Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017

Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions

Authors: Zeynettin Akkus, Alfiia Galimzianova, Assaf Hoogi, Daniel L. Rubin, Bradley J. Erickson

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of brain MRI is routine for many neurological diseases and conditions and relies on accurate segmentation of structures of interest. Deep learning-based segmentation approaches for brain MRI are gaining interest due to their self-learning and generalization ability over large amounts of data. As the deep learning architectures are becoming more mature, they gradually outperform previous state-of-the-art classical machine learning algorithms. This review aims to provide an overview of current deep learning-based segmentation approaches for quantitative brain MRI. First we review the current deep learning architectures used for segmentation of anatomical brain structures and brain lesions. Next, the performance, speed, and properties of deep learning approaches are summarized and discussed. Finally, we provide a critical assessment of the current state and identify likely future developments and trends.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.CrossRefPubMed Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lin D, Vasilakos AV, Tang Y, Yao Y: Neural networks for computer-aided diagnosis in medicine: A review. Neurocomputing 216:700–708, 2016CrossRef Lin D, Vasilakos AV, Tang Y, Yao Y: Neural networks for computer-aided diagnosis in medicine: A review. Neurocomputing 216:700–708, 2016CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kooi T et al.: Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med. Image Anal. 35:303–312, 2017CrossRefPubMed Kooi T et al.: Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med. Image Anal. 35:303–312, 2017CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cheng J-Z et al.: Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: Applications to breast lesions in US images and pulmonary nodules in CT scans. Sci. Rep. 6:24454, 2016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheng J-Z et al.: Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: Applications to breast lesions in US images and pulmonary nodules in CT scans. Sci. Rep. 6:24454, 2016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Y. LeCun et al., “Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition,” Neural Comput., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 541–551, 1989.CrossRef Y. LeCun et al., “Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition,” Neural Comput., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 541–551, 1989.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Deng J, et al.: “ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 I.E. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. Deng J, et al.: “ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 I.E. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.
8.
go back to reference O. Russakovsky et al., “ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge,” Int. J. Comput. Vis., vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 211–252, 2015.CrossRef O. Russakovsky et al., “ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge,” Int. J. Comput. Vis., vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 211–252, 2015.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Pereira F, Burges CJC, Bottou L, Weinberger KQ Eds. Advances in neural information processing systems 25. USA: Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 1097–1105 Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Pereira F, Burges CJC, Bottou L, Weinberger KQ Eds. Advances in neural information processing systems 25. USA: Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 1097–1105
10.
go back to reference He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J: “Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification,” in 2015 I.E. International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J: “Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification,” in 2015 I.E. International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015.
11.
go back to reference G. P. Mazzara, R. P. Velthuizen, J. L. Pearlman, H. M. Greenberg, and H. Wagner, “Brain tumor target volume determination for radiation treatment planning through automated MRI segmentation,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 300–312, 2004.CrossRefPubMed G. P. Mazzara, R. P. Velthuizen, J. L. Pearlman, H. M. Greenberg, and H. Wagner, “Brain tumor target volume determination for radiation treatment planning through automated MRI segmentation,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 300–312, 2004.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference S. K. Warfield, K. H. Zou, and W. M. Wells, “Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): An algorithm for the validation of image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 903–921, 2004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral S. K. Warfield, K. H. Zou, and W. M. Wells, “Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): An algorithm for the validation of image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 903–921, 2004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference A. Akhondi-Asl, L. Hoyte, M. E. Lockhart, and S. K. Warfield, “A logarithmic opinion pool based STAPLE algorithm for the fusion of segmentations with associated reliability weights,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1997–2009, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral A. Akhondi-Asl, L. Hoyte, M. E. Lockhart, and S. K. Warfield, “A logarithmic opinion pool based STAPLE algorithm for the fusion of segmentations with associated reliability weights,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1997–2009, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference A. Klein et al., “Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration,” Neuroimage, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 786–802, 2009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral A. Klein et al., “Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration,” Neuroimage, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 786–802, 2009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference S. M. Smith, “Fast robust automated brain extraction,” Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 143–155, 2002.CrossRefPubMed S. M. Smith, “Fast robust automated brain extraction,” Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 143–155, 2002.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference J. E. Iglesias, C.-Y. Liu, P. M. Thompson, and Z. Tu, “Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1617–1634, 2011.CrossRefPubMed J. E. Iglesias, C.-Y. Liu, P. M. Thompson, and Z. Tu, “Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1617–1634, 2011.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference J. Ashburner and K. J. Friston, “Unified segmentation,” Neuroimage, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 839–851, 2005.CrossRefPubMed J. Ashburner and K. J. Friston, “Unified segmentation,” Neuroimage, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 839–851, 2005.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference U. Vovk, F. Pernus, and B. Likar, “A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 405–421, 2007.CrossRefPubMed U. Vovk, F. Pernus, and B. Likar, “A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 405–421, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference L. G. Nyúl and J. K. Udupa, “On standardizing the MR image intensity scale,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1072–1081, 1999.CrossRefPubMed L. G. Nyúl and J. K. Udupa, “On standardizing the MR image intensity scale,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1072–1081, 1999.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference P. Coupe, P. Yger, S. Prima, P. Hellier, C. Kervrann, and C. Barillot, “An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 425–441, 2008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral P. Coupe, P. Yger, S. Prima, P. Hellier, C. Kervrann, and C. Barillot, “An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 425–441, 2008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Kamnitsas K et al.: Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 36:61–78, 2016CrossRefPubMed Kamnitsas K et al.: Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 36:61–78, 2016CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pereira S, Pinto A, Alves V, Silva CA: “Brain Tumor Segmentation using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Mar. 2016. Pereira S, Pinto A, Alves V, Silva CA: “Brain Tumor Segmentation using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Mar. 2016.
