Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 9/2005

01-09-2005 | Original Contribution

Progressive Increase of Bowel Wall Thickness Is a Reliable Indicator for Surgery in Patients With Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction

Authors: Shyr-Chyr Chen, M.D., Chien-Chang Lee, M.D., M.Sc., Chiung-Yuan Hsu, M.D., Zui-Shen Yen, M.D., M.P.H., Cheng-Chung Fang, M.D., Matthew H.-M. Ma, M.D., Ph.D., Wen-Jone Chen, M.D., Ph.D., Hong-Shiee Lai, M.D., Ph.D., Po-Huang Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Fang-Yue Lin, M.D., Ph.D., Wei-Jao Chen, M.D., Ph.D.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 9/2005

Login to get access

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether progressive increase of bowel wall thickness during nonoperative treatment is a reliable indicator for surgery in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.

METHODS

The study consisted of a prospective case series of 121 patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction who underwent an abdominal ultrasonographic examination. The results of ultrasonographic examinations were classified into two groups according to the presence (Group I) or absence (Group II) of bowel wall thickening. Bowel wall thickening was recognized as a visible small bowel wall ≥3 mm in width as seen by ultrasonographic examination. The findings of subsequent ultrasonographic examinations taken 24 hours later were compared with those taken at admission. Surgery was determined based on the presence of any toxic signs or the failure of nonoperative treatment. The number of patients who had successful nonoperative treatment, the number of patients who underwent surgeries, and the number of complications in each group were calculated to correlate with the ultrasonographic findings.

