Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2012

01-10-2012

Computerized Analysis of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns on a Large Clinical Dataset of Full-Field Digital Mammograms: Robustness Study with Two High-Risk Datasets

Authors: Hui Li, Maryellen L. Giger, Li Lan, Jeremy Bancroft Brown, Aoife MacMahon, Mary Mussman, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Charlene Sennett

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the robustness of our prior computerized texture analysis method for breast cancer risk assessment, which was developed initially on a limited dataset of screen-film mammograms. This current study investigated the robustness by (1) evaluating on a large clinical dataset, (2) using full-field digital mammograms (FFDM) as opposed to screen-film mammography, and (3) incorporating analyses over two types of high-risk patient sets, as well as patients at low risk for breast cancer. The evaluation included the analyses on the parenchymal patterns of women at high risk of developing of breast cancer, including both BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and unilateral cancer patients, and of women at low risk of developing breast cancer. A total of 456 cases, including 53 women with BRCA1/2 gene mutations, 75 women with unilateral cancer, and 328 low-risk women, were retrospectively collected under an institutional review board approved protocol. Regions-of-interest (ROIs), were manually selected from the central breast region immediately behind the nipple. These ROIs were subsequently used in computerized feature extraction to characterize the mammographic parenchymal patterns in the images. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the performance of the computerized texture features in the task of distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk subjects. In a round robin evaluation on the FFDM dataset with Bayesian artificial neural network analysis, AUC values of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [0.75, 0.88]) and 0.73 (95% confidence interval [0.67, 0.78]) were obtained between BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and low-risk women, and between unilateral cancer and low-risk women, respectively. These results from computerized texture analysis on digital mammograms demonstrated that high-risk and low-risk women have different mammographic parenchymal patterns. On this large clinical dataset, we validated our methods for quantitative analyses of mammographic patterns on FFDM, statistically demonstrating again that women at high risk tend to have dense breasts with coarse and low-contrast texture patterns.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A: Cancer Statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 61:212–236, 2011PubMedCrossRef Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A: Cancer Statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 61:212–236, 2011PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference American College of Radiology: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, Va, 2003 American College of Radiology: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, Va, 2003
3.
go back to reference Wolfe JN: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1139, 1976 Wolfe JN: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1139, 1976
4.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, Greenberg, et al: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Curr Oncol Rep 3:314–321, 2001PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, Greenberg, et al: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Curr Oncol Rep 3:314–321, 2001PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brisson J, Diorio C, Mâsse B: Wolfe’s parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:728–732, 2003PubMed Brisson J, Diorio C, Mâsse B: Wolfe’s parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:728–732, 2003PubMed
6.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ, et al: Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Breast Dis 10:113–126, 1998PubMed Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ, et al: Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Breast Dis 10:113–126, 1998PubMed
7.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, et al: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Cancer Prev 3:314–321, 2001 Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, et al: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Cancer Prev 3:314–321, 2001
8.
go back to reference Atkinson C, Warren R, Bingham SA, et al: Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:863–866, 1999PubMed Atkinson C, Warren R, Bingham SA, et al: Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:863–866, 1999PubMed
9.
go back to reference Saftlas AF, Hoover RN, Brinton LA, et al: Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer 67:2833–2838, 1991PubMedCrossRef Saftlas AF, Hoover RN, Brinton LA, et al: Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer 67:2833–2838, 1991PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe JN, et al: Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: Effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1622–1629, 1995PubMedCrossRef Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe JN, et al: Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: Effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1622–1629, 1995PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Byng J, Jong R: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675, 1995PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Byng J, Jong R: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675, 1995PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236, 2007PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236, 2007PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Lockwood GA, et al: Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer 80:66–74, 1997PubMedCrossRef Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Lockwood GA, et al: Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer 80:66–74, 1997PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Manduca A, Carston MJ, Heine JJ, et al: Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18:837–845, 2009PubMedCrossRef Manduca A, Carston MJ, Heine JJ, et al: Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18:837–845, 2009PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wei J, Chan HP, Wu YT, et al: Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case–control study. Radiology 260:42–49, 2011PubMedCrossRef Wei J, Chan HP, Wu YT, et al: Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case–control study. Radiology 260:42–49, 2011PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Huo Z, Giger ML, Wolverton DE, et al: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Med Phys 27:4–12, 2000PubMedCrossRef Huo Z, Giger ML, Wolverton DE, et al: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Med Phys 27:4–12, 2000PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Huo Z, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al: Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 225:519–526, 2002PubMedCrossRef Huo Z, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al: Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 225:519–526, 2002PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 12:863–873, 2005PubMedCrossRef Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 12:863–873, 2005PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al: Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Acad Radiol 14:513–521, 2007PubMedCrossRef Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al: Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Acad Radiol 14:513–521, 2007PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al: Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment. J Digit Imaging 21:145–152, 2008PubMedCrossRef Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, et al: Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment. J Digit Imaging 21:145–152, 2008PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Metz CE: Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24:234–245, 1989PubMedCrossRef Metz CE: Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24:234–245, 1989PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886, 1989PubMedCrossRef Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886, 1989PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Li H, Giger ML, Huo Z, et al: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Med Phys 31:549–555, 2004PubMedCrossRef Li H, Giger ML, Huo Z, et al: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Med Phys 31:549–555, 2004PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM: Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 58:562–571, 2007PubMedCrossRef Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM: Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 58:562–571, 2007PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Huberty CJ: Applied Discriminant Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1994 Huberty CJ: Applied Discriminant Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1994
27.
go back to reference Lachenbruch PL: Discriminant Analysis. Hafer, London, England, 1975 Lachenbruch PL: Discriminant Analysis. Hafer, London, England, 1975
28.
go back to reference Kupinski MA, Edwards DC, Giger ML, et al: Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:886–899, 2001PubMedCrossRef Kupinski MA, Edwards DC, Giger ML, et al: Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:886–899, 2001PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Holm S: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70, 1979 Holm S: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70, 1979
31.
go back to reference Johnson RA, Wichern DW: Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992 Johnson RA, Wichern DW: Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992
Metadata
Title
Computerized Analysis of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns on a Large Clinical Dataset of Full-Field Digital Mammograms: Robustness Study with Two High-Risk Datasets
Authors
Hui Li
Maryellen L. Giger
Li Lan
Jeremy Bancroft Brown
Aoife MacMahon
Mary Mussman
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
Charlene Sennett
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9452-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2012 Go to the issue