23.
go back to reference G. Wu, M. Kim, Q. Wang, Y. Gao, S. Liao, and D. Shen, “Unsupervised deep feature learning for deformable registration of MR brain images,” Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., vol. 16, no. Pt 2, pp. 649–656, 2013.PubMedPubMedCentral G. Wu, M. Kim, Q. Wang, Y. Gao, S. Liao, and D. Shen, “Unsupervised deep feature learning for deformable registration of MR brain images,” Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., vol. 16, no. Pt 2, pp. 649–656, 2013.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Kleesiek J et al.: Deep MRI brain extraction: A 3D convolutional neural network for skull stripping. Neuroimage 129:460–469, 2016CrossRefPubMed Kleesiek J et al.: Deep MRI brain extraction: A 3D convolutional neural network for skull stripping. Neuroimage 129:460–469, 2016CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Gondara L: “Medical image denoising using convolutional denoising autoencoders,” arXiv [cs.CV], 2016. Gondara L: “Medical image denoising using convolutional denoising autoencoders,” arXiv [cs.CV], 2016.
26.
go back to reference Havaei M et al.: Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks. Med. Image Anal. 35:18–31, 2016CrossRefPubMed Havaei M et al.: Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks. Med. Image Anal. 35:18–31, 2016CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference P. Moeskops et al., “Automatic segmentation of MR brain images with a convolutional neural network,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1252–1261, 2016.CrossRefPubMed P. Moeskops et al., “Automatic segmentation of MR brain images with a convolutional neural network,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1252–1261, 2016.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Akkus Z, et al.: “Predicting 1p19q Chromosomal Deletion of Low-Grade Gliomas from MR Images using Deep Learning,” arXiv [cs.CV], 2016. Akkus Z, et al.: “Predicting 1p19q Chromosomal Deletion of Low-Grade Gliomas from MR Images using Deep Learning,” arXiv [cs.CV], 2016.
30.
go back to reference Nie D, Dong N, Li W, Yaozong G, Dinggang S: “Fully convolutional networks for multi-modality isointense infant brain image segmentation,” in 2016 I.E. 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2016. Nie D, Dong N, Li W, Yaozong G, Dinggang S: “Fully convolutional networks for multi-modality isointense infant brain image segmentation,” in 2016 I.E. 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2016.
31.
go back to reference T. Brosch et al., “Deep 3D convolutional encoder networks with shortcuts for multiscale feature integration applied to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1229–1239, 2016.CrossRefPubMed T. Brosch et al., “Deep 3D convolutional encoder networks with shortcuts for multiscale feature integration applied to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1229–1239, 2016.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Q. Dou et al., “Automatic detection of cerebral Microbleeds from MR images via 3D convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1182–1195, 2016.CrossRef Q. Dou et al., “Automatic detection of cerebral Microbleeds from MR images via 3D convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1182–1195, 2016.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Srhoj-Egekher V, Manon JN, Viergever MA, Išgum I: “Automatic neonatal brain tissue segmentation with MRI,” in Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, 2013. Srhoj-Egekher V, Manon JN, Viergever MA, Išgum I: “Automatic neonatal brain tissue segmentation with MRI,” in Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, 2013.
