Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2016

Open Access 01-04-2016

The Importance of Human–Computer Interaction in Radiology E-learning

Authors: Annemarie M. den Harder, Marissa Frijlingh, Cécile J. Ravesloot, Anne E. Oosterbaan, Anouk van der Gijp

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

With the development of cross-sectional imaging techniques and transformation to digital reading of radiological imaging, e-learning might be a promising tool in undergraduate radiology education. In this systematic review of the literature, we evaluate the emergence of image interaction possibilities in radiology e-learning programs and evidence for effects of radiology e-learning on learning outcomes and perspectives of medical students and teachers. A systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, ERIC, and PsycInfo was performed. Articles were screened by two authors and included when they concerned the evaluation of radiological e-learning tools for undergraduate medical students. Nineteen articles were included. Seven studies evaluated e-learning programs with image interaction possibilities. Students perceived e-learning with image interaction possibilities to be a useful addition to learning with hard copy images and to be effective for learning 3D anatomy. Both e-learning programs with and without image interaction possibilities were found to improve radiological knowledge and skills. In general, students found e-learning programs easy to use, rated image quality high, and found the difficulty level of the courses appropriate. Furthermore, they felt that their knowledge and understanding of radiology improved by using e-learning. In conclusion, the addition of radiology e-learning in undergraduate medical education can improve radiological knowledge and image interpretation skills. Differences between the effect of e-learning with and without image interpretation possibilities on learning outcomes are unknown and should be subject to future research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cheng B, Wang M, Morch A, Chen N, Kinshuk, Spector M: Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educ Res Rev 11:58–72, 2014CrossRef Cheng B, Wang M, Morch A, Chen N, Kinshuk, Spector M: Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educ Res Rev 11:58–72, 2014CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Scarsbrook AF, Graham RN, Perriss RW: Radiology education: a glimpse into the future. Clin Radiol 61(8):640–648, 2006CrossRefPubMed Scarsbrook AF, Graham RN, Perriss RW: Radiology education: a glimpse into the future. Clin Radiol 61(8):640–648, 2006CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pinto A, Selvaggi S, Sicignano G, Vollono E, Iervolino L, Amato F, et al: E-learning tools for education: regulatory aspects, current applications in radiology and future prospects. Radiol Med 113(1):144–157, 2008CrossRefPubMed Pinto A, Selvaggi S, Sicignano G, Vollono E, Iervolino L, Amato F, et al: E-learning tools for education: regulatory aspects, current applications in radiology and future prospects. Radiol Med 113(1):144–157, 2008CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pinto A, Brunese L, Pinto F, Acampora C, Romano L: E-learning and education in radiology. Eur J Radiol 78(3):368–371, 2011CrossRefPubMed Pinto A, Brunese L, Pinto F, Acampora C, Romano L: E-learning and education in radiology. Eur J Radiol 78(3):368–371, 2011CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bowman D, Kruijff E, LaViola J, Poupyrev I Eds: 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice, 1st edition. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Redwood City, 2004 Bowman D, Kruijff E, LaViola J, Poupyrev I Eds: 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice, 1st edition. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Redwood City, 2004
7.
go back to reference Ravesloot CJ, van der Schaaf MF, van Schaik JP, Ten Cate OT, van der Gijp A, Mol CP, et al: Volumetric CT-images improve testing of radiological image interpretation skills. Eur J Radiol 84(5):856–861, 2015 Ravesloot CJ, van der Schaaf MF, van Schaik JP, Ten Cate OT, van der Gijp A, Mol CP, et al: Volumetric CT-images improve testing of radiological image interpretation skills. Eur J Radiol 84(5):856–861, 2015
8.
go back to reference Grunewald M, Heckemann RA, Gebhard H, Lell M, Bautz WA: COMPARE radiology: creating an interactive Web-based training program for radiology with multimedia authoring software. Acad Radiol 10(5):543–553, 2003CrossRefPubMed Grunewald M, Heckemann RA, Gebhard H, Lell M, Bautz WA: COMPARE radiology: creating an interactive Web-based training program for radiology with multimedia authoring software. Acad Radiol 10(5):543–553, 2003CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM: Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA 298(9):1002–1009, 2007CrossRefPubMed Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM: Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA 298(9):1002–1009, 2007CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yardley S, Dornan