Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Public Health 2/2006

01-04-2006 | Review Article

Methodology of physical-activity and energy-expenditure assessment: a review

Authors: E. M. Valanou, C. Bamia, A. Trichopoulou

Published in: Journal of Public Health | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Over the last decades, substantial epidemiological evidence has been accumulated on the protective role of increased physical activity (PA) for the prevention and management of certain chronic diseases. To better address the impact of physical activity on health, valid and reliable instruments for its measurement are essential. Because of its dimensionality, a large number of methods exist for the assessment of various aspects of physical activity. This review provides a summary of available tools for measuring physical activity and total energy expenditure (TEE) and addresses their advantages and limitations in assessing PA in epidemiological surveys. The selection of the appropriate method for a specific survey should be based on criteria such as experimental goals, sample size, budget, cultural and social/environmental factors, physical burden for the subject, and statistical factors such as validity and reliability. The instruments that are very precise in measuring total energy expenditure such as doubly-labeled water method and direct and indirect calorimetry tend to be impractical on a population basis. On the other hand, methods such as self-report techniques are applicable for epidemiological studies, but they lack accuracy in measuring energy expenditure (EE).
Footnotes
1
The metabolic equivalent (MET) represents the ratio of energy expended in (KJ or Kcal) divided by resting energy expenditure (KJ or Kcal). For each activity, a MET value has been assigned that characterizes its intensity. One MET is considered to represent resting energy expenditure, or approximately 3.5 ml kg−1 min−1 in terms of oxygen consumption.
 
