Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2016

01-08-2016

Patient Vertical Centering and Correlation with Radiation Output in Adult Abdominopelvic CT

Author: Phillip M. Cheng

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a significant effect, independent of patient size, of patient vertical centering on the current-modulated CT scanner radiation output in adult abdominopelvic CT. A phantom was used to evaluate calculation of vertical positioning and effective diameter at five different table heights. In addition, 656 consecutive contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic scans using the same protocol and automatic tube current modulation settings on a Philips Brilliance 64 MDCT scanner were retrospectively evaluated. The vertical position of the patient center of mass and the average effective diameter of the scanned patient were computed using the reconstructed images. The average volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) for each scan was recorded. The mean patient center of mass y coordinate ranged from −3.7 to 6.7 cm (mean ± SD, 2.8 ± 1.2 cm), indicating that patients were on average positioned slightly below the scanner isocenter. There was a slight tendency for smaller patients to be mis-centered lower than larger patients. Average CTDIvol closely fit a quadratic regression curve with respect to mean effective diameter. However, the value of the regression coefficient relating CTDIvol to the patient’s vertical position was nearly zero, indicating only a very slight increase in CTDIvol with patient mis-centering for the scanner used in this study. The techniques used here may be useful both for automated evaluation of proper patient positioning in CT and for estimating the radiation dose effects of patient mis-centering for any CT scanner.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harri PA, Moreno CC, Nelson RC, Fani N, Small WC, Duong P-AT, Duong A, Tang X, Applegate KE: Variability of MDCT dose due to technologist performance: impact of posteroanterior versus anteroposterior localizer image and table height with use of automated tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:377–386, 2014CrossRefPubMed Harri PA, Moreno CC, Nelson RC, Fani N, Small WC, Duong P-AT, Duong A, Tang X, Applegate KE: Variability of MDCT dose due to technologist performance: impact of posteroanterior versus anteroposterior localizer image and table height with use of automated tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:377–386, 2014CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, Kortesniemi M: Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:123–130, 2014CrossRefPubMed Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, Kortesniemi M: Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:123–130, 2014CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Larson DB, Strauss KJ, Podberesky DJ: Toward large-scale process control to enable consistent CT radiation dose optimization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:959–966, 2015CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Strauss KJ, Podberesky DJ: Toward large-scale process control to enable consistent CT radiation dose optimization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:959–966, 2015CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Toth T, Ge Z, Daly MP: The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise. Med Phys 34:3093–3101, 2007CrossRefPubMed Toth T, Ge Z, Daly MP: The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise. Med Phys 34:3093–3101, 2007CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Habibzadeh MA, Ay MR, Asl ARK, Ghadiri H, Zaidi H: Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies. Phys Med 28:191–199, 2012CrossRefPubMed Habibzadeh MA, Ay MR, Asl ARK, Ghadiri H, Zaidi H: Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies. Phys Med 28:191–199, 2012CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Li J, Udayasankar UK, Toth TL, Seamans J, Small WC, Kalra MK: Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:547–552, 2007CrossRefPubMed Li J, Udayasankar UK, Toth TL, Seamans J, Small WC, Kalra MK: Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:547–552, 2007CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cheng PM: Automated estimation of abdominal effective diameter for body size normalization of CT dose. J Digit Imaging 26:406–411, 2013CrossRefPubMed Cheng PM: Automated estimation of abdominal effective diameter for body size normalization of CT dose. J Digit Imaging 26:406–411, 2013CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rasband WS: ImageJ. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 2014 Rasband WS: ImageJ. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 2014
9.
go back to reference Python Language Reference, version 2.7, Python Software Foundation, 2015 Python Language Reference, version 2.7, Python Software Foundation, 2015
10.
go back to reference van der Walt S, Colbert SC, Varoquaux G: The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput Sci Eng 13:22–30, 2011CrossRef van der Walt S, Colbert SC, Varoquaux G: The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput Sci Eng 13:22–30, 2011CrossRef
11.
go back to reference R Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015 R Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015
12.
go back to reference Supanich, MP: Tube current modulation by vendor and how to integrate TCM into practice, Phoenix, AZ, 15-Mar-2013 Supanich, MP: Tube current modulation by vendor and how to integrate TCM into practice, Phoenix, AZ, 15-Mar-2013
13.
go back to reference McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF: CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 259:311–316, 2011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF: CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 259:311–316, 2011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Matsubara K, Koshida K, Ichikawa K, Suzuki M, Takata T, Yamamoto T, Matsui O: Misoperation of CT automatic tube current modulation systems with inappropriate patient centering: phantom studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:862–865, 2009CrossRefPubMed Matsubara K, Koshida K, Ichikawa K, Suzuki M, Takata T, Yamamoto T, Matsui O: Misoperation of CT automatic tube current modulation systems with inappropriate patient centering: phantom studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:862–865, 2009CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Lampinen A, Kortesniemi M: Effect of vertical positioning on organ dose, image noise and contrast in pediatric chest CT—phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 43:673–684, 2013CrossRefPubMed Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Lampinen A, Kortesniemi M: Effect of vertical positioning on organ dose, image noise and contrast in pediatric chest CT—phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 43:673–684, 2013CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient Vertical Centering and Correlation with Radiation Output in Adult Abdominopelvic CT
Author
Phillip M. Cheng
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9861-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2016 Go to the issue