Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2020

01-04-2020 | Positron Emission Tomography

Performance Comparison of Individual and Ensemble CNN Models for the Classification of Brain 18F-FDG-PET Scans

Authors: Tomomi Nobashi, Claudia Zacharias, Jason K. Ellis, Valentina Ferri, Mary Ellen Koran, Benjamin L. Franc, Andrei Iagaru, Guido A. Davidzon

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The high-background glucose metabolism of normal gray matter on [18F]-fluoro-2-D-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) of the brain results in a low signal-to-background ratio, potentially increasing the possibility of missing important findings in patients with intracranial malignancies. To explore the strategy of using a deep learning classifier to aid in distinguishing normal versus abnormal findings on PET brain images, this study evaluated the performance of a two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D-CNN) to classify FDG PET brain scans as normal (N) or abnormal (A). Methods: Two hundred eighty-nine brain FDG-PET scans (N; n = 150, A; n = 139) resulting in a total of 68,260 images were included. Nine individual 2D-CNN models with three different window settings for axial, coronal, and sagittal axes were trained and validated. The performance of these individual and ensemble models was evaluated and compared using a test dataset. Odds ratio, Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), and area under curve (AUC) on receiver-operative-characteristic curve, accuracy, and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. Results: An optimal window setting to classify normal and abnormal scans was different for each axis of the individual models. An ensembled model using different axes with an optimized window setting (window-triad) showed better performance than ensembled models using the same axis and different windows settings (axis-triad). Increase in odds ratio and decrease in SD were observed in both axis-triad and window-triad models compared with individual models, whereas improvements of AUC and AIC were seen in window-triad models. An overall model averaging the probabilities of all individual models showed the best accuracy of 82.0%. Conclusions: Data ensemble using different window settings and axes was effective to improve 2D-CNN performance parameters for the classification of brain FDG-PET scans. If prospectively validated with a larger cohort of patients, similar models could provide decision support in a clinical setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jadvar H, Colletti PM, Delgado-Bolton R et al.: Appropriate use criteria for 18F-FDG PET/CT in restaging and treatment response assessment of malignant disease. J Nucl Med. 58:2026–2037, 2017CrossRef Jadvar H, Colletti PM, Delgado-Bolton R et al.: Appropriate use criteria for 18F-FDG PET/CT in restaging and treatment response assessment of malignant disease. J Nucl Med. 58:2026–2037, 2017CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, Fuchs T, Kolla S, Reede D: Interpretive error in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 208:739–749, 2017CrossRef Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, Fuchs T, Kolla S, Reede D: Interpretive error in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 208:739–749, 2017CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nishie A, Kakihara D, Nojo T et al.: Current radiologist workload and the shortages in Japan: How many full-time radiologists are required? Jpn J Radiol. 33:266–272, 2015CrossRef Nishie A, Kakihara D, Nojo T et al.: Current radiologist workload and the shortages in Japan: How many full-time radiologists are required? Jpn J Radiol. 33:266–272, 2015CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wong TZ, van der Westhuizen GJ, Coleman RE: Positron emission tomography imaging of brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 12:615–626, 2002CrossRef Wong TZ, van der Westhuizen GJ, Coleman RE: Positron emission tomography imaging of brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 12:615–626, 2002CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE et al.: A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 42:60–88, 2017CrossRef Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE et al.: A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 42:60–88, 2017CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG, Togashi K: Convolutional neural networks: An overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging. 9:611–629, 2018CrossRef Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG, Togashi K: Convolutional neural networks: An overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging. 9:611–629, 2018CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA et al.: Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 542:115–118, 2017CrossRef Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA et al.: Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 542:115–118, 2017CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Causey JL, Zhang J, Ma S et al.: Highly accurate model for prediction of lung nodule malignancy with CT scans. Sci Rep. 8:9286, 2018CrossRef Causey JL, Zhang J, Ma S et al.: Highly accurate model for prediction of lung nodule malignancy with CT scans. Sci Rep. 8:9286, 2018CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bernal J, Kushibar K, Asfaw DS et al.: Deep convolutional neural networks for brain image analysis on magnetic resonance imaging: A review. Artif Intell Med. 95:64–81, 2019CrossRef Bernal J, Kushibar K, Asfaw DS et al.: Deep convolutional neural networks for brain image analysis on magnetic resonance imaging: A review. Artif Intell Med. 95:64–81, 2019CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chen MC, Ball RL, Yang L et al.: Deep learning to classify radiology free-text reports. Radiology. 