35.
go back to reference H. A. Vrooman et al., “Multi-spectral brain tissue segmentation using automatically trained k-nearest-neighbor classification,” Neuroimage, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 2007.CrossRefPubMed H. A. Vrooman et al., “Multi-spectral brain tissue segmentation using automatically trained k-nearest-neighbor classification,” Neuroimage, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 2007.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference A. Makropoulos et al., “Automatic whole brain MRI segmentation of the developing neonatal brain,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1818–1831, 2014.CrossRefPubMed A. Makropoulos et al., “Automatic whole brain MRI segmentation of the developing neonatal brain,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1818–1831, 2014.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Wang L et al.: LINKS: Learning-based multi-source IntegratioN frameworK for segmentation of infant brain images. Neuroimage 108:160–172, 2015CrossRefPubMed Wang L et al.: LINKS: Learning-based multi-source IntegratioN frameworK for segmentation of infant brain images. Neuroimage 108:160–172, 2015CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Moeskops P et al.: Automatic segmentation of MR brain images of preterm infants using supervised classification. Neuroimage 118:628–641, Sep. 2015CrossRefPubMed Moeskops P et al.: Automatic segmentation of MR brain images of preterm infants using supervised classification. Neuroimage 118:628–641, Sep. 2015CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Chiţă SM, Benders M, Moeskops P, Kersbergen KJ, Viergever MA, Išgum I: “Automatic segmentation of the preterm neonatal brain with MRI using supervised classification,” in Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, 2013. Chiţă SM, Benders M, Moeskops P, Kersbergen KJ, Viergever MA, Išgum I: “Automatic segmentation of the preterm neonatal brain with MRI using supervised classification,” in Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, 2013.
40.
go back to reference A. de Brebisson, M. Giovanni: “Deep neural networks for anatomical brain segmentation,” in 2015 I.E. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2015. A. de Brebisson, M. Giovanni: “Deep neural networks for anatomical brain segmentation,” in 2015 I.E. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2015.
41.
go back to reference Bao S, Siqi B, Chung ACS: “Multi-scale structured CNN with label consistency for brain MR image segmentation,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, pp. 1–5, 2016. Bao S, Siqi B, Chung ACS: “Multi-scale structured CNN with label consistency for brain MR image segmentation,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, pp. 1–5, 2016.
42.
go back to reference D. W. Shattuck et al., “Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures,” Neuroimage, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1064–1080, 2008.CrossRefPubMed D. W. Shattuck et al., “Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures,” Neuroimage, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1064–1080, 2008.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference C. H. Sudre, M. J. Cardoso, W. H. Bouvy, G. J. Biessels, J. Barnes, and S. Ourselin, “Bayesian model selection for pathological neuroimaging data applied to white matter lesion segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2079–2102, 2015.CrossRefPubMed C. H. Sudre, M. J. Cardoso, W. H. Bouvy, G. J. Biessels, J. Barnes, and S. Ourselin, “Bayesian model selection for pathological neuroimaging data applied to white matter lesion segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2079–2102, 2015.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference A. Galimzianova, F. Pernuš, B. Likar, and Ž. Špiclin, “Stratified mixture modeling for segmentation of white-matter lesions in brain MR images,” Neuroimage, vol. 124, no. Pt A, pp. 1031–1043, 2016.CrossRefPubMed A. Galimzianova, F. Pernuš, B. Likar, and Ž. Špiclin, “Stratified mixture modeling for segmentation of white-matter lesions in brain MR images,” Neuroimage, vol. 124, no. Pt A, pp. 1031–1043, 2016.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference N. Weiss, D. Rueckert, and A. Rao, “Multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using dictionary learning and sparse coding,” Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., vol. 16, no. Pt 1, pp. 735–742, 2013.PubMed N. Weiss, D. Rueckert, and A. Rao, “Multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using dictionary learning and sparse coding,” Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., vol. 16, no. Pt 1, pp. 735–742, 2013.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Z. Karimaghaloo, H. Rivaz, D. L. Arnold, D. L. Collins, and T. Arbel, “Temporal hierarchical adaptive texture CRF for automatic detection of gadolinium-enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1227–1241, 2015.CrossRefPubMed Z. Karimaghaloo, H. Rivaz, D. L. Arnold, D. L. Collins, and T. Arbel, “Temporal hierarchical adaptive texture CRF for automatic detection of gadolinium-enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1227–1241, 2015.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference X. Tomas-Fernandez and S. K. Warfield, “A model of population and subject (MOPS) intensities with application to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1349–1361, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral X. Tomas-Fernandez and S. K. Warfield, “A model of population and subject (MOPS) intensities with application to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1349–1361, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference N. Shiee, P.-L. Bazin, A. Ozturk, D. S. Reich, P. A. Calabresi, and D. L. Pham, “A topology-preserving approach to the segmentation of brain images with multiple sclerosis lesions,” Neuroimage, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 1524–1535, 2010.CrossRefPubMed N. Shiee, P.-L. Bazin, A. Ozturk, D. S. Reich, P. A. Calabresi, and D. L. Pham, “A topology-preserving approach to the segmentation of brain images with multiple sclerosis lesions,” Neuroimage, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 1524–1535, 2010.