Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2010

01-02-2010

Variability of Semiautomated Lung Nodule Volumetry on Ultralow-Dose CT: Comparison with Nodule Volumetry on Standard-Dose CT

Authors: Patrick A. Hein, Valentina C. Romano, Patrik Rogalla, Christian Klessen, Alexander Lembcke, Lars Bornemann, Volker Dicken, Bernd Hamm, Hans-Christian Bauknecht

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The study investigates the effect of a substantial dose reduction on the variability of lung nodule volume measurements by assessing and comparing nodule volumes using a dedicated semiautomated segmentation software on ultralow-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) and standard-dose computed tomography (SD-CT) data. In 20 patients, thin-slice chest CT datasets (1 mm slice thickness; 20% reconstruction overlap) were acquired at ultralow-dose (120 kV, 5 mAs) and at standard-dose (120 kV, 75 mAs), respectively, and analyzed using the segmentation software OncoTREAT (MeVis, Bremen, Germany; version 1.3). Interobserver variability of volume measurements of 202 solid pulmonary nodules (mean diameter 11 mm, range 3.2–44.5 mm) was calculated for SD-CT and ULD-CT. With respect to interobserver variability, the 95% confidence interval for the relative differences in nodule volume in the intrascan analysis was measured with −9.7% to 8.3% (mean difference −0.7%) for SD-CT and with −12.6% to 12.4% (mean difference −0.2%) for ULD-CT. In the interscan analysis, the 95% confidence intervals for the differences in nodule volume ranged with −25.1% to −23.4% and 26.2% to 28.9% (mean difference 1.4% to 2.1%) dependent on the combination of readers and scans. Intrascan interobserver variability of volume measurements was comparable for ULD-CT and SD-CT data. The calculated variability of volume measurements in the interscan analysis was similar to the data reported in the literature for CT data acquired with equal radiation dose. Thus, the evaluated segmentation software provides nodule volumetry that appears to be independent of the dose level with which the CT source dataset is acquired.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Watanabe H, Yamamoto S, Kunitoh H, et al: Tumor response to chemotherapy: the validity and reproducibility of RECIST guidelines in NSCLC patients. Cancer Sci 94(11):1015–1020, 2003CrossRefPubMed Watanabe H, Yamamoto S, Kunitoh H, et al: Tumor response to chemotherapy: the validity and reproducibility of RECIST guidelines in NSCLC patients. Cancer Sci 94(11):1015–1020, 2003CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI: Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217(1):251–256, 2000PubMed Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI: Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217(1):251–256, 2000PubMed
3.
go back to reference Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Meyer CA, et al: Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations. Radiology 229(1):184–194, 2003CrossRefPubMed Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Meyer CA, et al: Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations. Radiology 229(1):184–194, 2003CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ko JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs EL, et al: Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT—phantom study. Radiology 228(3):864–870, 2003CrossRefPubMed Ko JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs EL, et al: Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT—phantom study. Radiology 228(3):864–870, 2003CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Revel MP, Lefort C, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Chatellier G, Frija G: Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. Radiology 231(2):459–466, 2004CrossRefPubMed Revel MP, Lefort C, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Chatellier G, Frija G: Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. Radiology 231(2):459–466, 2004CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ko JP, Chang J, Bomsztyk E, Babb JS, Naidich DP, Rusinek H: Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement. Radiology 237(1):83–88, 2005CrossRefPubMed Ko JP, Chang J, Bomsztyk E, Babb JS, Naidich DP, Rusinek H: Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement. Radiology 237(1):83–88, 2005CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bolte H, Riedel C, Knoss N, et al: Computed tomography-based lung nodule volumetry—do optimized reconstructions of routine protocols achieve similar accuracy, reproducibility and interobserver variability to that of special volumetry protocols? Rofo 179(3):276–281, 2007PubMed Bolte H, Riedel C, Knoss N, et al: Computed tomography-based lung nodule volumetry—do optimized reconstructions of routine protocols achieve similar accuracy, reproducibility and interobserver variability to that of special volumetry protocols? Rofo 179(3):276–281, 2007PubMed
8.
