Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Surgery 3/2022

Open Access 11-04-2022 | Esophageal Cancer | main topic

As time goes by–developments in surgery for esophageal cancer in the new millennium

Authors: Joerg Lindenmann, MD, Alfred Maier, Melanie Fediuk, Iurii Mykoliuk, Andrej Roj, Udo Anegg, Josef Smolle, Freyja Maria Smolle-Juettner

Published in: European Surgery | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Summary

Background

In the last two decades, both treatment options and epidemiological features of cancer have changed. We studied the influence of related parameters on the outcome of patients undergoing resection for esophageal carcinoma.

Methods

We analyzed 499 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for carcinoma since January 2000, comparing 2000–2010 with 2011–2021 and examining changes over time.

Results

The percentage of men (87.9 vs. 86.9%; p = 0.74) in the two groups was unchanged, whereas mean age increased significantly from 60.8 to 65.2 years (p = 0.000). There was a trend towards an increase of adenocarcinoma (gamma = 0.120, ASE = 0.055). Despite significantly increasing use of induction chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.000) from 7.14% in 2000 to 68.9% in 2021 the distribution of pT, pN stage, grading and the rate of positive lateral resection margins remained unchanged. When comparing the two periods, the overall 30-day mortality was 4.4 vs. 4.2% (p = 0.56), recurrence-free survival was 36.9 vs. 38% at 60 months and 33.9 vs. 36.4% at 120 months (p = 0.93). Tumor-associated survival was 41.1 vs. 45% at 60 months and 35.5 vs. 38.7% at 120 months (p = 0.78). None of the survival rates differed significantly. A multivariable analysis of year of surgery, age, sex, histological subtype, grading, pT, pN, lateral resection margin, and induction therapy showed that only higher pT (p = 0.01), positive pN (p = 0.000), positive lateral margin (p = 0.003), squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.04) and higher grading (p = 0.026) had a statistically significant, independent, negative influence on prognosis.