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference M. Prastawa, E. Bullitt, S. Ho, and G. Gerig, “A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 2004.CrossRefPubMed M. Prastawa, E. Bullitt, S. Ho, and G. Gerig, “A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 2004.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference S. Bauer, R. Wiest, L.-P. Nolte, and M. Reyes, “A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 58, no. 13, pp. R97–129, 2013.CrossRefPubMed S. Bauer, R. Wiest, L.-P. Nolte, and M. Reyes, “A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 58, no. 13, pp. R97–129, 2013.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference X. Lladó et al., “Automated detection of multiple sclerosis lesions in serial brain MRI,” Neuroradiology, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 787–807, 2012.CrossRefPubMed X. Lladó et al., “Automated detection of multiple sclerosis lesions in serial brain MRI,” Neuroradiology, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 787–807, 2012.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference D. García-Lorenzo, S. Francis, S. Narayanan, D. L. Arnold, and D. L. Collins, “Review of automatic segmentation methods of multiple sclerosis white matter lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2013.CrossRefPubMed D. García-Lorenzo, S. Francis, S. Narayanan, D. L. Arnold, and D. L. Collins, “Review of automatic segmentation methods of multiple sclerosis white matter lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2013.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Zhao L, Jia K: “Deep Feature Learning with Discrimination Mechanism for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Diagnosis,” in 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing (IIH-MSP), 2015. Zhao L, Jia K: “Deep Feature Learning with Discrimination Mechanism for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Diagnosis,” in 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing (IIH-MSP), 2015.
54.
go back to reference Dvořák P, Pavel D, Bjoern M: “Local Structure Prediction with Convolutional Neural Networks for Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp. 59–71, 2016. Dvořák P, Pavel D, Bjoern M: “Local Structure Prediction with Convolutional Neural Networks for Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp. 59–71, 2016.
55.
go back to reference O. Maier, C. Schröder, N. D. Forkert, T. Martinetz, and H. Handels, “Classifiers for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation: A comparison study,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 12, p. e0145118, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O. Maier, C. Schröder, N. D. Forkert, T. Martinetz, and H. Handels, “Classifiers for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation: A comparison study,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 12, p. e0145118, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
go back to reference Havaei M, Guizard N, Larochelle H, Jodoin PM: “Deep Learning Trends for Focal Brain Pathology Segmentation in MRI,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp. 125–148, 2016. Havaei M, Guizard N, Larochelle H, Jodoin PM: “Deep Learning Trends for Focal Brain Pathology Segmentation in MRI,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp. 125–148, 2016.
57.
go back to reference B. H. Menze et al., “The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS),” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1993–2024, 2015.CrossRefPubMed B. H. Menze et al., “The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS),” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1993–2024, 2015.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Cho J, Lee K, Shin E, Choy G, Do S: “How much data is needed to train a medical image deep learning system to achieve necessary high accuracy?,” arXiv [cs.LG], 2015. Cho J, Lee K, Shin E, Choy G, Do S: “How much data is needed to train a medical image deep learning system to achieve necessary high accuracy?,” arXiv [cs.LG], 2015.
59.
go back to reference Lekadir K, et al.: “A Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Characterization of Plaque Composition in Carotid Ultrasound,” IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2016. Lekadir K, et al.: “A Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Characterization of Plaque Composition in Carotid Ultrasound,” IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2016.
60.
go back to reference Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T: “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in 2015 I.E. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T: “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in 2015 I.E. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015.
61.
go back to reference Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H: How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In: Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, Lawrence ND, Weinberger KQ Eds. Advances in neural information processing systems 27. USA: Curran Associates, Inc., 2014, pp. 3320–3328 Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H: How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In: Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, Lawrence ND, Weinberger KQ Eds. Advances in neural information processing systems 27. USA: Curran Associates, Inc., 2014, pp. 3320–3328
62.
go back to reference H.-C. Shin et al., “Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1285–1298, 2016.CrossRefPubMed H.-C. Shin et al., “Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1285–1298, 2016.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference van Ginneken B, Setio AAA, Jacobs C, Ciompi F: “Off-the-shelf convolutional neural network features for pulmonary nodule detection in computed tomography scans,” in 2015 I.E. 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2015. van Ginneken B, Setio AAA, Jacobs C, Ciompi F: “Off-the-shelf convolutional neural network features for pulmonary nodule detection in computed tomography scans,” in 2015 I.E. 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2015.
Metadata
Title
Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions
Authors
Zeynettin Akkus
Alfiia Galimzianova
Assaf Hoogi
Daniel L. Rubin
Bradley J. Erickson
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2017 Go to the issue