Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Review Paper

Workflow Challenges of Enterprise Imaging: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

With the advent of digital cameras, there has been an explosion in the number of medical specialties using images to diagnose or document disease and guide interventions. In many specialties, these images are not added to the patient’s electronic medical record and are not distributed so that other providers caring for the patient can view them. As hospitals begin to develop enterprise imaging strategies, they have found that there are multiple challenges preventing the implementation of systems to manage image capture, image upload, and image management. This HIMSS-SIIM white paper will describe the key workflow challenges related to enterprise imaging and offer suggestions for potential solutions to these challenges.
Literature
1.
Ashique KT, Kaliyadan F, Aurangabadkar SJ: Clinical photography in dermatology using smartphones: an overview. Indian Dermatol Online J 6(3):158–163, 2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Bloemen EM, et al: Photographing injuries in the acute care setting: development and evaluation of a standardized protocol for research, forensics, and clinical practice. Acad Emerg Med 23:653–659, 2016CrossRefPubMed
3.
Broman KK, et al: Apps incorporating clinical photography offer the potential to improve care. Bull Am Coll Surg 101(2):44, 2016PubMed
4.
Gaujoux S, et al: Best practices to optimize intraoperative photography. J Surg Res 201(2):402–407, 2016CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hibler BP, Qi Q, Rossi AM: Current state of imaging in dermatology. Semin Cutan Med Surg 35(1):2–8, 2016CrossRefPubMed
6.
Indu M, et al: Imaging and image management: a survey on current outlook and awareness in pathology practice. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 19(2):153–157, 2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Jamil F: Smartphone photography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(1):104–105, 2016CrossRefPubMed
8.
Jay J: Imaging: taking its rightful place at the enterprise level. Image-enabling the EMR leads to increased productivity and efficiencies. Health Manag Technol 34(5):18–19, 2013PubMed
9.
Kantor J: Skin self-photography for dysplastic nevus monitoring is associated with a decrease in the number of biopsies at follow-up: a retrospective analytical study. J Am Acad Dermatol 73(4):704–705, 2015CrossRefPubMed
10.
Lanska DJ: The dercum-muybridge collaboration and the study of pathologic gaits using sequential photography. J Hist Neurosci 25(1):23–38, 2016CrossRefPubMed
11.
Leung TS, et al: Screening neonatal jaundice based on the sclera color of the eye using digital photography. Biomed Opt Express 6(11):4529–4538, 2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Matamalas A, et al: Validity and reliability of photographic measures to evaluate waistline asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J, 2016
13.
Perna G: Imaging informatics and the enterprise. Healthc Inf 29(3):26–28, 2012
14.
Quigley EA, et al: Technology and technique standards for camera-acquired digital dermatologic images: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol 151(8):883–890, 2015CrossRefPubMed
15.
Raina A, et al: Objective measurement of erythema in psoriasis using digital color photography with color calibration. Skin Res Technol 22:375–380, 2016CrossRefPubMed
16.
Rampy BA, Glassy EF: Pathology gross photography: the beginning of digital pathology. Clin Lab Med 36(1):67–87, 2016CrossRefPubMed
17.
Seo SH, et al: Better understanding of digital photography for skin color measurement: with a special emphasis on light characteristics. Skin Res Technol 17(1):20–25, 2011CrossRefPubMed
18.
Gabison S, et al: A study of the utility and equivalency of 2 methods of wound measurement: digitized tracing versus digital photography. Adv Skin Wound Care 28(6):252–258, 2015CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lynnerup N, Hjalgrim H, Eriksen B: Routine use of ultraviolet light in medicolegal examinations to evaluate stains and skin trauma. Med Sci Law 35(2):165–168, 1995PubMed
20.
Ozkalipci O, Volpellier M: Photographic documentation, a practical guide for non professional forensic photography. Torture 20(1):45–52, 2010PubMed
21.
22.
Kalinski T, et al: Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) as standard in digital pathology. Histopathology 61(1):132–134, 2012CrossRefPubMed
23.
Badano A, et al: Consistency and standardization of color in medical imaging: a consensus report. J Digit Imaging 28(1):41–52, 2015CrossRefPubMed
24.
Nuzzolese E, Di Vella G: The development of a colorimetric scale as a visual aid for the bruise age determination of bite marks and blunt trauma. J Forensic Odontostomatol 30(2):1–6, 2012PubMed
25.
Smoot 3rd, EC, Higgs J: Photographing the patient with burns for medical documentation. J Burn Care Rehabil 15(5):434–437, 1994CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
28.
Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Morin RL: The ACR computed tomography dose index registry: the 5 million examination update. J Am Coll Radiol 10(12):980–983, 2013CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
31.
32.
Vogeley E, Pierce MC, Bertocci G: Experience with wood lamp illumination and digital photography in the documentation of bruises on human skin. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 156(3):265–268, 2002CrossRefPubMed
33.
Means JM, et al: Sharing clinical photographs: patient rights, professional ethics, and institutional responsibilities. Bull Am Coll Surg 100(10):17–22, 2015PubMed
34.
Norweck JT, et al: ACR-AAPM-SIIM technical standard for electronic practice of medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 26(1):38–52, 2013CrossRefPubMed
35.
Stevenson P, Finnane AR, Soyer HP: Teledermatology and clinical photography: safeguarding patient privacy and mitigating medico-legal risk. Med J Aust 204(5):198–200, 2016CrossRefPubMed
36.
Guidance for the submission of premarket notifications for medical image management devices
37.
Mammography quality standards act (MQSA) policy guidance help system
38.
European Society of, R: Usability of irreversible image compression in radiological imaging. A position paper by the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 2(2):103–115, 2011CrossRef
39.
Hsieh C, et al: Patient perception on the usage of smartphones for medical photography and for reference in dermatology. Dermatol Surg 41(1):149–154, 2015CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Workflow Challenges of Enterprise Imaging: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper
Publication date
01-10-2016
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9897-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2016 Go to the issue

Review Paper

Technical Challenges of Enterprise Imaging: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper

ReviewPaper

A Foundation for Enterprise Imaging: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper

OriginalPaper

Real-Time Patient Radiation Dose Monitoring System Used in a Large University Hospital

Review Paper

The Current State and Path Forward For Enterprise Image Viewing: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper

EditorialNotes

Review of Radiology Signs App for Android

OriginalPaper

A Practice Quality Improvement Project: Reducing Dose of Routine Chest CT Imaging in a Busy Clinical Practice