2
RMR represents the amount of energy expended under restful conditions. RMR is approximately 10% higher than BMR
 
Literature
go back to reference Ainslie PN, Reilly T, Westerterp KR (2003) Estimating energy expenditure. A review of techniques with particular reference to double labeled water. Sports Med 33:683–698CrossRefPubMed Ainslie PN, Reilly T, Westerterp KR (2003) Estimating energy expenditure. A review of techniques with particular reference to double labeled water. Sports Med 33:683–698CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ainsworth BE (1997) A collection of physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:S59–S61 Ainsworth BE (1997) A collection of physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:S59–S61
go back to reference Ainsworth BE, Sternfeld B, Richardson MT, Jackson K (2000) Evaluation of the Kaiser physical activity survey in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1327–1338CrossRefPubMed Ainsworth BE, Sternfeld B, Richardson MT, Jackson K (2000) Evaluation of the Kaiser physical activity survey in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1327–1338CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bassett DR (2000) Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:30–36 Bassett DR (2000) Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:30–36
go back to reference Bassett DR Jr, BE, Leggett SR, Mathien CA, Main JA, Hunter DC, Duncan GE (1996) Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:1071–1077PubMed Bassett DR Jr, BE, Leggett SR, Mathien CA, Main JA, Hunter DC, Duncan GE (1996) Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:1071–1077PubMed
go back to reference Bassett DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’ Brien WL, King GA (2000) Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S471–S480CrossRefPubMed Bassett DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’ Brien WL, King GA (2000) Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S471–S480CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bauman AE (2004) Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000–2003. J Sci Med Sport 1:6–19CrossRef Bauman AE (2004) Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000–2003. J Sci Med Sport 1:6–19CrossRef
go back to reference Bloom B (1982) National Centre for Health Statistics, current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1981. Vital and Health Statistics: series 10, no.14. U.S. Department of Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 2–1569, Hyattsville, MD Bloom B (1982) National Centre for Health Statistics, current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1981. Vital and Health Statistics: series 10, no.14. U.S. Department of Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 2–1569, Hyattsville, MD
go back to reference Bouten CVC, Verboeket-van de Venne WPHG, Westerterp KR, Verduin M, Janssen JD (1996) Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. J Appl Physiol 81:1019–1026PubMed Bouten CVC, Verboeket-van de Venne WPHG, Westerterp KR, Verduin M, Janssen JD (1996) Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. J Appl Physiol 81:1019–1026PubMed
go back to reference Caspersen CJ, Pollard RA (1988) Validity of global self-reports of physical activity in epidemiology. CVD Epidemiology Newsletter 43:15 Caspersen CJ, Pollard RA (1988) Validity of global self-reports of physical activity in epidemiology. CVD Epidemiology Newsletter 43:15
go back to reference Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM (1985) Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health related research. Public Health Rep 100:126–130PubMed Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM (1985) Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health related research. Public Health Rep 100:126–130PubMed
go back to reference Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR Jr (2003) Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1455–1460CrossRefPubMed Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR Jr (2003) Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1455–1460CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Freedson PS, Miller K (2000) Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:21–29 Freedson PS, Miller K (2000) Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:21–29
go back to reference Haskell WL, Kiernan M (2000) Methodologic issues in measuring physical activity and physical fitness when evaluating the role of dietary supplements for physically active people. Am J Clin Nutr 72:S541–S550 Haskell WL, Kiernan M (2000) Methodologic issues in measuring physical activity and physical fitness when evaluating the role of dietary supplements for physically active people. Am J Clin Nutr 72:S541–S550
go back to reference Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P (2000) Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S442–S449CrossRef Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P (2000) Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S442–S449CrossRef
go back to reference Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman T, Leon AS (1993) A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:81–91PubMedCrossRef Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman T, Leon AS (1993) A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:81–91PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Janz KF (2002) Heart rate monitors to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed): Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 143–162 Janz KF (2002) Heart rate monitors to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed): Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 143–162
go back to reference Keim NL, Blanton CA, Kretch MJ (2004) America’s obesity epidemic: measuring physical activity to promote an active lifestyle. J Am Diet Assoc 104:1398–1409CrossRefPubMed Keim NL, Blanton CA, Kretch MJ (2004) America’s obesity epidemic: measuring physical activity to promote an active lifestyle. J Am Diet Assoc 104:1398–1409CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lamonte MJ, Ainsworth BE (2001) Quantifying energy expenditure and physical activity in the context of dose response. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S370–S378PubMedCrossRef Lamonte MJ, Ainsworth BE (2001) Quantifying energy expenditure and physical activity in the context of dose response. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S370–S378PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference LaPorte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ (1985) Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. Public Health Reports 100:1310–1346 LaPorte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ (1985) Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. Public Health Reports 100:1310–1346
go back to reference Lee IM, Skerrett PJ (2001) Physical activity and all-cause mortality: what is the dose response relation? Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S459–S471PubMedCrossRef Lee IM, Skerrett PJ (2001) Physical activity and all-cause mortality: what is the dose response relation? Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S459–S471PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Livingstone MB, Robson PJ, Wallace JM, McKinley MC (2003) How active are we? Levels of routine physical activity in children and adults. Proc Nutr Soc 62:681–701CrossRefPubMed Livingstone MB, Robson PJ, Wallace JM, McKinley MC (2003) How active are we? Levels of routine physical activity in children and adults. Proc Nutr Soc 62:681–701CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Macera CA, Jhones DA, Kimsey CD, Ham S, Pratt M (2000) New directions in surveillance of physical activity among U.S. adults: a pilot study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S260CrossRef Macera CA, Jhones DA, Kimsey CD, Ham S, Pratt M (2000) New directions in surveillance of physical activity among U.S. adults: a pilot study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S260CrossRef