T: Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’. Med Educ 46(1):97–106, 2012CrossRefPubMed Yardley S, Dornan T: Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’. Med Educ 46(1):97–106, 2012CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, Reed VA: The Kirkpatrick model: a useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. J Intellect Dev Disabil 34(3):266–274, 2009CrossRefPubMed Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, Reed VA: The Kirkpatrick model: a useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. J Intellect Dev Disabil 34(3):266–274, 2009CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Baumann M, Meister M, Schmitt V, Fischer MR: Blended learning in radiology: is self-determined learning really more effective? Eur J Radiol 78(3):384–387, 2011CrossRefPubMed Mahnken AH, Baumann M, Meister M, Schmitt V, Fischer MR: Blended learning in radiology: is self-determined learning really more effective? Eur J Radiol 78(3):384–387, 2011CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Maleck M, Fischer MR, Kammer B, Zeiler C, Mangel E, Schenk F, et al: Do computers teach better? A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology. Radiographics 21(4):1025–1032, 2001CrossRefPubMed Maleck M, Fischer MR, Kammer B, Zeiler C, Mangel E, Schenk F, et al: Do computers teach better? A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology. Radiographics 21(4):1025–1032, 2001CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Arya R, Morrison T, Zumwalt A, Shaffer K: Making education effective and fun: stations-based approach to teaching radiology and anatomy to third-year medical students. Acad Radiol 20(10):1311–1318, 2013CrossRefPubMed Arya R, Morrison T, Zumwalt A, Shaffer K: Making education effective and fun: stations-based approach to teaching radiology and anatomy to third-year medical students. Acad Radiol 20(10):1311–1318, 2013CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ernst RD, Sarai P, Nishino T, Collins T, Oto A, Hernandez A, et al: Transition from film to electronic media in the first-year medical school gross anatomy lab. J Digit Imaging 16(4):337–340, 2003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ernst RD, Sarai P, Nishino T, Collins T, Oto A, Hernandez A, et al: Transition from film to electronic media in the first-year medical school gross anatomy lab. J Digit Imaging 16(4):337–340, 2003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Howlett D, Vincent T, Watson G, Owens E, Webb R, Gainsborough N, et al: Blending online techniques with traditional face to face teaching methods to deliver final year undergraduate radiology learning content. Eur J Radiol 78(3):334–341, 2011CrossRefPubMed Howlett D, Vincent T, Watson G, Owens E, Webb R, Gainsborough N, et al: Blending online techniques with traditional face to face teaching methods to deliver final year undergraduate radiology learning content. Eur J Radiol 78(3):334–341, 2011CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jafri NF, Wu P, Stanfield L, Slanetz PJ: Use of radiologic imaging to enhance physical diagnosis instruction in the preclinical curriculum. Acad Radiol 15(7):942–947, 2008CrossRefPubMed Jafri NF, Wu P, Stanfield L, Slanetz PJ: Use of radiologic imaging to enhance physical diagnosis instruction in the preclinical curriculum. Acad Radiol 15(7):942–947, 2008CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Petersson H, Sinkvist D, Wang C, Smedby O: Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Anat Sci Educ 2(2):61–68, 2009CrossRefPubMed Petersson H, Sinkvist D, Wang C, Smedby O: Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Anat Sci Educ 2(2):61–68, 2009CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rengier F, Hafner MF, Unterhinninghofen R, Nawrotzki R, Kirsch J, Kauczor HU, et al: Integration of interactive three-dimensional image post-processing software into undergraduate radiology education effectively improves diagnostic skills and visual-spatial ability. Eur J Radiol 82(8):1366–1371, 2013CrossRefPubMed Rengier F, Hafner MF, Unterhinninghofen R, Nawrotzki R, Kirsch J, Kauczor HU, et al: Integration of interactive three-dimensional image post-processing software into undergraduate radiology education effectively improves diagnostic skills and visual-spatial ability. Eur J Radiol 82(8):1366–1371, 2013CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shaffer K, Small JE: Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy. Acad Radiol 11(9):1059–1070, 2004CrossRefPubMed Shaffer K, Small JE: Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy. Acad Radiol 11(9):1059–1070, 2004CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Turmezei TD, Tam MD, Loughna S: A survey of medical students on the impact of a new digital imaging library in the dissection room. Clin Anat 22(6):761–769, 2009CrossRefPubMed Turmezei TD, Tam MD, Loughna S: A survey of medical students on the impact of a new digital imaging library in the dissection room. Clin Anat 22(6):761–769, 2009CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bohl M, Francois W, Gest T: Self-guided clinical cases for medical students based on postmortem CT scans of cadavers. Clin Anat 24(5):655–663, 2011CrossRefPubMed Bohl M, Francois W, Gest T: Self-guided clinical cases for medical students based on postmortem CT scans of cadavers. Clin Anat 24(5):655–663, 2011CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Webb AL, Choi S: Interactive radiological anatomy eLearning solution for first year medical students: development, integration, and impact on learning. Anat Sci Educ 7(5):350–360, 2014 Webb AL, Choi S: Interactive radiological anatomy eLearning solution for first year medical students: development, integration, and impact on learning. Anat Sci Educ 7(5):350–360, 2014
