Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2012

01-06-2012

DICOM for Implantations—Overview and Application

Authors: Thomas Treichel, Michael Gessat, Torsten Prietzel, Oliver Burgert

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Surgeons have to deal with many devices from different vendors within the operating room during surgery. Independent communication standards are necessary for the system integration of these devices. For implantations, three new extensions of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard make use of a common communication standard that may optimise one of the surgeon's presently very time-consuming daily tasks. The paper provides a brief description of these DICOM Supplements and gives recommendations to their application in practice based on workflows that are proposed to be covered by the new standard extension. Two of the workflows are described in detail and separated into phases that are supported by the new data structures. Examples for the application of the standard within these phases give an impression of the potential usage. Even if the presented workflows are from different domains, we identified a generic core that may benefit from the surgical DICOM Supplements. In some steps of the workflows, the surgical DICOM Supplements are able to replace or optimise conventional methods. Standardisation can only be a means for integration and interoperability. Thus, it can be used as the basis for new applications and system architectures. The influence on current applications and communication processes is limited. Additionally, the supplements provide the basis for further applications, such as the support of surgical navigation systems. Given the support of all involved stakeholders, it is possible to provide a benefit for surgeons and patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meyer M, Levine W, Egan M, Cohen B, Spitz G, Garcia P, Chueh H, Sandberg W: A computerized perioperative data integration and display system. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2(3):191–202, 2007CrossRef Meyer M, Levine W, Egan M, Cohen B, Spitz G, Garcia P, Chueh H, Sandberg W: A computerized perioperative data integration and display system. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2(3):191–202, 2007CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Endress A, Brucker S, Wallwiener D, Aydeniz B, Kurek R, Zubke W: Systems integration in the operating room: the challenge of the decade. Gynecol Surg 3(1):6–11, 2006CrossRef Endress A, Brucker S, Wallwiener D, Aydeniz B, Kurek R, Zubke W: Systems integration in the operating room: the challenge of the decade. Gynecol Surg 3(1):6–11, 2006CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ibach B, Zimolong A, Portheine F, Niethard FU, Radermacher K: Integrated medical workstations for Computer Integrated Smart Surgery (CISS) - state of the art, bottlenecks and approaches. Int J CARS 1(S1):437–454, 2006CrossRef Ibach B, Zimolong A, Portheine F, Niethard FU, Radermacher K: Integrated medical workstations for Computer Integrated Smart Surgery (CISS) - state of the art, bottlenecks and approaches. Int J CARS 1(S1):437–454, 2006CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Merx H, Dreinhofer K, Schrader P, Sturmer T, Puhl W, Gunther K, Brenner H: International variation in hip replacement rates. Ann Rheum Dis 62(3):222–226, 2003PubMedCrossRef Merx H, Dreinhofer K, Schrader P, Sturmer T, Puhl W, Gunther K, Brenner H: International variation in hip replacement rates. Ann Rheum Dis 62(3):222–226, 2003PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80-B(3):382–390, 1998 May Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80-B(3):382–390, 1998 May
7.
go back to reference Müller ME: Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:12–21, 1992PubMed Müller ME: Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:12–21, 1992PubMed
8.
go back to reference Descamps S, Livesey C, Learmonth ID. Determination of digitised radiograph magnification factors for pre-operative templating in hip prosthesis surgery [Internet]. Skeletal Radiology 2009; [cited 2009 Nov 13] Available from: doi:10.1007/s00256-009-0732-8 Descamps S, Livesey C, Learmonth ID. Determination of digitised radiograph magnification factors for pre-operative templating in hip prosthesis surgery [Internet]. Skeletal Radiology 2009; [cited 2009 Nov 13] Available from: doi:10.​1007/​s00256-009-0732-8
9.
go back to reference Nolte L, Ganz R. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS). Hogrefe & Huber; 1999 Nolte L, Ganz R. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS). Hogrefe & Huber; 1999
10.
go back to reference Whiddon DR, Bono JV: Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 57:273–279, 2008PubMed Whiddon DR, Bono JV: Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 57:273–279, 2008PubMed
11.
go back to reference Wenzel A, Gröndahl HG: Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J 45(1):27–34, 1995PubMed Wenzel A, Gröndahl HG: Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J 45(1):27–34, 1995PubMed
12.
go back to reference Viceconti M, Lattanzi R, Antonietti B, Paderni S, Olmi R, Sudanese A, Toni A: CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Medical Engineering & Physics 25(5):371–377, 2003CrossRef Viceconti M, Lattanzi R, Antonietti B, Paderni S, Olmi R, Sudanese A, Toni A: CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Medical Engineering & Physics 25(5):371–377, 2003CrossRef
13.
go back to reference The B, Verdonschot N, van Horn JR, van Ooijen PM, Diercks RL: Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: a randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 22(6):866–870, 2007CrossRef The B, Verdonschot N, van Horn JR, van Ooijen PM, Diercks RL: Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: a randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 22(6):866–870, 2007CrossRef
14.
go back to reference The B, Diercks RL, Stewart RE, van Ooijen PMA, van Horn JR: Digital correction of magnification in pelvic x rays for preoperative planning of hip joint replacements: Theoretical development and clinical results of a new protocol. Med. Phys 32(8):2580–2589, 2005PubMedCrossRef The B, Diercks RL, Stewart RE, van Ooijen PMA, van Horn JR: Digital correction of magnification in pelvic x rays for preoperative planning of hip joint replacements: Theoretical development and clinical results of a new protocol. Med. Phys 32(8):2580–2589, 2005PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association, editor. DICOM Standard PS 3.3: Information Object Definitions [Internet]. Rosslyn, Virginia USA: 2008.Available from: http://medical.nema.org/ National Electrical Manufacturers Association, editor. DICOM Standard PS 3.3: Information Object Definitions [Internet]. Rosslyn, Virginia USA: 2008.Available from: http://​medical.​nema.​org/​
17.
go back to reference Clunie DA. DICOM Structured Reporting. PixelMed; 2000 Clunie DA. DICOM Structured Reporting. PixelMed; 2000
Metadata
Title
DICOM for Implantations—Overview and Application
Authors
Thomas Treichel
Michael Gessat
Torsten Prietzel
Oliver Burgert
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9416-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2012 Go to the issue