Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Original Article

Usefulness of antenatal ultrasound fetal morphological assessments in the first and second trimester: a study at a single Japanese university hospital

Authors: Hiroko Takita, Junichi Hasegawa, Tatsuya Arakaki, Masamitsu Nakamura, Shoko Hamada, Mayumi Tokunaka, Tomohiro Oba, Ryu Matsuoka, Akihiko Sekizawa

Published in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess the usefulness of antenatal ultrasound examinations for detecting fetal morphological abnormalities in the first and second trimesters.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted at a single Japanese university hospital in the period from February 2011 to September 2013. Patients in whom ultrasound was attempted at both 11 to 13 + 6 and 18 to 20 + 6 weeks’ gestation and who were delivered at our hospital were enrolled. After delivery, neonatal congenital abnormalities were reviewed and compared with the ultrasound findings in the first and second trimesters.

Results

The subjects were 2028 singleton babies. Abnormal fetal morphological findings were found in the first trimester in 28 cases. In these patients, fetal anomalies detected as diagnostic findings were anencephaly (2 cases) and endocardial cushion defect (2 cases). Findings suggestive of fetal anomalies were observed in 24 cases in the first trimester. Twelve cases with ultrasound findings in the first trimester, including fetal edema, anencephaly, endocardial cushion defect, exhibited an abnormal chromosome after amniocentesis. Ultrasound findings in the first trimester disappeared until 18 weeks of gestation in eight cases, and they were preserved in three cases. Fetal anomalies were primarily noted in the second trimester in 10 cases. However, after delivery, morphological abnormalities were primarily observed in 18 cases.

Conclusion

Major congenital abnormalities were identified in the first trimester morphological assessment. We think the use of a combination of the first trimester ultrasound screening and the second trimester ultrasound scan for detecting fetal anomalies was effective.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chandrasekaran N, Viswanatha R, Bhide A. Ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2013;23:101–7.CrossRef Chandrasekaran N, Viswanatha R, Bhide A. Ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2013;23:101–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Souka AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis I, et al. Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11- to 14-week ultrasound scan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:393–6.PubMedCrossRef Souka AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis I, et al. Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11- to 14-week ultrasound scan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:393–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Luchi C, Schifano M, Sacchini C, et al. Detailed fetal anatomy assessment in the first trimester at 11, 12 and 13 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:675–8.PubMedCrossRef Luchi C, Schifano M, Sacchini C, et al. Detailed fetal anatomy assessment in the first trimester at 11, 12 and 13 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:675–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Souka AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis Y, et al. Assessment of fetal anatomy at the 11-14-week ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:730–4.PubMedCrossRef Souka AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis Y, et al. Assessment of fetal anatomy at the 11-14-week ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:730–4.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schwarzler P, Senat MV, Holden D, et al. Feasibility of the second-trimester fetal ultrasound examination in an unselected population at 18, 20 or 22 weeks of pregnancy: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:92–7.PubMedCrossRef Schwarzler P, Senat MV, Holden D, et al. Feasibility of the second-trimester fetal ultrasound examination in an unselected population at 18, 20 or 22 weeks of pregnancy: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:92–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chandrasekaran N, Viswanatha R, Bhide A. Ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis of structural abnormalities Obstetrics. Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2013;23:101–7.CrossRef Chandrasekaran N, Viswanatha R, Bhide A. Ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis of structural abnormalities Obstetrics. Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2013;23:101–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Syngelaki A, Chelemen T, Dagklis T, et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:90–102.PubMedCrossRef Syngelaki A, Chelemen T, Dagklis T, et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:90–102.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grande M, Arigita M, Borobio V, et al. First-trimester detection of structural abnormalities and the role of aneuploidy markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:157–63.PubMedCrossRef Grande M, Arigita M, Borobio V, et al. First-trimester detection of structural abnormalities and the role of aneuploidy markers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:157–63.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pilalis A, Basagiannis C, Eleftheriades M, et al. Evaluation of a two-step ultrasound examination protocol for the detection of major fetal structural defects. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:1814–7.PubMedCrossRef Pilalis A, Basagiannis C, Eleftheriades M, et al. Evaluation of a two-step ultrasound examination protocol for the detection of major fetal structural defects. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:1814–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nielsen DE, Vejlstrup N, Jorgensen C, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease in a low risk population undergoing first and second trimester screening. Prenat Diagn. 2014;35:325–30. Nielsen DE, Vejlstrup N, Jorgensen C, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease in a low risk population undergoing first and second trimester screening. Prenat Diagn. 2014;35:325–30.
11.
go back to reference Meizner I. The ‘tulip sign’: a sonographic clue for in utero diagnosis of severe hypospadias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:317.PubMedCrossRef Meizner I. The ‘tulip sign’: a sonographic clue for in utero diagnosis of severe hypospadias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:317.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bezuska L, Mussa S, Muthialu N. Chest wall reconstruction in Marfan syndrome following aortic root replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2014;22:872–4.PubMedCrossRef Bezuska L, Mussa S, Muthialu N. Chest wall reconstruction in Marfan syndrome following aortic root replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2014;22:872–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Usefulness of antenatal ultrasound fetal morphological assessments in the first and second trimester: a study at a single Japanese university hospital
Authors
Hiroko Takita
Junichi Hasegawa
Tatsuya Arakaki
Masamitsu Nakamura
Shoko Hamada
Mayumi Tokunaka
Tomohiro Oba
Ryu Matsuoka
Akihiko Sekizawa
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1346-4523
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0653-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 1/2016 Go to the issue