go back to reference Matthews CE (2002) Techniques for physical activity assessment. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics Publisher, Champaigne, IL, pp 105–123 Matthews CE (2002) Techniques for physical activity assessment. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics Publisher, Champaigne, IL, pp 105–123
go back to reference McKenzie TL (2002) Use of direct observation to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 179–195 McKenzie TL (2002) Use of direct observation to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 179–195
go back to reference Melanson EL, Freedson PS (1996) Physical activity assessment: a review of methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 36:385–396PubMedCrossRef Melanson EL, Freedson PS (1996) Physical activity assessment: a review of methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 36:385–396PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Montoye HJ, Taylor HL (1984) Measurement of physical activities on population studies: a review. Hum Biol 56:195–216PubMed Montoye HJ, Taylor HL (1984) Measurement of physical activities on population studies: a review. Hum Biol 56:195–216PubMed
go back to reference Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Sarris WHM, Washburn RA (1996) Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL: Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Sarris WHM, Washburn RA (1996) Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL:
go back to reference Pate RR (1993) Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 33:321–326PubMed Pate RR (1993) Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 33:321–326PubMed
go back to reference Pereira MA, FitzerGerald SJ, Gregg EW, Joswiak ML, Ryan WJ, Suminski RR Utter AC, Zmuda JM (1997) A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:S1–S203PubMed Pereira MA, FitzerGerald SJ, Gregg EW, Joswiak ML, Ryan WJ, Suminski RR Utter AC, Zmuda JM (1997) A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:S1–S203PubMed
go back to reference Sallis JF, Saelens BE (2000) Assessment of physical activity by self-reports: status limitations and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:S1–S14PubMed Sallis JF, Saelens BE (2000) Assessment of physical activity by self-reports: status limitations and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:S1–S14PubMed
go back to reference Schoeller DA, Racette SB (1990) A review of field techniques for the assessment of energy expenditure. J Nutr 120:1492–1495PubMed Schoeller DA, Racette SB (1990) A review of field techniques for the assessment of energy expenditure. J Nutr 120:1492–1495PubMed
go back to reference Schoeller DA, Van Saten E (1982) Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by double-labelled water method. J Appl Physiol 53:955–959PubMed Schoeller DA, Van Saten E (1982) Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by double-labelled water method. J Appl Physiol 53:955–959PubMed
go back to reference Shephard RJ (2003) Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires: review. Br J Sports Med 37:197–206PubMedCrossRef Shephard RJ (2003) Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires: review. Br J Sports Med 37:197–206PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Speakman JR (1998) The history and theory of the doubly labeled water technique. Am J Clin Nutr 68:S932–S938 Speakman JR (1998) The history and theory of the doubly labeled water technique. Am J Clin Nutr 68:S932–S938
go back to reference Starling RD (2002) Use of doubly labeled water and indirect calorimetry to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research, Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 197–209 Starling RD (2002) Use of doubly labeled water and indirect calorimetry to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed) Physical activity assessment for health-related research, Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 197–209
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Physical activity and health : a report of the Surgeon General. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Physical activity and health : a report of the Surgeon General. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
go back to reference Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Martens M, Huygens W, Troosters T, Beunen G (2005) How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 12:102–114CrossRefPubMed Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Martens M, Huygens W, Troosters T, Beunen G (2005) How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 12:102–114CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wareham NJ, Rennie KL (1998) The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2:S30–S38 Wareham NJ, Rennie KL (1998) The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2:S30–S38
go back to reference Washburn RA, Adams LL, Haile GT (1987) Physical activity assessment for epidemiologic research: the utility of two simplified approaches. Prev Med 16:636–646CrossRefPubMed Washburn RA, Adams LL, Haile GT (1987) Physical activity assessment for epidemiologic research: the utility of two simplified approaches. Prev Med 16:636–646CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Webb P (1980) The measurement of energy exchange in man: an analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 33:1299–1310PubMed Webb P (1980) The measurement of energy exchange in man: an analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 33:1299–1310PubMed
go back to reference Welk GJ (2002) Use of the accelerometry-based activity monitors to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed): Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 125–142 Welk GJ (2002) Use of the accelerometry-based activity monitors to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ (ed): Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, pp 125–142
go back to reference Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW (2000) A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports and Exerc 32:S489–S497CrossRef Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW (2000) A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports and Exerc 32:S489–S497CrossRef
go back to reference Wood TM (2000) Issues and future directions in assessing physical activity: An introduction to the conference proceedings. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:ii–vii Wood TM (2000) Issues and future directions in assessing physical activity: An introduction to the conference proceedings. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:ii–vii
Metadata
Title
Methodology of physical-activity and energy-expenditure assessment: a review
Authors
E. M. Valanou
C. Bamia
A. Trichopoulou
Publication date
01-04-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Public Health / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 2198-1833
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-006-0021-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Journal of Public Health 2/2006 Go to the issue