Top

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine

Published in:

01-04-2019 | EDITORIAL

Writing Systematic Reviews of the Literature—It Really Is a Systematic Process!

Author: Elizabeth A. Krupinski

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 2/2019

Excerpt

Editorial …

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. http://training.cochrane.org/handbook. Last accessed December 27, 2017.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Last accessed December 27, 2017.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100, 2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLos Med 6(7):e1000097, 2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

da Costa BR, Cevallos M, Altman DG, Rutjes AW, Egger M: Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ open 1(1):e000048, 2011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

STROBE: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=strobe-home. Last accessed December 27, 2017.

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Last accessed December 27, 2017.

NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/cohort. Last accessed December 27, 2017.

Cochrane’s Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). http://methods.cochrane.org/bias/risk-bias-non-randomized-studies-interventions. Last accessed December 27, 2017.

10.

Cochrane’s Risk of Bias in Randomized Studies of Interventions (RoB 2.0). http://training.cochrane.org/resource/rob-20-webinar. Last accessed December 27, 2017.

11.

Garner P, Hopewell S, Chandler J, MacLehose H, Schunemann HJ, Aki EA et al.: When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist. Br Med J 354:i3507, 2016CrossRef

Title: Writing Systematic Reviews of the Literature—It Really Is a Systematic Process!
Author: Elizabeth A. Krupinski
Publication date: 01-04-2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-00176-x

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Writing Systematic Reviews of the Literature—It Really Is a Systematic Process!

Excerpt

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Lung Nodule Manager App Review

Anthropometer3D: Automatic Multi-Slice Segmentation Software for the Measurement of Anthropometric Parameters from CT of PET/CT

Radiomics in RayPlus: a Web-Based Tool for Texture Analysis in Medical Images

Integrating Active Learning and Transfer Learning for Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Video Interpretation

Automatic Vertebrae Localization and Identification by Combining Deep SSAE Contextual Features and Structured Regression Forest

Integrating an Ontology of Radiology Differential Diagnosis with ICD-10-CM, RadLex, and SNOMED CT