Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2011

01-06-2011

Textural Kinetics: A Novel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Feature for Breast Lesion Classification

Authors: Shannon C. Agner, Salil Soman, Edward Libfeld, Margie McDonald, Kathleen Thomas, Sarah Englander, Mark A. Rosen, Deanna Chin, John Nosher, Anant Madabhushi

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast has emerged as an adjunct imaging tool to conventional X-ray mammography due to its high detection sensitivity. Despite the increasing use of breast DCE-MRI, specificity in distinguishing malignant from benign breast lesions is low, and interobserver variability in lesion classification is high. The novel contribution of this paper is in the definition of a new DCE-MRI descriptor that we call textural kinetics, which attempts to capture spatiotemporal changes in breast lesion texture in order to distinguish malignant from benign lesions. We qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrated on 41 breast DCE-MRI studies that textural kinetic features outperform signal intensity kinetics and lesion morphology features in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. A probabilistic boosting tree (PBT) classifier in conjunction with textural kinetic descriptors yielded an accuracy of 90%, sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 82%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92. Graph embedding, used for qualitative visualization of a low-dimensional representation of the data, showed the best separation between benign and malignant lesions when using textural kinetic features. The PBT classifier results and trends were also corroborated via a support vector machine classifier which showed that textural kinetic features outperformed the morphological, static texture, and signal intensity kinetics descriptors. When textural kinetic attributes were combined with morphologic descriptors, the resulting PBT classifier yielded 89% accuracy, 99% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and an AUC of 0.91.
Footnotes
1
Protected by PCT International Application No. PCT/US2009/034505.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, Smith RA, Warner E, Yaffe M, Andrews KS, Russell CA: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89, 2007PubMedCrossRef Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S, Smith RA, Warner E, Yaffe M, Andrews KS, Russell CA: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75–89, 2007PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Hienig A, Kuchler C: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24:94–108, 1997PubMedCrossRef Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Hienig A, Kuchler C: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24:94–108, 1997PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PA: Benign breast lesions: ultrasound detection and diagnosis. Radiology 151:467–470, 1984PubMed Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PA: Benign breast lesions: ultrasound detection and diagnosis. Radiology 151:467–470, 1984PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieske J, Schild HH: Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions. Radiology 211:101–110, 1999PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieske J, Schild HH: Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions. Radiology 211:101–110, 1999PubMed
5.
go back to reference Piccoli CW: Contrast-enhanced breast MRI: factors affecting sensitivity and specificity. Eur Radiol 7(Suppl. 5):S281–S288, 1997CrossRef Piccoli CW: Contrast-enhanced breast MRI: factors affecting sensitivity and specificity. Eur Radiol 7(Suppl. 5):S281–S288, 1997CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nie K, Chen J-H, Yu HJ, Chu Y, Nalcioglu O, Su M-Y: Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol 15:1513–1525, 2008PubMedCrossRef Nie K, Chen J-H, Yu HJ, Chu Y, Nalcioglu O, Su M-Y: Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol 15:1513–1525, 2008PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ikeda DM, Hylton N, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl C, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD: Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:889–895, 2001PubMedCrossRef Ikeda DM, Hylton N, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl C, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD: Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:889–895, 2001PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (ACR): Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas (BIRADS Atlas). American College of Radiology, Reston, 2003 American College of Radiology (ACR): Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas (BIRADS Atlas). American College of Radiology, Reston, 2003
9.
go back to reference Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, Barclay J, Schwerin E, Sickles EA, Hylton NM: Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesion: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(1):35–43, 2000PubMed Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, Barclay J, Schwerin E, Sickles EA, Hylton NM: Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesion: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(1):35–43, 2000PubMed
10.
