Top

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine

Published in:

01-08-2020 | Breast Cancer | Original Paper

Using Facebook Live to Advocate Breast Cancer Screening

Authors: Hilda H. Tso, Jay R. Parikh

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2020

Abstract

With current conflicting and confusing screening mammography guidelines between major medical organizations, radiologists have an opportunity to educate and advocate for patients using the power of social media. The authors provide a brief overview on the impact of social media in radiology, in particular Facebook, as well as challenges encountered by radiologists as they establish an online presence, and how to effectively use Facebook Live to advocate for screening mammography.

U.S. Breast cancer statistics. 2019; https://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics. Accessed October 12, 2019.

Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Hendrick RE, et al. Breast cancer screening for average-risk women: Recommendations from the acr commission on breast imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:1137–43.CrossRef

Kopans DB. Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:299–308.CrossRef

Saadatmand S, Bretveld R, Siesling S, Tilanus-Linthorst MM. Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: Population based study in 173,797 patients. Bmj. 2015;351:h4901.CrossRef

Mariotto AB, Zou Z, Zhang F, Howlader N, Kurian AW, Etzioni R. Can we use survival data from cancer registries to learn about disease recurrence? The case of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27:1332–41.CrossRef

Spillane AJ, Kennedy CW, Gillett DJ, et al. Screen-detected breast cancer compared to symptomatic presentation: An analysis of surgical treatment and end-points of effective mammographic screening. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:398–402.CrossRef

Malmgren JA, Parikh J, Atwood MK, Kaplan HG. Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years. Radiology. 2012;262:797–806.CrossRef

Malmgren JA, Parikh J, Atwood MK, Kaplan HG. Improved prognosis of women aged 75 and older with mammography-detected breast cancer. Radiology. 2014;273:686–94.CrossRef

Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–26, w-236.

10.

Mammography screening: Facts and figures. 2019; https://www.sbi-online.org/endtheconfusion/FactsFigures.aspx. Accessed October 12, 2019.

11.

American cancer society breast cancer screening guideline. 2019; https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/special-coverage/american-cancer-society-breast-cancer-screening-guidelines.html. Accessed October 12, 2019.

12.

Acog revises breast cancer screening guidance: Ob-gyns promote shared decision making. 2017; https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2017/ACOG-Revises-Breast-Cancer-Screening-Guidance%2D%2DObGyns-Promote-Shared-Decision-Making?IsMobileSet=false. Accessed October 12, 2019.

13.

Boroumand G, Teberian I, Parker L, Rao VM, Levin DC. Screening mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Utilization updates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:1092–96.CrossRef

14.

Jiang M, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Screening mammography rates in the medicare population before and after the 2009 U.S. Preventive services task force guideline change: An interrupted time series analysis. Womens Health Issues. 2015;25:239–45.CrossRef

15.

Sharpe RE, Jr., Levin DC, Parker L, Rao VM. The effect of the controversial us preventive services task force recommendations on the use of screening mammography. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:e58–e61.CrossRef

16.

Siu AL. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:279–96.CrossRef

17.

New acr and sbi breast cancer screening guidelines call for significant changes to screening process. 2018; https://www.acr.org/Media-Center/ACR-News-Releases/2018/New-ACR-and-SBI-Breast-Cancer-Screening-Guidelines-Call-for-Significant-Changes-to-Screening-Process. Accessed October 12, 2019.

18.

Squiers LB, Holden DJ, Dolina SE, Kim AE, Bann CM, Renaud JM. The public’s response to the U.S. Preventive services task force’s 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:497–504.CrossRef

19.

Haas JS, Sprague BL, Klabunde CN, et al. Provider attitudes and screening practices following changes in breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:52–9.CrossRef

20.

Schattner E. Correcting a decade of negative news about mammography. Clin Imaging. 2019.

21.

Fedewa SA, de Moor JS, Ward EM, et al. Mammography use and physician recommendation after the 2009 U.S. Preventive services task force breast cancer screening recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50:e123–e31.CrossRef

22.

Berenbaum F. The social (media) side to rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10:314–8.CrossRef

23.

Pathiraja F, Little D. Social media: The next frontier in radiology. Clin Radiol. 2015;70:585–7.CrossRef

24.

Eckler P, Worsowicz G, Rayburn JW. Social media and health care: An overview. Pm r. 2010;2:1046–50.CrossRef

25.

Kassamali RH, Palkhi EY, Hoey ET. Social media in clinical radiology: Have you updated your status? Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015;5:491–3.PubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Ranschaert ER, van Ooijen PM, Lee S, Ratib O, Parizel PM. Social media for radiologists: An introduction. Insights Imaging. 2015;6:741–52.CrossRef

27.

Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: Benefits, risks, and best practices. P t. 2014;39:491–520.PubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Pew Research Center. A shifting landscape. 2009; https://www.pewinternet.org/2009/06/11/a-shifting-landscape/. Accessed October 12, 2019.

29.

Tso HH, Parikh JR. Leveraging facebook to brand radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1027–32.CrossRef

30.

Seidel RL, Jalilvand A, Kunjummen J, Gilliland L, Duszak R, Jr. Radiologists and social media: Do not forget about facebook. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:224–28.CrossRef

31.

Prabhu V, Rosenkrantz AB. Enriched audience engagement through twitter: Should more academic radiology departments seize the opportunity? J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:756–9.CrossRef

32.

Tunnecliff J, Ilic D, Morgan P, et al. The acceptability among health researchers and clinicians of social media to translate research evidence to clinical practice: Mixed-methods survey and interview study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e119.CrossRef

33.

