Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2015

01-06-2015

A Mathematical Simulation to Assess Variability in Lung Nodule Size Measurement Associated With Nodule-Slice Position

Authors: Krishna Juluru, Noor Al Khori, Sha He, Amy Kuceyeski, John Eng

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the variance and error in nodule diameter measurement associated with variations in nodule-slice position in cross-sectional imaging. A computer program utilizing a standard geometric model was used to simulate theoretical slices through a perfectly spherical nodule of known size, position, and density within a background of “lung” of known fixed density. Assuming a threshold density, partial volume effect of a voxel was simulated using published slice and pixel sensitivity profiles. At a given slice thickness and nodule size, 100 scans were simulated differing only in scan start position, then repeated for multiple node sizes at three simulated slice thicknesses. Diameter was measured using a standard, automated algorithm. The frequency of measured diameters was tabulated; average errors and standard deviations (SD) were calculated. For a representative 5-mm nodule, average measurement error ranged from +10 to −23 % and SD ranged from 0.07 to 0.99 mm at slice thicknesses of 0.75 to 5 mm, respectively. At fixed slice thickness, average error and SD decreased from peak values as nodule size increased. At fixed nodule size, SD increased as slice thickness increased. Average error exhibited dependence on both slice thickness and threshold. Variance and error in nodule diameter measurement associated with nodule-slice position exists due to geometrical limitations. This can lead to false interpretations of nodule growth or stability that could affect clinical management. The variance is most pronounced at higher slice thicknesses and for small nodule sizes. Measurement error is slice thickness and threshold dependent.
Literature
1.
go back to reference MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al: Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400, 2005CrossRefPubMed MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al: Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400, 2005CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247, 2009CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247, 2009CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Organization WH. WHO (World Health Organization, Genf): Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment: WHO, 1979 Organization WH. WHO (World Health Organization, Genf): Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment: WHO, 1979
4.
go back to reference Marten K, Engelke C: Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 17(4):888–901, 2007CrossRefPubMed Marten K, Engelke C: Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 17(4):888–901, 2007CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Buckler AJ, Mulshine JL, Gottlieb R, Zhao B, Mozley PD, Schwartz L: The use of volumetric CT as an imaging biomarker in lung cancer. Acad Radiol 17(1):100–106, 2010CrossRefPubMed Buckler AJ, Mulshine JL, Gottlieb R, Zhao B, Mozley PD, Schwartz L: The use of volumetric CT as an imaging biomarker in lung cancer. Acad Radiol 17(1):100–106, 2010CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gavrielides MA, Kinnard LM, Myers KJ, et al: A resource for the assessment of lung nodule size estimation methods: database of thoracic CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom. Opt Express 18(14):15244–15255, 2010CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gavrielides MA, Kinnard LM, Myers KJ, et al: A resource for the assessment of lung nodule size estimation methods: database of thoracic CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom. Opt Express 18(14):15244–15255, 2010CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference McNitt‐Gray M: MO‐A‐ValB‐01: Tradeoffs in Image Quality and Radiation Dose for CT. Med Phys 33:2154, 2006CrossRef McNitt‐Gray M: MO‐A‐ValB‐01: Tradeoffs in Image Quality and Radiation Dose for CT. Med Phys 33:2154, 2006CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Xu DM, van Klaveren RJ, de Bock GH, et al: Role of baseline nodule density and changes in density and nodule features in the discrimination between benign and malignant solid indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol 70(3):492–498, 2009CrossRefPubMed Xu DM, van Klaveren RJ, de Bock GH, et al: Role of baseline nodule density and changes in density and nodule features in the discrimination between benign and malignant solid indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol 70(3):492–498, 2009CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sverzellati N, Randi G, Spagnolo P, et al: Increased mean lung density: another independent predictor of lung cancer? Eur J Radiol 82(8):1325–1331, 2013CrossRefPubMed Sverzellati N, Randi G, Spagnolo P, et al: Increased mean lung density: another independent predictor of lung cancer? Eur J Radiol 82(8):1325–1331, 2013CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mozley PD, Bendtsen C, Zhao B, et al: Measurement of tumor volumes improves RECIST-based response assessments in advanced lung cancer. Transl Oncol 5(1):19–25, 2012CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Mozley PD, Bendtsen C, Zhao B, et al: Measurement of tumor volumes improves RECIST-based response assessments in advanced lung cancer. Transl Oncol 5(1):19–25, 2012CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Goodman LR, Gulsun M, Washington L, Nagy PG, Piacsek KL: Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):989–994, 2006CrossRefPubMed Goodman LR, Gulsun M, Washington L, Nagy PG, Piacsek KL: Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):989–994, 2006CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al: Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14(1):86–92, 2004CrossRefPubMed Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al: Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14(1):86–92, 2004CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H, et al: Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 54(2):177–184, 2006CrossRefPubMed Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H, et al: Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 54(2):177–184, 2006CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Xu DM, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Oudkerk M, et al: Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up. Radiology 250(1):264–272, 2009CrossRefPubMed Xu DM, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Oudkerk M, et al: Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up. Radiology 250(1):264–272, 2009CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Mathematical Simulation to Assess Variability in Lung Nodule Size Measurement Associated With Nodule-Slice Position
Authors
Krishna Juluru
Noor Al Khori
Sha He
Amy Kuceyeski
John Eng
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9753-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2015 Go to the issue