Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gynecological Surgery 2/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

Posterior intravaginal slingplasty for vault and uterovaginal prolapse: an initial experience

Authors: R. Oliver, C. Dasgupta, A. Coker

Published in: Gynecological Surgery | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Genital prolapse surgeries are traditionally time-consuming and can be complex with significant morbidity. Most of the techniques described have incorporated removal of the prolapsed uterus prior to the repair, thus increasing morbidity and hospital stay. Recently, interest has been focused on minimally invasive day-case techniques, which have similar success rates but relatively lower morbidity than the conventional surgeries. We report an initial experience of 14 cases of vault and uterovaginal prolapse treated with the intravaginal slingplasty procedure. This study involved retrospective analyses of the case notes as well as evaluation by contemporary patient questionnaire. In our series we used a modified technique to correct uterovaginal prolapse without performing a hysterectomy. The cure rates in vault and uterovaginal prolapses were statistically significant, and the complication rates were minimal, facilitating a short hospital stay. Hence, the procedure was equally successful in women who had undergone hysterectomy and women with an intact uterus. We conclude that intravaginal slingplasty is minimally invasive and safe, with a high cure rate and high patient satisfaction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marcus PC, Dwyer PL (2001) Genital prolapse: vaginal versus abdominal route of repair. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 3(5):499–505 Marcus PC, Dwyer PL (2001) Genital prolapse: vaginal versus abdominal route of repair. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 3(5):499–505
2.
go back to reference Petros PE (1997) New ambulatory surgical methods using an anatomical classification of urinary dysfunction improve stress, urge and abnormal emptying. Int Urogynecol J 8:270–278CrossRef Petros PE (1997) New ambulatory surgical methods using an anatomical classification of urinary dysfunction improve stress, urge and abnormal emptying. Int Urogynecol J 8:270–278CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinée S et al (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897CrossRefPubMed Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinée S et al (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference De Lancey JOL (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1717–1728PubMed De Lancey JOL (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1717–1728PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP (1996) Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal sacropexy: success rates and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 75:612–616CrossRef Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP (1996) Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal sacropexy: success rates and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 75:612–616CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Petros PP (2001) Vault prolapse II: restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J 12:296–303CrossRef Petros PP (2001) Vault prolapse II: restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J 12:296–303CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Posterior intravaginal slingplasty for vault and uterovaginal prolapse: an initial experience
Authors
R. Oliver
C. Dasgupta
A. Coker
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Gynecological Surgery / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-005-0168-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Gynecological Surgery 2/2006 Go to the issue

ESGE Newsletter

ESGE Newsletter