Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2015

01-08-2015

Improving Radiology Report Quality by Rapidly Notifying Radiologist of Report Errors

Authors: Matthew J. Minn, Arash R. Zandieh, Ross W. Filice

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Radiology report errors occur for many reasons including the use of pre-filled report templates, wrong-word substitution, nonsensical phrases, and missing words. Reports may also contain clinical errors that are not specific to the speech recognition including wrong laterality and gender-specific discrepancies. Our goal was to create a custom algorithm to detect potential gender and laterality mismatch errors and to notify the interpreting radiologists for rapid correction. A JavaScript algorithm was devised to flag gender and laterality mismatch errors by searching the text of the report for keywords and comparing them to parameters within the study’s HL7 metadata (i.e., procedure type, patient sex). The error detection algorithm was retrospectively applied to 82,353 reports 4 months prior to its development and then prospectively to 309,304 reports 15 months after implementation. Flagged reports were reviewed individually by two radiologists for a true gender or laterality error and to determine if the errors were ultimately corrected. There was significant improvement in the number of flagged reports (pre, 198/82,353 [0.24 %]; post, 628/309,304 [0.20 %]; P = 0.04) and reports containing confirmed gender or laterality errors (pre, 116/82,353 [0.014 %]; post, 285/309,304 [0.09 %]; P < 0.0001) after implementing our error notification system. The number of flagged reports containing an error that were ultimately corrected improved dramatically after implementing the notification system (pre, 17/116 [15 %]; post, 239/285 [84 %]; P < 0.0001). We developed a successful automated tool for detecting and notifying radiologists of potential gender and laterality errors, allowing for rapid report correction and reducing the overall rate of report errors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luetmer MT, Hunt CH, McDonald RJ, Bartholmai BJ, Kallmes DF: Laterality errors in radiology reports generated with and without voice recognition software: frequency and clinical significance. J Am Coll Radiol 10(7):538–43, 2013PubMedCrossRef Luetmer MT, Hunt CH, McDonald RJ, Bartholmai BJ, Kallmes DF: Laterality errors in radiology reports generated with and without voice recognition software: frequency and clinical significance. J Am Coll Radiol 10(7):538–43, 2013PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pezzullo JA, Tung GA, Rogg JM, Davis LM, Brody JM, Mayo-Smith WW: Voice recognition dictation: radiologist as transcriptionist. J Digit Imaging 21(4):384–9, 2008PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pezzullo JA, Tung GA, Rogg JM, Davis LM, Brody JM, Mayo-Smith WW: Voice recognition dictation: radiologist as transcriptionist. J Digit Imaging 21(4):384–9, 2008PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kauppinen T, Koivikko MP, Ahovuo J: Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition: A Follow-up Study. J Digit Imaging 21(4):378–82, 2008PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kauppinen T, Koivikko MP, Ahovuo J: Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition: A Follow-up Study. J Digit Imaging 21(4):378–82, 2008PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chang CA, Strahan R, Jolley D: Non-clinical errors using voice recognition dictation software for radiology reports: a retrospective audit. J Digit Imaging 24(4):724–8, 2011PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Chang CA, Strahan R, Jolley D: Non-clinical errors using voice recognition dictation software for radiology reports: a retrospective audit. J Digit Imaging 24(4):724–8, 2011PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gale B, Safriel Y, Lukban A, Kalowitz J, Fleischer J, Gordon D: Radiology report production times, voice recognition vs. transcription. Radiol Manage 23(2):18–22, 2001PubMed Gale B, Safriel Y, Lukban A, Kalowitz J, Fleischer J, Gordon D: Radiology report production times, voice recognition vs. transcription. Radiol Manage 23(2):18–22, 2001PubMed
6.
go back to reference Sferrella SM: Success with voice recognition. Radiol Manage 25(3):42–49, 2003PubMed Sferrella SM: Success with voice recognition. Radiol Manage 25(3):42–49, 2003PubMed
7.
go back to reference Marquez LO, Stewart H: Improving medical imaging report turnaround times: the role of technology. Radiol Manage 27(2):26–31, 2005PubMed Marquez LO, Stewart H: Improving medical imaging report turnaround times: the role of technology. Radiol Manage 27(2):26–31, 2005PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rana DS, Hurst G, Shepstone L, Pilling J, Cockburn J, Crawford M: Voice recognition for radiology reporting: is it good enough? Clin Radiol 60(11):1205–12, 2005 Rana DS, Hurst G, Shepstone L, Pilling J, Cockburn J, Crawford M: Voice recognition for radiology reporting: is it good enough? Clin Radiol 60(11):1205–12, 2005
9.