go back to reference Schnall MD, Blume J, Bleumke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl C, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Thickman D, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Lehman C, Gastonis CA: Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238(1):42–53, 2006PubMedCrossRef Schnall MD, Blume J, Bleumke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl C, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Thickman D, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Lehman C, Gastonis CA: Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238(1):42–53, 2006PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Li K-L, Henry R, Wilmes LJ, Gibbs J, Zhu X, Lu Y, Hylton NM: Kinetic assessment of breast tumors using high spatial resolution signal enhancement ratio (SER) imaging. Magn Reson Med 58(3):572–581, 2007PubMedCrossRef Li K-L, Henry R, Wilmes LJ, Gibbs J, Zhu X, Lu Y, Hylton NM: Kinetic assessment of breast tumors using high spatial resolution signal enhancement ratio (SER) imaging. Magn Reson Med 58(3):572–581, 2007PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM: Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesion on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33(8):2878–2887, 2006PubMedCrossRef Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM: Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesion on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 33(8):2878–2887, 2006PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stoutjesdijk MJ, Veltman J, Huisman H, Karssemeijer N, Barentsz JO, Blickman JG, Boetes C: Automated analysis of contrast enhancement in breast MRI lesions using mean shift clustering for ROI selection. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(3):606–614, 2007PubMedCrossRef Stoutjesdijk MJ, Veltman J, Huisman H, Karssemeijer N, Barentsz JO, Blickman JG, Boetes C: Automated analysis of contrast enhancement in breast MRI lesions using mean shift clustering for ROI selection. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(3):606–614, 2007PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK: Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters. Acad Radiol 11:1344–1354, 2004PubMedCrossRef Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK: Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters. Acad Radiol 11:1344–1354, 2004PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Twellmann T, Meyer-Baese A, Lange O, Foo S, Nattkemper TW: Model-free visualization of suspicious lesions in breast MRI based on supervised and unsupervised learning. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21:129–140, 2008PubMedCrossRef Twellmann T, Meyer-Baese A, Lange O, Foo S, Nattkemper TW: Model-free visualization of suspicious lesions in breast MRI based on supervised and unsupervised learning. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21:129–140, 2008PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zheng Y, Englander S, Baloch S, Zacharaki EI, Fan Y, Schnall MD, Shen D: STEP: spatiotemporal enhancement pattern for MR-based breast tumor diagnosis. Med Phys 37(7):3192–3204, 2009CrossRef Zheng Y, Englander S, Baloch S, Zacharaki EI, Fan Y, Schnall MD, Shen D: STEP: spatiotemporal enhancement pattern for MR-based breast tumor diagnosis. Med Phys 37(7):3192–3204, 2009CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Woods BJ, Clymer BD, Kurc T, Heverhagen JT, Stevens R, Orsdemir A, Bulan O, Knopp MV: Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:495–501, 2007PubMedCrossRef Woods BJ, Clymer BD, Kurc T, Heverhagen JT, Stevens R, Orsdemir A, Bulan O, Knopp MV: Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:495–501, 2007PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference McLaren CE, Chen W-P, Nie K, Su M-Y: Prediction of malignant breast lesions from mri features: a comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression techniques. Acad Radiol 16:842–851, 2009PubMedCrossRef McLaren CE, Chen W-P, Nie K, Su M-Y: Prediction of malignant breast lesions from mri features: a comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression techniques. Acad Radiol 16:842–851, 2009PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25(1):89–95, 2007PubMedCrossRef Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM: Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25(1):89–95, 2007PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Levman J, Leung T, Causer P, Plewes D, Martel AL: Classification of dynamic contast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector mechines. IEEE Transact Med Imaging 27:688–696, 2008CrossRef Levman J, Leung T, Causer P, Plewes D, Martel AL: Classification of dynamic contast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector mechines. IEEE Transact Med Imaging 27:688–696, 2008CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Penn A, Thompson S, Brem R, Lehman C, Weatherall P, Schnall M, Newstead G, Conant E, Ascher S, Morris E, Pisano E: Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Acad Radiol 13:1344–1354, 2006PubMedCrossRef Penn A, Thompson S, Brem R, Lehman C, Weatherall P, Schnall M, Newstead G, Conant E, Ascher S, Morris E, Pisano E: Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Acad Radiol 13:1344–1354, 2006PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gibbs P, Turnbull LW: Texture analysis of contast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magn Reson Med 50:92–98, 2003PubMedCrossRef Gibbs P, Turnbull LW: Texture analysis of contast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magn Reson Med 50:92–98, 2003PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstein D, Fields S, Strano S: Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 3(7):780–782, 1997PubMedCrossRef Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstein D, Fields S, Strano S: Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 3(7):780–782, 1997PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weinstein D, Strano S, Cohen P, Fields S, Gomori JM, Degani H: Breast fibroadenoma: mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced MR imaging—pilot study. Radiology 210(1):233–240, 1999PubMed Weinstein D, Strano S, Cohen P, Fields S, Gomori JM, Degani H: Breast fibroadenoma: mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced MR imaging—pilot study. Radiology 210(1):233–240, 1999PubMed
26.