24.
go back to reference Wagner M, Heckemann RA, Nomayr A, Greess H, Bautz WA, Grunewald M: COMPARE/Radiology, an interactive Web-based radiology teaching program evaluation of user response. Acad Radiol 12(6):752–760, 2005CrossRefPubMed Wagner M, Heckemann RA, Nomayr A, Greess H, Bautz WA, Grunewald M: COMPARE/Radiology, an interactive Web-based radiology teaching program evaluation of user response. Acad Radiol 12(6):752–760, 2005CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Davison BD, Tello R, Blickman JG: World Wide Web program for optimizing and assessing medical student performance during the radiology clerkship. Acad Radiol 7(4):260–263, 2000CrossRefPubMed Davison BD, Tello R, Blickman JG: World Wide Web program for optimizing and assessing medical student performance during the radiology clerkship. Acad Radiol 7(4):260–263, 2000CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tachakra S, Dutton D: Long-distance education in radiology via a clinical telemedicine system. Telemed J E Health 6(3):361–365, 2000CrossRefPubMed Tachakra S, Dutton D: Long-distance education in radiology via a clinical telemedicine system. Telemed J E Health 6(3):361–365, 2000CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Leong S, Mc Laughlin P, O'Connor OJ, O'Flynn S, Maher MM: An assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of an e-learning module in delivering a curriculum in radiation protection to undergraduate medical students. J Am Coll Radiol 9(3):203–209, 2012CrossRefPubMed Leong S, Mc Laughlin P, O'Connor OJ, O'Flynn S, Maher MM: An assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of an e-learning module in delivering a curriculum in radiation protection to undergraduate medical students. J Am Coll Radiol 9(3):203–209, 2012CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gotthardt M, Siegert MJ, Schlieck A, Schneider S, Kohnert A, Gross MW, et al: How to successfully implement E-learning for both students and teachers. Acad Radiol 13(3):379–390, 2006CrossRefPubMed Gotthardt M, Siegert MJ, Schlieck A, Schneider S, Kohnert A, Gross MW, et al: How to successfully implement E-learning for both students and teachers. Acad Radiol 13(3):379–390, 2006CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Chorney ET, Lewis PJ: Integrating a radiology curriculum into clinical clerkships using case oriented radiology education. J Am Coll Radiol 8(1):58–64.e1-4, 2011CrossRefPubMed Chorney ET, Lewis PJ: Integrating a radiology curriculum into clinical clerkships using case oriented radiology education. J Am Coll Radiol 8(1):58–64.e1-4, 2011CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Dugas M, Trumm C, Stabler A, Pander E, Hundt W, Scheidler J, et al: Case-oriented computer-based-training in radiology: concept, implementation and evaluation. BMC Med Educ 1:5, 2001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dugas M, Trumm C, Stabler A, Pander E, Hundt W, Scheidler J, et al: Case-oriented computer-based-training in radiology: concept, implementation and evaluation. BMC Med Educ 1:5, 2001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference van der Gijp A, Ravesloot CJ, van der Schaaf MF, van der Schaaf IC, Huige JCBM, Vincken KL, et al: Volumetric and two-dimensional image interpretation sohw different cognitive processes in learners. Academic Radiol In press, 2015 van der Gijp A, Ravesloot CJ, van der Schaaf MF, van der Schaaf IC, Huige JCBM, Vincken KL, et al: Volumetric and two-dimensional image interpretation sohw different cognitive processes in learners. Academic Radiol In press, 2015
32.
go back to reference Wutoh R, Boren SA, Balas EA: eLearning: a review of Internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 24(1):20–30, 2004CrossRefPubMed Wutoh R, Boren SA, Balas EA: eLearning: a review of Internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 24(1):20–30, 2004CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D: A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. J Adv Nurs 71(2):255–270, 2015 McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D: A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. J Adv Nurs 71(2):255–270, 2015
Metadata
Title
The Importance of Human–Computer Interaction in Radiology E-learning
Authors
Annemarie M. den Harder
Marissa Frijlingh
Cécile J. Ravesloot
Anne E. Oosterbaan
Anouk van der Gijp
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9828-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2016 Go to the issue