Resche-Rigon M, Godiris-Petit G, Nizard RS, Porcher R (2007) Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM. Qual Saf Health Care 16(3):203–207PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Twijnstra AR, Blikkendaal MD, van Zwet EW, van Kesteren PJ, de Kroon CD, Jansen FW (2012) Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 119(4):700–708PubMedCrossRef Twijnstra AR, Blikkendaal MD, van Zwet EW, van Kesteren PJ, de Kroon CD, Jansen FW (2012) Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 119(4):700–708PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23(4):839–846PubMedCrossRef Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23(4):839–846PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cheng JM, Duan H, Wang JJ, Zhang HT, Liu Y (2007) Clinical analysis of conversion from gynecological laparoscopic surgery to laparotomy. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 42(3):173–175PubMed Cheng JM, Duan H, Wang JJ, Zhang HT, Liu Y (2007) Clinical analysis of conversion from gynecological laparoscopic surgery to laparotomy. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 42(3):173–175PubMed
7.
go back to reference Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E (1999) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod 14(12):2996–2999PubMedCrossRef Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E (1999) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod 14(12):2996–2999PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R et al (2002) The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9(3):339–345PubMedCrossRef Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R et al (2002) The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9(3):339–345PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leminen A (2000) Comparison between personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79(12):1100–1104PubMedCrossRef Leminen A (2000) Comparison between personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79(12):1100–1104PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Altgassen C, Michels W, Schneider A (2004) Learning laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 104(2):308–313PubMedCrossRef Altgassen C, Michels W, Schneider A (2004) Learning laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 104(2):308–313PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference de Saintonge DM, Vere DW (1974) Why don't doctors use CUSUMs? Lancet 1:120–121 de Saintonge DM, Vere DW (1974) Why don't doctors use CUSUMs? Lancet 1:120–121
12.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):217–222PubMedCrossRef Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):217–222PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bolsin S, Colson M (2000) The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12(5):433–438PubMedCrossRef Bolsin S, Colson M (2000) The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12(5):433–438PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weerasinghe S, Mirghani H, Revel A, bu-Zidan FM (2006) Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis in the assessment of trainee competence in fetal biometry measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(2):199–203PubMedCrossRef Weerasinghe S, Mirghani H, Revel A, bu-Zidan FM (2006) Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis in the assessment of trainee competence in fetal biometry measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(2):199–203PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Boulkedid R, Sibony O, Bossu-Salvador C, Oury JF, Alberti C (2010) Monitoring healthcare quality in an obstetrics and gynaecology department using a CUSUM chart. BJOG Boulkedid R, Sibony O, Bossu-Salvador C, Oury JF, Alberti C (2010) Monitoring healthcare quality in an obstetrics and gynaecology department using a CUSUM chart. BJOG
16.
go back to reference Lindenburg IT, Wolterbeek R, Oepkes D, Klumper FJ, Vandenbussche FP, van Kamp IL (2011) Quality control for intravascular intrauterine transfusion using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis for the monitoring of individual performance. Fetal Diagn Ther 29(4):307–314PubMedCrossRef Lindenburg IT, Wolterbeek R, Oepkes D, Klumper FJ, Vandenbussche FP, van Kamp IL (2011) Quality control for intravascular intrauterine transfusion using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis for the monitoring of individual performance. Fetal Diagn Ther 29(4):307–314PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT (2001) Risk-adjusted monitoring of binary surgical outcomes. Med Dec Making 21(3):163–169CrossRef Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT (2001) Risk-adjusted monitoring of binary surgical outcomes. Med Dec Making 21(3):163–169CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Grigg OA, Farewell VT, Spiegelhalter DJ (2003) Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts. Stat Methods Med Res 12(2):147–170PubMed Grigg OA, Farewell VT, Spiegelhalter DJ (2003) Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts. Stat Methods Med Res 12(2):147–170PubMed
19.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91(12):1549–1558PubMedCrossRef Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91(12):1549–1558PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schijven MP, Jakimowicz J (2004) The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance. Surg Endosc 18(1):121–127PubMedCrossRef Schijven MP, Jakimowicz J (2004) The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance. Surg Endosc 18(1):121–127PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Landheer ML, Therasse P, van de Velde CJ (2002) The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol 28(6):571–602PubMedCrossRef Landheer ML, Therasse P, van de Velde CJ (2002) The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol 28(6):571–602PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ (2003) Surgical quality assurance in breast, gastric and rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 84(3):107–112PubMedCrossRef Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ (2003) Surgical quality assurance in breast, gastric and rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 84(3):107–112PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Verleye L, Vergote I, Reed N, Ottevanger PB (2009) Quality assurance for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the view of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG). Ann Oncol 20(10):1631–1638PubMedCrossRef Verleye L, Vergote I, Reed N, Ottevanger PB (2009) Quality assurance for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the view of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG). Ann Oncol 20(10):1631–1638PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tailor-made proficiency curves in laparoscopic hysterectomy: enhancing patient safety using CUSUM analysis
Authors
A. R. H. Twijnstra
M. D. Blikkendaal
S. R. C. Driessen
E. W. van Zwet
C. D. de Kroon
F. W. Jansen
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Gynecological Surgery / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-014-0866-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Gynecological Surgery 4/2014 Go to the issue

Editorial Comment

Editorial comment