Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Surgery
Published in: European Surgery 5/2017

01-10-2017 | original article

Dual-port vs. single-port laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer

Perioperative outcomes of case-control study

Author: Jin Yong Shin, MD

Published in: European Surgery | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Summary

Background

Dual-port laparoscopic colectomy (DPLC) has emerged as a surgical option that can overcome the technical limitations of single-port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC). The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of DPLC and SPLC for colon cancer.

Patients and methods

This case-control study assessed 119 patients who underwent colon cancer surgery using DPLC (n = 66) and SPLC (n = 53).

Results

Propensity score matching resulted in 42 pairs of patients, equivalent in distribution of TNM stage and tumor size. Perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications were similar in the two groups, except for a tendency toward less blood loss in the DPLC group (50 ml vs. 100 ml, p = 0.087). Umbilical incision sites were significantly more common in the DPLC than in the SPLC group with left-sided colon cancer (94.4% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.032). In a subgroup of patients with stage II–IV tumors, there were no significant between-group differences in perioperative outcomes.

Conclusion

These findings show that perioperative outcomes following colon cancer surgery with DPLC were not superior to those achieved with SPLC. DPLC may be associated with better cosmetic outcomes through greater use of an umbilical approach for left-sided colectomies.
Literature
1.
Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3‑year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(21):3061–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2050–9.CrossRef
3.
Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2224–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, et al. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(8):823–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hasegawa F, Kawamura Y, Sasaki J, et al. Oncological 3‑port laparoscopic colectomy by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator: a preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(2):176–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: A propensity-score-matched analysis of 214 cases. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1317–25.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Poon JT, Cheung C, Fan JK, et al. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2729–34.CrossRefPubMed
8.
McNally M, Todd Moore B, Brown K. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(11):3559–65.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kim H, Kang B, Lee S, et al. Single-port laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea: retrospective analysis of the multicenter, pooled database. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(7):462–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Yun J, Yun S, Park Y, et al. Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colon cancer. Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):973–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Tashiro J, Yamaguchi S, Ishii T, et al. Initial experience of reduced port surgery using a two-surgeon technique for colorectal cancer. BMC Surg. 2015;15:91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Lim SW, Kim HJ, Kim CH, et al. Umbilical incision laparoscopic colectomy with one additional port for colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(2):193–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Makino T, Milsom J, Lee S. Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):667–76.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Yu H, Shin J. Short-term outcomes following reduced-port, single-port, and multi-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: Tailored laparoscopic approaches based on tumor size and nodal status. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(1):115–22.CrossRefPubMed
15.
D’Agostino RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17(19):2265–81.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kawamata F, Homma S, Minagawa N, et al. Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2014;38(10):2716–23.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Jung K, Yun S, Cho Y, et al. Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: Initial experience in 96 cases. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86(5):403–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, et al. Single-incision vs straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: A case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(2):183–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lai W, Lin Y, Lee K, et al. The application of McBurney’s single-incision laparoscopic colectomy alleviates the response of patients to postoperative wound pain. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(9):606–11.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kim S, Ryu G, Choi B, et al. The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):933–40.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Keller D, Flores Gonzalez J, Sandhu J, et al. SILS v SILS+1: A case-matched comparison for colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(10):1875–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dual-port vs. single-port laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer
Perioperative outcomes of case-control study
Author
Jin Yong Shin, MD
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
European Surgery / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Electronic ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0482-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

European Surgery 5/2017 Go to the issue

case report

A rare case of Calot’s triangle paraganglioma

original scientific paper

Multimodality locoregional treatment strategies for bridging HCC patients before liver transplantation

original article

Effects of teduglutide on histological parameters of intestinal anastomotic healing

original scientific paper

Preoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia: barium swallow X-ray, high-resolution manometry, or endoscopy?

review

Notch and its oncogenic activity in human malignancies

case report

A rare but life-threatening complication of aortic surgery: iliac appendiceal fistula