go back to reference Hauth EAM, Jaeger H, Maderwald S, Muhler A, Kimmig R, Forsting M: Quantitative 2- and 3-dimensional analysis of pharmacokinetic model-derived variables for breast lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Eur J Radiol 66(6):300–308, 2008PubMedCrossRef Hauth EAM, Jaeger H, Maderwald S, Muhler A, Kimmig R, Forsting M: Quantitative 2- and 3-dimensional analysis of pharmacokinetic model-derived variables for breast lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Eur J Radiol 66(6):300–308, 2008PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Tofts PS, Berowitz B, Schnall MD: Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 33:564–568, 1995PubMedCrossRef Tofts PS, Berowitz B, Schnall MD: Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 33:564–568, 1995PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Martel AL: A fast method of generating pharmacokinetic maps from dynamic contrast-enhanced images of the breast. Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9(Pt 2):101–108, 2006 Martel AL: A fast method of generating pharmacokinetic maps from dynamic contrast-enhanced images of the breast. Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9(Pt 2):101–108, 2006
29.
go back to reference Vignati A, Giannini V, Bert A, Deluca M, Morra L, Persano D, Martincich L, Regge D: A fully automatic lesion detection method for DCE-MRI fat-suppressed breast images. Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, 2009 Vignati A, Giannini V, Bert A, Deluca M, Morra L, Persano D, Martincich L, Regge D: A fully automatic lesion detection method for DCE-MRI fat-suppressed breast images. Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, 2009
30.
go back to reference Coto E, Grimm S, Bruckner S, Groller ME, Kanitsar A, Rodriguez O. MammoExplorer: an advanced CAD application for breast DCE-MRI. Proceedings of Vision, Modeling and Visualization, 2005 Coto E, Grimm S, Bruckner S, Groller ME, Kanitsar A, Rodriguez O. MammoExplorer: an advanced CAD application for breast DCE-MRI. Proceedings of Vision, Modeling and Visualization, 2005
31.
go back to reference Veltman J, Stoutjesdijk M, Mann R, Huisman HJ, Barentsz JO, Blickman JG, Boetes C: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: the value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from fast dynamic imaging during initial enhancement in classifying lesions. Eur Radiol 18(6):1123–1133, 2008PubMedCrossRef Veltman J, Stoutjesdijk M, Mann R, Huisman HJ, Barentsz JO, Blickman JG, Boetes C: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: the value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from fast dynamic imaging during initial enhancement in classifying lesions. Eur Radiol 18(6):1123–1133, 2008PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Madabhushi A, Udupa JK, Souza A: Generalized scale: theory, algorithms, and application to image inhomogeneity. Comput Vis Image Underst 101(2):100–121, 2006CrossRef Madabhushi A, Udupa JK, Souza A: Generalized scale: theory, algorithms, and application to image inhomogeneity. Comput Vis Image Underst 101(2):100–121, 2006CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Madabhushi A, Feldman M, Metaxas DN, Tomaszewski J, Chute D: Automated detection of prostate adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI. IEEE Transact Med Imaging 24(12):1611–1625, 2005CrossRef Madabhushi A, Feldman M, Metaxas DN, Tomaszewski J, Chute D: Automated detection of prostate adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI. IEEE Transact Med Imaging 24(12):1611–1625, 2005CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Kruizinga P, Petkov N: Nonlinear operator for oriented texture. IEEE Transact Image Process 8(10):1395–1407, 1999CrossRef Kruizinga P, Petkov N: Nonlinear operator for oriented texture. IEEE Transact Image Process 8(10):1395–1407, 1999CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transact Syst Man Cybernet 3(6):610–621, 1973CrossRef Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transact Syst Man Cybernet 3(6):610–621, 1973CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Tiwari P, Rosen M, Madabhushi A: Dimensionality reduction scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Med Phys 36(9):3927–3939, 2009PubMedCrossRef Tiwari P, Rosen M, Madabhushi A: Dimensionality reduction scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Med Phys 36(9):3927–3939, 2009PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Shi J, Malik J: Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transact Pattern Anal Mach Intel 22(8):888–905, 2000CrossRef Shi J, Malik J: Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transact Pattern Anal Mach Intel 22(8):888–905, 2000CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Rorden C, Brett M: Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 12(4):191–200, 2000PubMed Rorden C, Brett M: Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 12(4):191–200, 2000PubMed
39.
