Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 3/2015

01-05-2015 | Clinical Investigation

CLOCK CHART®: a novel multi-stimulus self-check visual field screener

Authors: Chota Matsumoto, Mariko Eura, Sachiko Okuyama, Sonoko Takada, Eiko Arimura-Koike, Shigeki Hashimoto, Fumi Tanabe, Yoshikazu Shimomura

Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

CLOCK CHART® is a multi-stimulus-type self-check visual field screening sheet developed by our group. The test chart is rotated during the examination, and the visual field abnormalities are pointed out by the patients themselves. In this study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of this chart in patients with glaucoma.

Methods

We studied 114 eyes of 114 glaucoma patients (average age 60.0 ± 11.1 years) and 45 eyes of 45 normal individuals (average age 45.0 ± 16.4 years) using CLOCK CHART®. The static visual fields were obtained using the Octopus 101 G2 program and classified using the Aulhorn classification as modified by Greve (stages 0–I to IV) and by mean defect (MD; early <6 dB; moderate 6 ≤ MD ≤12 dB; severe >12 dB).The sensitivity and specificity of CLOCK CHART® for detecting visual field abnormalities were evaluated within the entire 25° field and at the 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, and 25° eccentricity zones. The visual field agreement between the results of CLOCK CHART® and the static visual fields were also evaluated.

Results

In glaucomatous eyes, the sensitivity of CLOCK CHART® was 85, 93, and 100 % for Greve stages I, II and III–VI, respectively, and 87, 93, and 97 % for the MD value in early, moderate, and severe eyes, respectively. The agreement of the visual field defect area in CLOCK CHART® with the static fields was 85 and 100 % with Greve stages 0–I to I and II–VI, respectively, and 91, 96, and 96 % in early, moderate and severe glaucomatous eyes according to MD, respectively. The specificity of CLOCK CHART® was 89 %.

Conclusion

CLOCK CHART® is a simple and reliable self-check screening chart for detecting visual field abnormalities in patients with glaucoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Shirato S, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1641–8.PubMed Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Shirato S, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1641–8.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF. How does glaucoma look?:patient perception of visual field loss. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1120–6.CrossRefPubMed Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF. How does glaucoma look?:patient perception of visual field loss. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1120–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Aulhon E, Köst G. Noise-field campimetry: a new perimetric method (snow campimetry). In: Heijl A, editor. Perimetry Update 1988/1989. Amsterdam: Kuglerand Ghedini Publications; 1989. p. 331–6. Aulhon E, Köst G. Noise-field campimetry: a new perimetric method (snow campimetry). In: Heijl A, editor. Perimetry Update 1988/1989. Amsterdam: Kuglerand Ghedini Publications; 1989. p. 331–6.
4.
go back to reference Shirato S, Adachi M, Hara T. Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:273–81.PubMed Shirato S, Adachi M, Hara T. Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:273–81.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Adachi M, Shirato S. The usefulness of the noise-field test as a screening method for visual field defects. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1994;38:392–9.PubMed Adachi M, Shirato S. The usefulness of the noise-field test as a screening method for visual field defects. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1994;38:392–9.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Katsushima H. Subjective detection of glaucomatous visual field defect using Suzuki’s eye-check chart. RinshoGanka. 2004;58:345–8. Katsushima H. Subjective detection of glaucomatous visual field defect using Suzuki’s eye-check chart. RinshoGanka. 2004;58:345–8.
7.
go back to reference Inoue K, Wakakura M, Inoue J, Tomita G. Detection of glaucoma using Suzuki’s eye-check chart. GankaRinshoIho. 2005;99:214–6. Inoue K, Wakakura M, Inoue J, Tomita G. Detection of glaucoma using Suzuki’s eye-check chart. GankaRinshoIho. 2005;99:214–6.
8.
go back to reference Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H. Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series. 1977;14:75–83. Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H. Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series. 1977;14:75–83.
9.
go back to reference Harrington DO, Drake MV. The visual fields: textbook and atlas of clinical perimetry. 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1976. Harrington DO, Drake MV. The visual fields: textbook and atlas of clinical perimetry. 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1976.
10.
go back to reference Bedwell CH. Visual fields: a basis for efficient investigation. London: Butterworth Scientific; 1982. Bedwell CH. Visual fields: a basis for efficient investigation. London: Butterworth Scientific; 1982.
11.
go back to reference Henson DB, Bryson H. Clinical results with the Henson-Hamblin CFS 2000. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series. 1986;49:233–8.CrossRef Henson DB, Bryson H. Clinical results with the Henson-Hamblin CFS 2000. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series. 1986;49:233–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Takada S, Otsuki T, Matsumoto C, Okuyama S, Iwagaki A, Otori T. Clinical evaluation of a new automated perimetrydevice (Dicon LD 400). Folia Ophthalmol Jpn. 1997;48:672–8. Takada S, Otsuki T, Matsumoto C, Okuyama S, Iwagaki A, Otori T. Clinical evaluation of a new automated perimetrydevice (Dicon LD 400). Folia Ophthalmol Jpn. 1997;48:672–8.
Metadata
Title
CLOCK CHART®: a novel multi-stimulus self-check visual field screener
Authors
Chota Matsumoto
Mariko Eura
Sachiko Okuyama
Sonoko Takada
Eiko Arimura-Koike
Shigeki Hashimoto
Fumi Tanabe
Yoshikazu Shimomura
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0021-5155
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0368-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 3/2015 Go to the issue