Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2014

01-08-2014

A Content-Boosted Collaborative Filtering Algorithm for Personalized Training in Interpretation of Radiological Imaging

Authors: Hongli Lin, Xuedong Yang, Weisheng Wang

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Devising a method that can select cases based on the performance levels of trainees and the characteristics of cases is essential for developing a personalized training program in radiology education. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid prediction algorithm called content-boosted collaborative filtering (CBCF) to predict the difficulty level of each case for each trainee. The CBCF utilizes a content-based filtering (CBF) method to enhance existing trainee-case ratings data and then provides final predictions through a collaborative filtering (CF) algorithm. The CBCF algorithm incorporates the advantages of both CBF and CF, while not inheriting the disadvantages of either. The CBCF method is compared with the pure CBF and pure CF approaches using three datasets. The experimental data are then evaluated in terms of the MAE metric. Our experimental results show that the CBCF outperforms the pure CBF and CF methods by 13.33 and 12.17 %, respectively, in terms of prediction precision. This also suggests that the CBCF can be used in the development of personalized training systems in radiology education.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, et al: Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 331(22):1493–1499, 1994CrossRefPubMed Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, et al: Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 331(22):1493–1499, 1994CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Watadani T, Sakai F, Johkoh T, et al: Interobserver Variability in the CT Assessment of Honeycombing in the Lungs. Radiology 266:936–944, 2013CrossRefPubMed Watadani T, Sakai F, Johkoh T, et al: Interobserver Variability in the CT Assessment of Honeycombing in the Lungs. Radiology 266:936–944, 2013CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Grady D: Variability and Accuracy in Mammographic Interpretation Using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 90(23):1801–1809, 1998CrossRef Kerlikowske K, Grady D: Variability and Accuracy in Mammographic Interpretation Using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 90(23):1801–1809, 1998CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, et al: Potential of Computer-aided Diagnosis to Reduce Variability in Radiologists’ Interpretations of Mammograms Depicting Microcalcifications. Radiology 220:787–794, 2001CrossRefPubMed Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, et al: Potential of Computer-aided Diagnosis to Reduce Variability in Radiologists’ Interpretations of Mammograms Depicting Microcalcifications. Radiology 220:787–794, 2001CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Taylor PM: A Review of Research Into the Development of Radiologic Expertise: Implications for Computer-Based Training. Acad Radiol 14(10):1252–1263, 2007CrossRefPubMed Taylor PM: A Review of Research Into the Development of Radiologic Expertise: Implications for Computer-Based Training. Acad Radiol 14(10):1252–1263, 2007CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Linver MN, Paster SB, Rosenberg RD, et al: Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases. Radiology 184:39–43, 1992CrossRefPubMed Linver MN, Paster SB, Rosenberg RD, et al: Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases. Radiology 184:39–43, 1992CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Leung JWT, Margolin FR, Dee KE, et al: Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists. AJR. Am J Roentgenol 188:236–241, 2007CrossRef Leung JWT, Margolin FR, Dee KE, et al: Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists. AJR. Am J Roentgenol 188:236–241, 2007CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sun S, Taylor P, Wilkinson L, and Khoo L: An ontology to support adaptive training for breast radiologists. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2008, pp. 257–264 Sun S, Taylor P, Wilkinson L, and Khoo L: An ontology to support adaptive training for breast radiologists. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2008, pp. 257–264
9.
go back to reference Mazurowski MA, Baker JA, Barnhart HX, Tourassi GD: Individualized computer-aided education in mammography based on user modeling: Concept and preliminary experiments. Med Phys 37(1152):1152–1160, 2010PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Mazurowski MA, Baker JA, Barnhart HX, Tourassi GD: Individualized computer-aided education in mammography based on user modeling: Concept and preliminary experiments. Med Phys 37(1152):1152–1160, 2010PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference MA Mazurowski, GD Tourassi: Exploring the potential of collaborative filtering for user-adaptive mammography education. Biomedical Sciences and Engineering Conference (BSEC), 2011 MA Mazurowski, GD Tourassi: Exploring the potential of collaborative filtering for user-adaptive mammography education. Biomedical Sciences and Engineering Conference (BSEC), 2011
11.
go back to reference Allen, RB: User models: theory, method and Practice. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 1990 Allen, RB: User models: theory, method and Practice. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 1990
12.
go back to reference Herlocker, JL, Konstan, JA, Riedl, J: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2000 Herlocker, JL, Konstan, JA, Riedl, J: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2000
13.
go back to reference Herlocker J, Konstan JA, Terveen L, Riedl J: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22 (1), 2004 Herlocker J, Konstan JA, Terveen L, Riedl J: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22 (1), 2004
14.
go back to reference Balabanovic M, Sholam Y: Fab:Combining content-based and collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72, 1997CrossRef Balabanovic M, Sholam Y: Fab:Combining content-based and collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72, 1997CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Huang Z, Chen H, Zeng D: Applying associative retrieval techniques to alleviate the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):116–142, 2001CrossRef Huang Z, Chen H, Zeng D: Applying associative retrieval techniques to alleviate the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):116–142, 2001CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Linden G, Smith B, York J: Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing 7(1):76–80, 2003CrossRef Linden G, Smith B, York J: Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing 7(1):76–80, 2003CrossRef
17.
go back to reference MelvilleP, Mooney RJ and Nagarajan R: Content boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommendations, in Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 02), Edmonton, Canada, 2002, pp. 187–192 MelvilleP, Mooney RJ and Nagarajan R: Content boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommendations, in Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 02), Edmonton, Canada, 2002, pp. 187–192
18.
go back to reference Su X, Khoshgoftaar TM, Zhu X and Greiner R: Imputation-boosted collaborative filtering using machine learning classifiers, in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 08),Cear’a Fortaleza, Brazil, March 2008, pp. 949–950 Su X, Khoshgoftaar TM, Zhu X and Greiner R: Imputation-boosted collaborative filtering using machine learning classifiers, in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 08),Cear’a Fortaleza, Brazil, March 2008, pp. 949–950
19.
go back to reference Pennock, D. M, Horvitz E, Lawrence S and C. L. Giles, Collaborative filtering by personality diagnosis: a hybrid memory- and model-based approach, in Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 00), 2000, pp. 473–480 Pennock, D. M, Horvitz E, Lawrence S and C. L. Giles, Collaborative filtering by personality diagnosis: a hybrid memory- and model-based approach, in Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 00), 2000, pp. 473–480
20.
go back to reference Claypool M, et al: Combining content-based and collaborative filters in an online newspaper. Proceedings of ACM SIGIR workshop on recommender systems. Vol. 60, 1999 Claypool M, et al: Combining content-based and collaborative filters in an online newspaper. Proceedings of ACM SIGIR workshop on recommender systems. Vol. 60, 1999
21.
go back to reference Armato SG, McLennan G, Bidaut L, McNitt-Gray MF, Meyer CR, Reeves AP, Zhao B, et al: The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. Medical physics 38:915, 2011PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Armato SG, McLennan G, Bidaut L, McNitt-Gray MF, Meyer CR, Reeves AP, Zhao B, et al: The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. Medical physics 38:915, 2011PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hofmann, T: Collaborative filtering via gaussian probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2003 Hofmann, T: Collaborative filtering via gaussian probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2003
Metadata
Title
A Content-Boosted Collaborative Filtering Algorithm for Personalized Training in Interpretation of Radiological Imaging
Authors
Hongli Lin
Xuedong Yang
Weisheng Wang
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9678-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2014 Go to the issue