Conclusion

Optimized noninvasive and invasive therapeutic modalities have produced only marginal improvement in the prognosis of esophageal cancer within the last two decades.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Whiteman DC, Wilson LF. The fractions of cancer attributable to modifiable factors: A global review. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;44:203–21.CrossRef Whiteman DC, Wilson LF. The fractions of cancer attributable to modifiable factors: A global review. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;44:203–21.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Katzmarzyk PT, Friedenreich C, Shiroma EJ, Lee IM. Physical inactivity and non-communicable disease burden in low-income, middle-income and high-income countries. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(2):101–6.CrossRef Katzmarzyk PT, Friedenreich C, Shiroma EJ, Lee IM. Physical inactivity and non-communicable disease burden in low-income, middle-income and high-income countries. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(2):101–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cook AM, McDonnell AM, Lake RA, Nowak AK. Dexamethasone co-medication in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy causes substantial immunomodulatory effects with implications for chemo-immunotherapy strategies. OncoImmunology. 2016;5(3):e1066062.CrossRef Cook AM, McDonnell AM, Lake RA, Nowak AK. Dexamethasone co-medication in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy causes substantial immunomodulatory effects with implications for chemo-immunotherapy strategies. OncoImmunology. 2016;5(3):e1066062.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Guckenberger M, Baus WW, Blanck O, et al. Definition and quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020;196(5):417–20.CrossRef Guckenberger M, Baus WW, Blanck O, et al. Definition and quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020;196(5):417–20.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shepherd SJ, Klein AA, Martinez G. Enhanced recovery for thoracic surgery in the elderly. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(1):30–8.CrossRef Shepherd SJ, Klein AA, Martinez G. Enhanced recovery for thoracic surgery in the elderly. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(1):30–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mohata S, Kumar HS, Sharma N, Jhakhar SL, Beniwal S, Harsh KK. Acute treatment-related toxicity in elderly patients with good performance status compared to young patients in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma treated by definitive chemoradiation: A retrospective comparative study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2020;16(1):116–9.CrossRef Mohata S, Kumar HS, Sharma N, Jhakhar SL, Beniwal S, Harsh KK. Acute treatment-related toxicity in elderly patients with good performance status compared to young patients in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma treated by definitive chemoradiation: A retrospective comparative study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2020;16(1):116–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ogawa K, Ishikawa H, Hisakura K, et al. Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021;26(10):1856–63.CrossRef Ogawa K, Ishikawa H, Hisakura K, et al. Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021;26(10):1856–63.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Haneda R, Booka E, Ishii K, et al. Evaluation of definitive chemoradiotherapy versus radical Esophagectomy in clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg. 2021;45(6):1835–44.CrossRef Haneda R, Booka E, Ishii K, et al. Evaluation of definitive chemoradiotherapy versus radical Esophagectomy in clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg. 2021;45(6):1835–44.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nottingham JM, McKeown DG. Transhiatal esophagectomy. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2022. Nottingham JM, McKeown DG. Transhiatal esophagectomy. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2022.
10.
go back to reference Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47(9):829–54.CrossRef Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47(9):829–54.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kato H, Nakajima M. Treatments for esophageal cancer: a review. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61(6):330–5.CrossRef Kato H, Nakajima M. Treatments for esophageal cancer: a review. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61(6):330–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090–8.CrossRef Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kauppila JH, Wahlin K, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. Sex differences in the prognosis after surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(6):1284–91.CrossRef Kauppila JH, Wahlin K, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. Sex differences in the prognosis after surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(6):1284–91.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Arnold M, Ferlay J, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Soerjomataram I. Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018. Gut. 2020;69(9):1564–71.CrossRef Arnold M, Ferlay J, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Soerjomataram I. Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018. Gut. 2020;69(9):1564–71.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosemurgy A, Wilfong C, Craigg D, Co F, Sucandy I, Ross S. The evolving landscape of esophageal cancer: A four-decade analysis. Am Surg. 2019;85(9):944–8.CrossRef Rosemurgy A, Wilfong C, Craigg D, Co F, Sucandy I, Ross S. The evolving landscape of esophageal cancer: A four-decade analysis. Am Surg. 2019;85(9):944–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):360–73.CrossRef Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):360–73.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference GBD 2017 Oesophageal Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(6):582–97.CrossRef GBD 2017 Oesophageal Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(6):582–97.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Xie SH, Lagergren J. Risk factors for oesophageal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;36–37:3–8.CrossRef Xie SH, Lagergren J. Risk factors for oesophageal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;36–37:3–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Uhlenhopp DJ, Then EO, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer: update in global trends, etiology and risk factors. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2020;13(6):1010–21.CrossRef Uhlenhopp DJ, Then EO, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer: update in global trends, etiology and risk factors. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2020;13(6):1010–21.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Recent developments in esophageal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(4):232–48.CrossRef Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Recent developments in esophageal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(4):232–48.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, Lagergren P. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2383–96.CrossRef Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, Lagergren P. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2383–96.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Valsangkar N, Salfity HVN, Timsina L, Ceppa DP, Ceppa EP, Birdas TJ. Operative time in esophagectomy: Does it affect outcomes? Surgery. 2018;164(4):866–71.CrossRef Valsangkar N, Salfity HVN, Timsina L, Ceppa DP, Ceppa EP, Birdas TJ. Operative time in esophagectomy: Does it affect outcomes? Surgery. 2018;164(4):866–71.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Blinn P, Maramara T, Meredith K. Comparative outcomes of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy. Surgery. 2021;170(1):263–70.CrossRef Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Blinn P, Maramara T, Meredith K. Comparative outcomes of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy. Surgery. 2021;170(1):263–70.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, et al. Minimally invasive versus open McKeown for patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(11):6329–36.CrossRef Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, et al. Minimally invasive versus open McKeown for patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(11):6329–36.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Duan X, Gong L, Yue J, et al. Influence of induction therapy on robot-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Surg. 2020;37(6):463–71.CrossRef Duan X, Gong L, Yue J, et al. Influence of induction therapy on robot-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Surg. 2020;37(6):463–71.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zhou J, Chen H, Lu JJ, et al. Application of a modified McKeown procedure (thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization three-incision esophagectomy) in esophageal cancer surgery: initial experience with 30 cases. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(8):687–93.CrossRef Zhou J, Chen H, Lu JJ, et al. Application of a modified McKeown procedure (thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization three-incision esophagectomy) in esophageal cancer surgery: initial experience with 30 cases. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(8):687–93.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mu JW, Gao SG, Xue Q, et al. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(45):12873–81.CrossRef Mu JW, Gao SG, Xue Q, et al. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(45):12873–81.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kammili A, Cools-Lartigue J, Mulder D, Feldman LS, Ferri LE, Mueller CL. Transition from open to minimally invasive en bloc esophagectomy can be achieved without compromising surgical quality. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(6):3067–76.CrossRef Kammili A, Cools-Lartigue J, Mulder D, Feldman LS, Ferri LE, Mueller CL. Transition from open to minimally invasive en bloc esophagectomy can be achieved without compromising surgical quality. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(6):3067–76.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Faiz Z, van Putten M, Verhoeven RHA, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of two different treatment options for patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(4):986–95.CrossRef Faiz Z, van Putten M, Verhoeven RHA, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of two different treatment options for patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(4):986–95.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Yan W, Zhao P, Fu H, et al. Survival after induction chemotherapy and esophagectomy is not improved by adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(5):1505–13.CrossRef Yan W, Zhao P, Fu H, et al. Survival after induction chemotherapy and esophagectomy is not improved by adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(5):1505–13.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Semenkovich TR, Panni RZ, Hudson JL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: A decision analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(5):2221–2230.e1.CrossRef Semenkovich TR, Panni RZ, Hudson JL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: A decision analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(5):2221–2230.e1.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Liou DZ, Backhus LM, Lui NS, Shrager JB, Berry MF. Induction therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal adenocarcinoma: Is radiation always necessary? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(6):2697–707.CrossRef Liou DZ, Backhus LM, Lui NS, Shrager JB, Berry MF. Induction therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal adenocarcinoma: Is radiation always necessary? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(6):2697–707.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Newman E, Potmesil M, Ryan T, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma: a phase II study. Semin Oncol. 2005;32(6 Suppl 9):97–100.CrossRef Newman E, Potmesil M, Ryan T, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma: a phase II study. Semin Oncol. 2005;32(6 Suppl 9):97–100.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
As time goes by–developments in surgery for esophageal cancer in the new millennium
Authors
Joerg Lindenmann, MD
Alfred Maier
Melanie Fediuk
Iurii Mykoliuk
Andrej Roj
Udo Anegg
Josef Smolle
Freyja Maria Smolle-Juettner
Publication date
11-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
European Surgery / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Electronic ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-022-00752-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

European Surgery 3/2022 Go to the issue