go back to reference Basma S, Lord B, Jacks LM, Rizk M, Scaranelo AM: Error rates in breast imaging reports: comparison of automatic speech recognition and dictation transcription. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(4):923–7, 2011PubMedCrossRef Basma S, Lord B, Jacks LM, Rizk M, Scaranelo AM: Error rates in breast imaging reports: comparison of automatic speech recognition and dictation transcription. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(4):923–7, 2011PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference McGurk S, Brauer K, Macfarlane TV, Duncan KA: The effect of voice recognition software on comparative error rates in radiology reports. Br J Radiol 81(970):767–70, 2008PubMedCrossRef McGurk S, Brauer K, Macfarlane TV, Duncan KA: The effect of voice recognition software on comparative error rates in radiology reports. Br J Radiol 81(970):767–70, 2008PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Strahan RH, Schneider-Kolsky ME: Voice recognition versus transcriptionist: error rates and productivity in MRI reporting. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54(5):411–4, 2010PubMedCrossRef Strahan RH, Schneider-Kolsky ME: Voice recognition versus transcriptionist: error rates and productivity in MRI reporting. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54(5):411–4, 2010PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Quint LE, Quint DJ, Myles JD: Frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology. J Am Coll Radiol 5(12):1196–9, 2008PubMedCrossRef Quint LE, Quint DJ, Myles JD: Frequency and spectrum of errors in final radiology reports generated with automatic speech recognition technology. J Am Coll Radiol 5(12):1196–9, 2008PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sangwaiya MJ, Saini S, Blake MA, Dreyer KJ, Kalra MK: Errare humanum est: frequency of laterality errors in radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(5):W239–44, 2009PubMedCrossRef Sangwaiya MJ, Saini S, Blake MA, Dreyer KJ, Kalra MK: Errare humanum est: frequency of laterality errors in radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(5):W239–44, 2009PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hawkins CM, Hall S, Hardin J, Salisbury S, Towbin AJ: Prepopulated radiology report templates: a prospective analysis of error rate and turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 25(4):504–11, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hawkins CM, Hall S, Hardin J, Salisbury S, Towbin AJ: Prepopulated radiology report templates: a prospective analysis of error rate and turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 25(4):504–11, 2012PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hawkins CM, Hall S, Zhang B, Towbin AJ: Creation and implementation of department-wide structured reports: an analysis of the impact on error rate in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 27(5):581–7, 2014PubMedCrossRef Hawkins CM, Hall S, Zhang B, Towbin AJ: Creation and implementation of department-wide structured reports: an analysis of the impact on error rate in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 27(5):581–7, 2014PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF: Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized reporting. Radiology 267(1):240–50, 2013PubMedCrossRef Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF: Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized reporting. Radiology 267(1):240–50, 2013PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA: Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg 141(4):353–7, 2006PubMedCrossRef Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA: Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg 141(4):353–7, 2006PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Seiden SC, Barach P: Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: Are they preventable? Arch Surg 141(9):931–9, 2006PubMedCrossRef Seiden SC, Barach P: Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: Are they preventable? Arch Surg 141(9):931–9, 2006PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Landau E, Hirschorn D, Koutras I, Malek A, Demissie S. Preventing Errors in Laterality. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Oct 2. Landau E, Hirschorn D, Koutras I, Malek A, Demissie S. Preventing Errors in Laterality. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Oct 2.
20.
go back to reference Lumish HS, Sidhu MS, Kallianos K, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U, Ghoshhajra BB: Reporting scan tiem reduces cardiac MR examination duration. J Am Coll Radiol 11(4):425–8, 2014PubMedCrossRef Lumish HS, Sidhu MS, Kallianos K, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U, Ghoshhajra BB: Reporting scan tiem reduces cardiac MR examination duration. J Am Coll Radiol 11(4):425–8, 2014PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improving Radiology Report Quality by Rapidly Notifying Radiologist of Report Errors
Authors
Matthew J. Minn
Arash R. Zandieh
Ross W. Filice
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9781-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2015 Go to the issue