Koontz NA, Kamer AP, Dodson SC, et al. Social media utilization at an academic radiology practice. Acad Radiol. 2018;25:111–17.CrossRef

34.

Patel SS, Hawkins CM, Rawson JV, Hoang JK. Professional social networking in radiology: Who is there and what are they doing? Acad Radiol. 2017;24:574–79.CrossRef

35.

Nastasi A, Bryant T, Canner JK, Dredze M, Camp MS, Nagarajan N. Breast cancer screening and social media: A content analysis of evidence use and guideline opinions on twitter. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33:695–702.CrossRef

36.

Crozier-Shaw G, Queally JM, Quinlan JF. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: Quality of online patient information. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e262–e68.CrossRef

37.

Burgess JD, Cameron CM, Cuttle L, Tyack Z, Kimble RM. Inaccurate, inadequate and inconsistent: A content analysis of burn first aid information online. Burns. 2016;42:1671–77.CrossRef

38.

Kotsenas AL, Arce M, Aase L, Timimi FK, Young C, Wald JT. The strategic imperative for the use of social media in health care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:155–61.CrossRef

39.

Pew Research Center. The social life of health information. 2019; https://www.pewinternet.org/2009/06/11/the-social-life-of-health-information/. Accessed Otober 12, 2019.

40.

Kallas P. Top 15 most popular social networking sites and apps [2019]. 2019; https://www.dreamgrow.com/top-15-most-popular-social-networking-sites/. Accessed October 12, 2019.

41.

Perrin A, Anderson M. Share of U.S. Adults using social media, including facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. 2019; https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/. Accessed October 25, 2019.

42.

Shearer E, Grieco E. Americans are wary of the role social media sites play in delivering the news. 2019; https://www.journalism.org/2019/10/02/americans-are-wary-of-the-role-social-media-sites-play-in-delivering-the-news/. Accessed October 12, 2019.

43.

Physicians on facebook 2019; https://www.mdsearch.com/physician-careers/physicians-on-facebook. Accessed October 25, 2019.

44.

Bender JL, Jimenez-Marroquin MC, Jadad AR. Seeking support on facebook: A content analysis of breast cancer groups. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e16.CrossRef

45.

Doyle RJ, Wang N, Anthony D, Borkan J, Shield RR, Goldman RE. Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: Physicians’ perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation. Fam Pract. 2012;29:601–8.CrossRef

46.

Pirtle CJ, Reeder RR, Lehmann CU, Unertl KM, Lorenzi NM. Physician perspectives on training for an ehr implementation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:1318–22.PubMed

47.

Kotsenas AL, Aase L, Arce M, et al. The social media DNA of mayo clinic-and health care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:162–66.CrossRef

48.

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Community guidelines. 2019; https://www.mdanderson.org/about-md-anderson/business-legal/legal-and-policy/legal-statements/privacy-policy/community-guidelines.html. Accessed October 25, 2019.

49.

American College of Radiology. Acr social media. https://www.acr.org/media-center/social-media. Accessed October 12, 2019.

50.

Cabrera D, Roy D, Chisolm MS. Social media scholarship and alternative metrics for academic promotion and tenure. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:135–41.CrossRef

51.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Hipaa guidance materials. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/index.html. Accessed October 25, 2019.

52.

HIPAA Journal. Facebook makes changes to health support groups to better protect users’ privacy. 2019; https://www.hipaajournal.com/facebook-makes-changes-to-health-support-groups-to-better-protect-users-privacy/. Accessed October 25, 2019.

53.

We adhere to the highest security standards. 2019; https://www.facebook.com/workplace/security, October 12, 2019.

54.

Ranschaert ER, Van Ooijen PM, McGinty GB, Parizel PM. Radiologists’ usage of social media: Results of the ransom survey. J Digit Imaging. 2016;29:443–9.CrossRef

55.

Facebook pages: Create a beautiful online home for your business. 2019; https://www.facebook.com/business/pages. Accessed October 25, 2019.

56.

Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Dyrbye LN, et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general us working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1600–13.CrossRef

57.

Hootsuite. Hootsuite for health care: The health care industry’s leading social media management platform. 2019; https://hootsuite.com/industries/health-care. Accessed October 25, 2019.

58.

Lua A. The 25 top social media management tools for businesses of all sizes. 2109; https://buffer.com/library/social-media-management-tools. Accessed October 25, 2019.

59.

Facebook live video: The complete guide to live-streaming for business. 2018; https://blog.hootsuite.com/facebook-live-video/. Accessed October 12, 2019.

60.

Tips for using facebook live. 2017; https://www.facebook.com/facebookmedia/blog/tips-for-using-live. Accessed October 12, 2019.

61.

Use live with to create a two-person broadcast. 2019; https://www.facebook.com/help/publisher/616974845361238. Accessed October 12, 2019.

Title: Using Facebook Live to Advocate Breast Cancer Screening
Authors: Hilda H. Tso
Jay R. Parikh
Publication date: 01-08-2020
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Keywords: Breast Cancer
Mammography
Breast Cancer
Mammography
Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-020-00340-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Using Facebook Live to Advocate Breast Cancer Screening

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Is a Picture Really Worth More than a Thousand Words? Which Instagram Post Types Elicit the Best Response for Radiology Education

Tumor Segmentation and Feature Extraction from Whole-Body FDG-PET/CT Using Cascaded 2D and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks

An Embedded Multi-branch 3D Convolution Neural Network for False Positive Reduction in Lung Nodule Detection

An Open-Source, Vender Agnostic Hardware and Software Pipeline for Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology Workflow

A Weak and Semi-supervised Segmentation Method for Prostate Cancer in TRUS Images

Skin Lesion Segmentation with Improved Convolutional Neural Network