go back to reference Gabor D: Theory of communication. J Inst Elect Eng 93:429–457, 1946 Gabor D: Theory of communication. J Inst Elect Eng 93:429–457, 1946
40.
go back to reference Grigorescu S, Petkov N, Kruizinga P: Comparison of texture features based on gabor filters. IEEE Transact Image Process 11:1160–1167, 2002CrossRef Grigorescu S, Petkov N, Kruizinga P: Comparison of texture features based on gabor filters. IEEE Transact Image Process 11:1160–1167, 2002CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Jain AK, Farrokhnia F: Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp 14–19, 1990 Jain AK, Farrokhnia F: Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp 14–19, 1990
42.
go back to reference Street WN, Wolberg WH, Mangasarian OL: Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis. IS&T/SPIE 1999 International Symposium on Electrical Imaging: Science and Technology, Vol. 1905, pp 861–70, 1993 Street WN, Wolberg WH, Mangasarian OL: Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis. IS&T/SPIE 1999 International Symposium on Electrical Imaging: Science and Technology, Vol. 1905, pp 861–70, 1993
43.
go back to reference Naik S, Doyle S, Feldman M, Tomaszewski J, Madabhushi A: Gland segmentation and computerized gleason grading of prostate histology by integrating low-, high-level and domain specific information. The Second International Workshop on Microscopic Image Analysis with Applications in Biology, 2007 Naik S, Doyle S, Feldman M, Tomaszewski J, Madabhushi A: Gland segmentation and computerized gleason grading of prostate histology by integrating low-, high-level and domain specific information. The Second International Workshop on Microscopic Image Analysis with Applications in Biology, 2007
44.
go back to reference Chapelle O, Haffner P, Vapnik V: Support vector machines for histogram-based image segmentation. IEEE Transact Neural Network 10:1055–1064, 1999CrossRef Chapelle O, Haffner P, Vapnik V: Support vector machines for histogram-based image segmentation. IEEE Transact Neural Network 10:1055–1064, 1999CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lee G, Rodriguez C, Madabhushi A: Investigating the efficacy on nonlinear dimensionality reduction schemes in classifying gene and protein expression studies. IEEE/ACM Transact Comput Biol Bioinform 5:368–384, 2008CrossRef Lee G, Rodriguez C, Madabhushi A: Investigating the efficacy on nonlinear dimensionality reduction schemes in classifying gene and protein expression studies. IEEE/ACM Transact Comput Biol Bioinform 5:368–384, 2008CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Cortes C, Vapnik V: Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297, 1995 Cortes C, Vapnik V: Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297, 1995
47.
go back to reference Freund Y, Schapire RE: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55:119–139, 1997CrossRef Freund Y, Schapire RE: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55:119–139, 1997CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Tu Z: Probabilistic boosting-tree: learning discriminative models for classification, recognition, and clustering. Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 2, pp 1589–1596, 2005 Tu Z: Probabilistic boosting-tree: learning discriminative models for classification, recognition, and clustering. Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 2, pp 1589–1596, 2005
49.
go back to reference Chen W, Giger M, Lan L, Bick U: Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys 31:1076–1082, 2004PubMedCrossRef Chen W, Giger M, Lan L, Bick U: Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys 31:1076–1082, 2004PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Unay D, Ekin A, Cetin M, Jasinschi R, Ercil A: Robustness of local binary patterns in brain MR image analysis. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2098–2101, 2007 Unay D, Ekin A, Cetin M, Jasinschi R, Ercil A: Robustness of local binary patterns in brain MR image analysis. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2098–2101, 2007
Metadata
Title
Textural Kinetics: A Novel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Feature for Breast Lesion Classification
Authors
Shannon C. Agner
Salil Soman
Edward Libfeld
Margie McDonald
Kathleen Thomas
Sarah Englander
Mark A. Rosen
Deanna Chin
John Nosher
Anant Madabhushi
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9298-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2011 Go to the issue