286:845–852, 2018CrossRef Chen MC, Ball RL, Yang L et al.: Deep learning to classify radiology free-text reports. Radiology. 286:845–852, 2018CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Abe O, Kiryu S: Deep learning for staging liver fibrosis on CT: A pilot study. Eur Radiol. 28:4578–4585, 2018CrossRef Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A, Abe O, Kiryu S: Deep learning for staging liver fibrosis on CT: A pilot study. Eur Radiol. 28:4578–4585, 2018CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhou Z, Zhao G, Kijowski R, Liu F: Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of knee joint anatomy. Magn Reson Med. 80:2759–2770, 2018CrossRef Zhou Z, Zhao G, Kijowski R, Liu F: Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of knee joint anatomy. Magn Reson Med. 80:2759–2770, 2018CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Huo Y, Xu Z, Xiong Y et al.: 3D whole brain segmentation using spatially localized atlas network tiles. NeuroImage. 194:105–119, 2019CrossRef Huo Y, Xu Z, Xiong Y et al.: 3D whole brain segmentation using spatially localized atlas network tiles. NeuroImage. 194:105–119, 2019CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Liu M, Cheng D, Yan W: Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Classification of Alzheimer’s disease by combination of convolutional and recurrent neural networks using FDG-PET images. Front. Neuroinformatics. 12:35, 2018CrossRef Liu M, Cheng D, Yan W: Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Classification of Alzheimer’s disease by combination of convolutional and recurrent neural networks using FDG-PET images. Front. Neuroinformatics. 12:35, 2018CrossRef
15.
go back to reference He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J: Deep residual learning for image recognition. ArXiv e-prints arXiv:1512.03385, 2015 He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J: Deep residual learning for image recognition. ArXiv e-prints arXiv:1512.03385, 2015
16.
go back to reference Michael SH, Rodney JH: How we read oncologic FDG PET/CT. Cancer Imaging. 16:35, 2016CrossRef Michael SH, Rodney JH: How we read oncologic FDG PET/CT. Cancer Imaging. 16:35, 2016CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Krell MM, Su KK: Rotational data augmentation for electroencephalographic data. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf. 2017:471–474, 2017 Krell MM, Su KK: Rotational data augmentation for electroencephalographic data. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf. 2017:471–474, 2017
18.
go back to reference Costa AC, Oliveira HCR, Catani JH, de Barros N, Melo CFE, Vieira MAC: Data augmentation for detection of architectural distortion in digital mammography using deep learning approach. ArXiv e-prints arXiv:1807.03167, 2018 Costa AC, Oliveira HCR, Catani JH, de Barros N, Melo CFE, Vieira MAC: Data augmentation for detection of architectural distortion in digital mammography using deep learning approach. ArXiv e-prints arXiv:1807.03167, 2018
19.
go back to reference Lakhani P, Sundaram B: Deep learning at chest radiography: Automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology. 284:574–582, 2017CrossRef Lakhani P, Sundaram B: Deep learning at chest radiography: Automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology. 284:574–582, 2017CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rajaraman S, Jaeger S, Antani SK: Performance evaluation of deep neural ensembles toward malaria parasite detection in thin-blood smear images. PeerJ. 7:e6977, 2019CrossRef Rajaraman S, Jaeger S, Antani SK: Performance evaluation of deep neural ensembles toward malaria parasite detection in thin-blood smear images. PeerJ. 7:e6977, 2019CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lyksborg M, Puonti O, Agn M, Larsen R: An ensemble of 2D convolutional neural networks for tumor segmentation. In: Paulsen RR, Pedersen KS Eds. Image Analysis. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 201–211CrossRef Lyksborg M, Puonti O, Agn M, Larsen R: An ensemble of 2D convolutional neural networks for tumor segmentation. In: Paulsen RR, Pedersen KS Eds. Image Analysis. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 201–211CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wei L, Yang Y, Nishikawa RM, Jiang Y: A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 24:371–380, 2005CrossRef Wei L, Yang Y, Nishikawa RM, Jiang Y: A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 24:371–380, 2005CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Performance Comparison of Individual and Ensemble CNN Models for the Classification of Brain 18F-FDG-PET Scans
Authors
Tomomi Nobashi
Claudia Zacharias
Jason K. Ellis
Valentina Ferri
Mary Ellen Koran
Benjamin L. Franc
Andrei Iagaru
Guido A. Davidzon
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00289-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2020 Go to the issue