RESULTS

There are 49 and 72 patients in Groups I and II, respectively. The number of patients who had successful nonoperative treatment and number of patients who underwent surgeries in Group I are 40 (81.6 percent) and 9 (18.4 percent) and in Group II the numbers are 68 (94.4 percent) and four (5.6 percent), respectively (P = 0.036). All 12 (100 percent) patients with progressive increase of bowel wall thickness underwent surgery. Progressive increase of bowel wall thickness as an indicator for surgery has a sensitivity of 92.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 62.1–99.6 percent) and a specificity of 100 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 95.7–100 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with initial bowel wall thickening have a higher incidence of surgery, and progressive increase of bowel wall thickness that appears 24 hours later is a reliable indicator for surgery in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.
Literature
1.
Ellis, H, Moran, BJ, Thompson, JN,  et al. 1999Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort studyLancet353147680CrossRefPubMed
2.
Nieuwenhuijzen, M, Reijnen, MM, Kuijpers, JH,  et al. 1998Small bowel obstruction after total or subtotal colectomy: a 10-year retrospective reviewBr J Surg8512425CrossRefPubMed
3.
Wilson, MS, Hawkswell, J, McCloy, RF 1998Natural history of adhesional small bowel obstruction: counting the costBr J Surg8512948CrossRefPubMed
4.
Seror, D, Feigin, E, Szold, A,  et al. 1993How conservatively can postoperative small bowel obstruction be treated?Am J Surg1651216PubMed
5.
Choi, HK, Chu, KW, Law, WL 2002Therapeutic value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction after unsuccessful conservative treatment: a prospective randomized trialAnn Surg23616CrossRefPubMed
6.
Assalia, A, Schein, M, Kopelman, D,  et al. 1994Therapeutic effect of oral Gastrografin in adhesive, partial small-bowel obstruction: a prospective randomized trialSurgery1154337PubMed
7.
Ray, NF, Larsen, JW,Jr, Stillman, RJ,  et al. 1993Economic impact of hospitalizations for lower abdominal adhesion-olysis in the United States in 1988Surg Gynecol Obstet1762716PubMed
8.
Ellis, H 1997The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstructionEur J Surg57759
9.
Menzies, D, Parker, M, Hoare, R,  et al. 2001Small bowel obstruction due to postoperative adhesions: treatment patterns and associated costs in 110 hospital admissionsAnn R Coll Surg Engl83406PubMed
10.
11.
Deutsch, AA, Eviatar, E, Gutman, H,  et al. 1989Small bowel obstruction: a review of 264 cases and suggestions for managementPostgrad Med J654637PubMed
12.
Chung, CC, Meng, WC, Yu, SC,  et al. 1996A prospective study on the use of water-soluble contrast follow-through radiology in the management of small bowel obstructionANZ J Surg66598601
13.
Shih, SC, Jeng, KS, Lin, SC,  et al. 2003Adhesive small bowel obstruction: how long can patients tolerate conservative treatment?World J Gastroenterol96035PubMed
14.
Onoue, S, Katoh, T, Shibata, YM,  et al. 2002The value of contrast radiology for postoperative adhesive small bowel obstructionHepatogastroenterology4915768PubMed
15.
Chen, SC, Lin, FY, Lee, PH,  et al. 1998Water-soluble contrast study predicts the need for early surgery in adhesive small bowel obstructionBr J Surg8516924CrossRefPubMed
16.
Feigin, E, Seror, D, Szold, A,  et al. 1996Water-soluble contrast medium has no therapeutic effect on postoperative small-bowel obstruction: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trialAm J Surg1712279CrossRefPubMed
17.
Chen, SC, Chang, KJ, Lee, PH,  et al. 1999Oral Urografin in postoperative small bowel obstructionWorld J Surg2310514CrossRefPubMed
18.
Yen, ZS, Wang, HP, Ma, HM,  et al. 2002Ultrasonographic screening of clinically suspected necrotizing fasciitisAcad Emerg Med9144851CrossRefPubMed
19.
Puylaert, JB, Zant, FM, Rijke, AM 1997Sonography and the acute abdomen: practical considerationsAJR Am J Roentgenol16817986PubMed
20.
Chen, SC, Yen, ZS, Wang, HP,  et al. 2002Ultrasonography is superior to plain radiography in the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneumBr J Surg893514CrossRefPubMed
21.
Pattison, P, Jeffrey, RB, Mindelzum, RE,  et al. 1997Sonography of intraabdominal gas collectionsAJR Am J Roentgenol169155964PubMed
22.
Chen, SC, Chen, KM, Wang, SM,  et al. 1998Abdominal sonography screening of clinically diagnosed or suspected appendicitis before surgeryWorld J Surg2244952CrossRefPubMed
23.
Ogata, M, Mateer, JR, Condon, RE 1999Prospective evaluation of abdominal sonography for the diagnosis of bowel obstructionAnn Surg22323741CrossRef
24.
Chen, SC, Lin, FY, Hsieh, YS,  et al. 2000Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of peritonitis compared with the clinical impression of the surgeonArch Surg1351703CrossRefPubMed
25.
Sosa, J, Gardner, B 1993Management of patients diagnosed as acute intestinal obstruction secondary to adhesionsAm Surg591258PubMed
26.
Brolin, RE, Krasna, MJ, Mast, BA 1987Use of tubes and radiographs in the management of small bowel obstructionAnn Surg20612633PubMed
27.
Hofstetter, SR 1981Acute adhesive obstruction of the small intestineSurg Gynecol Obstet1521414PubMed
28.
Bizer, LS, Liebling, RW, Delany, HM,  et al. 1981Small bowel obstruction: the role of nonoperative treatment in simple intestinal obstruction and predictive criteria for strangulation obstructionSurgery8940713PubMed
29.
Biondo, S, Pares, D, Mora, J,  et al. 2003Randomized clinical study of Gastrografin administration in patients with adhesive small bowel obstructionBr J Surg905426CrossRefPubMed
30.
Ko, YT, Lim, JH, Lee, DH,  et al. 1993Small bowel obstruction: sonographic evaluationRadiology18864953PubMed
31.
Ogata, M, Imai, S, Hosotani, R,  et al. 1994Abdominal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of strangulation in small bowel obstructionBr J Surg814214PubMed
32.
Okada, T, Yoshida, H, Iwai, J,  et al. 2001Pulsed Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of strangulation in small bowel obstructionJ Pediatr Surg364305CrossRefPubMed
33.
Bland, KI 1996Abdominal sonography for the diagnosis of bowel obstructionAnn Surg2232356PubMed
34.
Berlin, SC, Goske, MJ, Obuchowski, N,  et al. 1998Small bowel obstruction in rats: diagnostic accuracy of sonography versus radiographyJ Ultrasound Med17497504PubMed
35.
Snyder, JR 1989The pathophysiology of intestinal damage: effects of luminal distension and ischemiaVeter Clin North Am Equine Pract524770
36.
Chappuis CW, Cohn I Jr. Intestinal obstruction. In: Fielding ML, Welch PJ, Moore FD, eds. Clinical surgery international. Vol 13. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987:32
37.
Gibo, M, Murayama, S, Murata, S,  et al. 2002Small-bowel wall thickening related to a long intestinal tube: incidental CT finding mimicking a pathologic conditionJ Comput Assist Tomogr265059CrossRefPubMed
38.
Delabrousse, E, Destrumelle, N, Brunelle, S,  et al. 2003CT of small bowel obstruction in adultsAbdom Imaging2825766CrossRefPubMed
39.
Torreggiani, WC, Harris, AC, Lyburn, ID,  et al. 2003Computed tomography of acute small bowel obstruction: pictorial essayCan Assoc Radiol J54939PubMed
40.
41.
Matsuoka, H, Takahara, T, Masaki, T,  et al. 2002Preoperative evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with bowel obstructionAm J Surg1836147CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Progressive Increase of Bowel Wall Thickness Is a Reliable Indicator for Surgery in Patients With Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
Authors
Shyr-Chyr Chen, M.D.
Chien-Chang Lee, M.D., M.Sc.
Chiung-Yuan Hsu, M.D.
Zui-Shen Yen, M.D., M.P.H.
Cheng-Chung Fang, M.D.
Matthew H.-M. Ma, M.D., Ph.D.
Wen-Jone Chen, M.D., Ph.D.
Hong-Shiee Lai, M.D., Ph.D.
Po-Huang Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
Fang-Yue Lin, M.D., Ph.D.
Wei-Jao Chen, M.D., Ph.D.
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 9/2005
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0112-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2005

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 9/2005 Go to the issue

Original Contribution

Vaginal Delivery After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Word of Caution

Current Status

Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis–Vaginal Fistula: A Review

Original Contribution

Intravenous Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Severe Steroid Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: What is the Cost?

Original Contribution

Tumor Site Predicts Outcome After Radiochemotherapy in Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Region: Long-Term Results of 101 Patients

Original Contribution

Is Routine Cavity Drainage Necessary in Karydakis Flap Operation? A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Case Report

Recurrent Sigmoid Volvulus in Pregnancy: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature