Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Surgery 3/2017

01-06-2017 | case report

Laparoscopic appendectomy using only two 5 mm trocars

Author: Hugo Bonatti, MD

Published in: European Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Summary

Background

Laparoscopic appendectomy is now the standard and most surgeons use two 5 mm and one 10–12 mm port; the latter placed into the umbilicus. Various attempts have been made to reduce the number and sizes of ports for this procedure.

Case report

A 22-year-old male with acute right lower quadrant pain came to our emergency room. His white blood count (WBC) was 15000 l/ml and on CT scan signs of acute appendicitis were found. He was taken to the operating room. His abdomen was accessed with a Verres in the left upper quadrant (LUQ) and once pneumoperitoneum was established a 5 mm trocar was placed under visual control into the left lower quadrant (LLQ). A phlegmonous appendix was found attached to the right abdominal wall. The Verres needle was exchanged for another 5 mm trocar. A Maryland grasper was used to bluntly create a window between appendix base and mesoappendix. The appendiceal artery was dissected out and secured with a 5 mm clip and the mesoappendix was cut off the appendix. Two endoloops were lassoed around the appendix and tied at the appendix base and the specimen was amputated between the ties. The appendix was pulled with the distal tie towards the LUQ port, which was removed. The appendix base was grabbed with a Kelly clamp and the specimen was pulled through the port site. Pneumoperitoneum was released and the LLQ port removed and the skin closed. The patient was discharged after 2 h and had a completely uneventful recovery.

Conclusion

In selected cases with favorable anatomy, laparoscopic appendectomy with two 5 mm ports may be possible. Miniaturizing this procedure while carefully weighing patient safety and costs should be a goal for laparoscopic appendectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Liu Y. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Liu Y. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Rollins KE, Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Antibiotics versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: An updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2305–18. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3561-7.CrossRefPubMed Rollins KE, Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Antibiotics versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: An updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2305–18. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-016-3561-7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Matthews BD, Mostafa G, Harold KL, Kercher KW, Reardon PR, Heniford BT. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11(6):351–5.CrossRefPubMed Matthews BD, Mostafa G, Harold KL, Kercher KW, Reardon PR, Heniford BT. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11(6):351–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Panait L, Bell RL, Duffy AJ, Roberts KE. Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy: Minimizing the minimally invasive approach. J Surg Res. 2009;153(1):167–71.CrossRefPubMed Panait L, Bell RL, Duffy AJ, Roberts KE. Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy: Minimizing the minimally invasive approach. J Surg Res. 2009;153(1):167–71.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Roberts KE. True single-port appendectomy: First experience with the “puppeteer technique”. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1825–30.CrossRefPubMed Roberts KE. True single-port appendectomy: First experience with the “puppeteer technique”. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1825–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2014;207(4):613–22.CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2014;207(4):613–22.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kayaalp C, Tolan K, Yagci MA. Corrigendum to “Transvaginal appendectomy: A systematic review”. Minim Invasive Surg. 2015;2015:527140.PubMedPubMedCentral Kayaalp C, Tolan K, Yagci MA. Corrigendum to “Transvaginal appendectomy: A systematic review”. Minim Invasive Surg. 2015;2015:527140.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
10.
go back to reference Donmez T, Hut A, Avaroglu H, Uzman S, Yildirim D, Ferahman S, et al. Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;91(2):59–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Donmez T, Hut A, Avaroglu H, Uzman S, Yildirim D, Ferahman S, et al. Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;91(2):59–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic appendectomy using only two 5 mm trocars
Author
Hugo Bonatti, MD
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
European Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Electronic ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-017-0465-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue