Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2017

01-10-2017

Enterprise Implementation of Digital Pathology: Feasibility, Challenges, and Opportunities

Authors: DJ Hartman, L Pantanowitz, JS McHugh, AL Piccoli, MJ OLeary, GR Lauro

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Digital pathology is becoming technically possible to implement for routine pathology work. At our institution, we have been using digital pathology for second opinion intraoperative consultations for over 10 years. Herein, we describe our experience in converting to a digital pathology platform for primary pathology diagnosis. We implemented an incremental rollout for digital pathology on subspecialty benches, beginning with cases that contained small amounts of tissue (biopsy specimens). We successfully scanned over 40,000 slides through our digital pathology system. Several lessons (both challenges and opportunities) were learned through this implementation. A successful conversion to digital pathology requires pre-imaging adjustments, integrated software and post-imaging evaluations.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Thorstenson S, Molin J, Lundstrom C. Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: Digital pathology experiences 2006-2013. Journal of pathology informatics. 2014;5(1):14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thorstenson S, Molin J, Lundstrom C. Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: Digital pathology experiences 2006-2013. Journal of pathology informatics. 2014;5(1):14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Goacher E, Randell R, Williams B, Treanor D 2016. The Diagnostic Concordance of Whole Slide Imaging and Light Microscopy: A Systematic Review. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. Goacher E, Randell R, Williams B, Treanor D 2016. The Diagnostic Concordance of Whole Slide Imaging and Light Microscopy: A Systematic Review. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
4.
go back to reference Snead DR, Tsang YW, Meskiri A, Kimani PK, Crossman R, Rajpoot NM, et al. Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis. Histopathology. 2016;68(7):1063–72.CrossRefPubMed Snead DR, Tsang YW, Meskiri A, Kimani PK, Crossman R, Rajpoot NM, et al. Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis. Histopathology. 2016;68(7):1063–72.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Al-Janabi S, Huisman A, Van Diest PJ. Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives. Histopathology. 2012;61(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed Al-Janabi S, Huisman A, Van Diest PJ. Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives. Histopathology. 2012;61(1):1–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pantanowitz L. Digital images and the future of digital pathology. Journal of pathology informatics. 2010;1. Pantanowitz L. Digital images and the future of digital pathology. Journal of pathology informatics. 2010;1.
7.
go back to reference Romero Lauro G, Cable W, Lesniak A, Tseytlin E, McHugh J, Parwani A, et al. Digital pathology consultations-a new era in digital imaging, challenges and practical applications. Journal of digital imaging. 2013;26(4):668–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Romero Lauro G, Cable W, Lesniak A, Tseytlin E, McHugh J, Parwani A, et al. Digital pathology consultations-a new era in digital imaging, challenges and practical applications. Journal of digital imaging. 2013;26(4):668–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Pantanowitz L, Valenstein PN, Evans AJ, Kaplan KJ, Pfeifer JD, Wilbur DC, et al. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. Journal of pathology informatics. 2011;2:36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pantanowitz L, Valenstein PN, Evans AJ, Kaplan KJ, Pfeifer JD, Wilbur DC, et al. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. Journal of pathology informatics. 2011;2:36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Stathonikos N, Veta M, Huisman A, van Diest PJ. Going fully digital: Perspective of a Dutch academic pathology lab. Journal of pathology informatics. 2013;4:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stathonikos N, Veta M, Huisman A, van Diest PJ. Going fully digital: Perspective of a Dutch academic pathology lab. Journal of pathology informatics. 2013;4:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Higgins C. Applications and challenges of digital pathology and whole slide imaging. Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission. 2015;90(5):341–7.CrossRef Higgins C. Applications and challenges of digital pathology and whole slide imaging. Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission. 2015;90(5):341–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Guo H, Birsa J, Farahani N, Hartman DJ, Piccoli A, O'Leary M, et al. Digital pathology and anatomic pathology laboratory information system integration to support digital pathology sign-out. Journal of pathology informatics. 2016;7:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guo H, Birsa J, Farahani N, Hartman DJ, Piccoli A, O'Leary M, et al. Digital pathology and anatomic pathology laboratory information system integration to support digital pathology sign-out. Journal of pathology informatics. 2016;7:23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Cheng CL, Azhar R, Sng SH, Chua YQ, Hwang JS, Chin JP, et al. 2016 Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre. Journal of clinical pathology. Cheng CL, Azhar R, Sng SH, Chua YQ, Hwang JS, Chin JP, et al. 2016 Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre. Journal of clinical pathology.
13.
go back to reference Thrall MJ, Wimmer JL, Schwartz MR. Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2015;139(5):656–64.CrossRef Thrall MJ, Wimmer JL, Schwartz MR. Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2015;139(5):656–64.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Buck TP, Dilorio R, Havrilla L, O'Neill DG. Validation of a whole slide imaging system for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology: A community hospital experience. Journal of pathology informatics. 2014;5(1):43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buck TP, Dilorio R, Havrilla L, O'Neill DG. Validation of a whole slide imaging system for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology: A community hospital experience. Journal of pathology informatics. 2014;5(1):43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Ho J, Ahlers SM, Stratman C, Aridor O, Pantanowitz L, Fine JL, et al. Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization. Journal of pathology informatics. 2014;5(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ho J, Ahlers SM, Stratman C, Aridor O, Pantanowitz L, Fine JL, et al. Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization. Journal of pathology informatics. 2014;5(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Enterprise Implementation of Digital Pathology: Feasibility, Challenges, and Opportunities
Authors
DJ Hartman
L Pantanowitz
JS McHugh
AL Piccoli
MJ OLeary
GR Lauro
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9946-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2017 Go to the issue