Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/2005

01-11-2005 | Original Contribution

Patient’s Preferences for Adjuvant Postoperative Chemoradiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer

Authors: Jean Couture, M.D., Ron Chan, M.D., Fatima Bouharaoui, M.Sc.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 11/2005

Login to get access

PURPOSE

This study was designed to elicit patient’s preferences with regard to adjuvant postoperative chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer.

METHODS

Forty-seven previously treated colorectal cancer patients underwent a structured interview and were presented with two scenarios involving surgery for rectal cancer: surgery alone, or surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiation therapy. Acute and long-term health states for each options were described. Their willingness to trade-off side-effects for treatment efficacy was evaluated by using the probability trade-off method.

RESULTS

The age and gender distribution of the cohort were comparable with the general colon cancer population. Rectal cancer had been diagnosed in 20 individuals. The majority of patients valued their disease-free status in light of the anticipated long-term effects on their quality of life. The median point at which patients switched their preference was 5 percent, a value reflecting the critical local recurrence rate acceptable. The important items that influenced decisions were the effects on bowel function and fear of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This small study demonstrates a substantial variation in patient’s preferences with regard to postoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Further studies in the preoperative setting are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Whelan, T, Levine, M, Willan, A, et al. 2004Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trialJAMA29243541PubMedCrossRef Whelan, T, Levine, M, Willan, A,  et al. 2004Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trialJAMA29243541PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arbman, G, Nilsson, E, Hallbook, O, Sjodahl, R 1996Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBr J Surg833759PubMed Arbman, G, Nilsson, E, Hallbook, O, Sjodahl, R 1996Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBr J Surg833759PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dahlberg, M, Pahlman, L, Bergstrom, R, Glimelius, B 1998Improved survival in patients with rectal cancer: a population-based register studyBr J Surg8551520PubMedCrossRef Dahlberg, M, Pahlman, L, Bergstrom, R, Glimelius, B 1998Improved survival in patients with rectal cancer: a population-based register studyBr J Surg8551520PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dahlberg, M, Glimelius, B, Graf, W, Pahlman, L 1998Preoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer: results from a randomized studyDis Colon Rectum415439 Dahlberg, M, Glimelius, B, Graf, W, Pahlman, L 1998Preoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer: results from a randomized studyDis Colon Rectum415439
5.
go back to reference Kapiteijn, E, Marijnen, CA, Nagtegaal, ID, et al. 2001Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancerN Engl J Med34563846PubMedCrossRef Kapiteijn, E, Marijnen, CA, Nagtegaal, ID,  et al. 2001Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancerN Engl J Med34563846PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Llewelyn-Thomas, HA 1997Investigating patients' preferences for different treatment optionsCan J Nurs Res294564 Llewelyn-Thomas, HA 1997Investigating patients' preferences for different treatment optionsCan J Nurs Res294564
7.
go back to reference Haes, JC, Stiggelbout, AM 1996Assessment of values, utilities and preferences in cancer patientsCancer Treat Rev221326PubMed Haes, JC, Stiggelbout, AM 1996Assessment of values, utilities and preferences in cancer patientsCancer Treat Rev221326PubMed
8.
go back to reference Man-Son-Hing, M, Laupacis, A, O'Connor, AM, Lemelin, J, Wood, WE, Dermer, M 1996Warfarin for atrial fibrillation. The patient's perspectiveArch Intern Med15618418PubMedCrossRef Man-Son-Hing, M, Laupacis, A, O'Connor, AM, Lemelin, J, Wood, WE, Dermer, M 1996Warfarin for atrial fibrillation. The patient's perspectiveArch Intern Med15618418PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Llewelyn-Thomas, HA, Williams, JI, Levy, L, Naylor, CD 1996Using a trade-off technique to assess patients' treatment preferences for benign prostatic hyperplasiaMed Decis Making1626272 Llewelyn-Thomas, HA, Williams, JI, Levy, L, Naylor, CD 1996Using a trade-off technique to assess patients' treatment preferences for benign prostatic hyperplasiaMed Decis Making1626272
10.
go back to reference Brundage, MD, Davidson, JR, Mackillop, WJ 1997Trading treatment toxicity for survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancerJ Clin Oncol1533040PubMed Brundage, MD, Davidson, JR, Mackillop, WJ 1997Trading treatment toxicity for survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancerJ Clin Oncol1533040PubMed
11.
go back to reference Palda, VA, Llewelyn-Thomas, HA, Mackenzie, RG, Pritchard, KI, Harrison-Woermke, DE, Naylor, CD 1994Breast cancer patients' perceptions of the effectiveness of radiation therapy [abstract]Med Decis Making14438 Palda, VA, Llewelyn-Thomas, HA, Mackenzie, RG, Pritchard, KI, Harrison-Woermke, DE, Naylor, CD 1994Breast cancer patients' perceptions of the effectiveness of radiation therapy [abstract]Med Decis Making14438
12.
go back to reference Ness, RM, Holmes, A, Klein, R, Greene, J, Dittus, R 1998Outcome states of colorectal cancer: identification and description using patient focus groupsAm J Gastroenterol9314917PubMed Ness, RM, Holmes, A, Klein, R, Greene, J, Dittus, R 1998Outcome states of colorectal cancer: identification and description using patient focus groupsAm J Gastroenterol9314917PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ness, RM, Holmes, AM, Klein, R, Dittus, R 1999Utility valuations for outcome states of colorectal cancerAm J Gastroenterol9416507PubMedCrossRef Ness, RM, Holmes, AM, Klein, R, Dittus, R 1999Utility valuations for outcome states of colorectal cancerAm J Gastroenterol9416507PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wong, RK, Gafni, A, Whelan, T, Franssen, E, Fung, K 2002Defining patient-based minimal clinically important effect sizes: a study in palliative radiotherapy for painful unresectable pelvic recurrences from rectal cancerInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys546619PubMed Wong, RK, Gafni, A, Whelan, T, Franssen, E, Fung, K 2002Defining patient-based minimal clinically important effect sizes: a study in palliative radiotherapy for painful unresectable pelvic recurrences from rectal cancerInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys546619PubMed
15.
go back to reference Solomon, MJ, Pager, CK, Keshava, A, et al. 2003What do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in the treatment of colorectal cancerDis Colon Rectum4613517PubMed Solomon, MJ, Pager, CK, Keshava, A,  et al. 2003What do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in the treatment of colorectal cancerDis Colon Rectum4613517PubMed
16.
go back to reference Stiggelbout, AM, Haes, JC 2001Patient preference for cancer therapy: an overview of measurement approachesJ Clin Oncol1922030PubMed Stiggelbout, AM, Haes, JC 2001Patient preference for cancer therapy: an overview of measurement approachesJ Clin Oncol1922030PubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient’s Preferences for Adjuvant Postoperative Chemoradiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer
Authors
Jean Couture, M.D.
Ron Chan, M.D.
Fatima Bouharaoui, M.Sc.
Publication date
01-11-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 11/2005
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0174-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2005

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/2005 Go to the issue