go back to reference Das M, Muhlenbruch G, Katoh M, et al: Automated volumetry of solid pulmonary nodules in a phantom: accuracy across different CT scanner technologies. Invest Radiol 42(5):297–302, 2007CrossRefPubMed Das M, Muhlenbruch G, Katoh M, et al: Automated volumetry of solid pulmonary nodules in a phantom: accuracy across different CT scanner technologies. Invest Radiol 42(5):297–302, 2007CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bolte H, Jahnke T, Schafer FK, et al: Interobserver-variability of lung nodule volumetry considering different segmentation algorithms and observer training levels. Eur J Radiol 64(2):285–295, 2007CrossRefPubMed Bolte H, Jahnke T, Schafer FK, et al: Interobserver-variability of lung nodule volumetry considering different segmentation algorithms and observer training levels. Eur J Radiol 64(2):285–295, 2007CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ravenel JG, Leue WM, Nietert PJ, et al: Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements—a phantom study. Radiology 247(2):400–408, 2008PubMed Ravenel JG, Leue WM, Nietert PJ, et al: Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements—a phantom study. Radiology 247(2):400–408, 2008PubMed
11.
go back to reference Larici AR, Storto ML, Torge M, et al: Automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules on multidetector CT: influence of slice thickness, reconstruction algorithm and tube current. Preliminary results. Radiol Med (Torino) 113(1):29–42, 2008CrossRef Larici AR, Storto ML, Torge M, et al: Automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules on multidetector CT: influence of slice thickness, reconstruction algorithm and tube current. Preliminary results. Radiol Med (Torino) 113(1):29–42, 2008CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, et al: Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222:773–781, 2002CrossRefPubMed Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, et al: Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222:773–781, 2002CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al: Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 226:756–761, 2003CrossRefPubMed Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al: Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 226:756–761, 2003CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gietema HA, Wang Y, Xu D, et al: Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements. Radiology 241(1):251–257, 2006CrossRefPubMed Gietema HA, Wang Y, Xu D, et al: Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements. Radiology 241(1):251–257, 2006CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al: Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14(1):86–92, 2004CrossRefPubMed Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al: Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14(1):86–92, 2004CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Goodman LR, Gulsun M, Washington L, Nagy PG, Piacsek KL: Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):989–994, 2006CrossRefPubMed Goodman LR, Gulsun M, Washington L, Nagy PG, Piacsek KL: Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):989–994, 2006CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, et al: Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT part 2. Therapy monitoring of pulmonary metastases. Radiographics 25(3):841–848, 2005CrossRefPubMed Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, et al: Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT part 2. Therapy monitoring of pulmonary metastases. Radiographics 25(3):841–848, 2005CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L, et al: Fast automated segmentation and reproducible volumetry of pulmonary metastases in CT-scans for therapy monitoring. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(4):417–434, 2006CrossRefPubMed Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L, et al: Fast automated segmentation and reproducible volumetry of pulmonary metastases in CT-scans for therapy monitoring. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(4):417–434, 2006CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wormanns D, Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Winter F, Heindel W: Spiral CT of pulmonary nodules: interobserver variation in assessment of lesion size. Eur Radiol 10(5):710–713, 2000CrossRefPubMed Wormanns D, Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Winter F, Heindel W: Spiral CT of pulmonary nodules: interobserver variation in assessment of lesion size. Eur Radiol 10(5):710–713, 2000CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, et al: Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2574–2582, 2003CrossRefPubMed Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, et al: Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2574–2582, 2003CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G: Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 231(2):453–458, 2004CrossRefPubMed Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G: Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 231(2):453–458, 2004CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Goo JM, Tongdee T, Tongdee R, Yeo K, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT: Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. Radiology 235(3):850–856, 2005CrossRefPubMed Goo JM, Tongdee T, Tongdee R, Yeo K, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT: Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. Radiology 235(3):850–856, 2005CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Boll DT, Gilkeson RC, Fleiter TR, Blackham KA, Duerk JL, Lewin JS: Volumetric assessment of pulmonary nodules with ECG-gated MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1217–1223, 2004PubMed Boll DT, Gilkeson RC, Fleiter TR, Blackham KA, Duerk JL, Lewin JS: Volumetric assessment of pulmonary nodules with ECG-gated MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1217–1223, 2004PubMed
24.
go back to reference Volterrani L, Mazzei MA, Scialpi M, et al: Three-dimensional analysis of pulmonary nodules by MSCT with Advanced Lung Analysis (ALA1) software. Radiol Med (Torino) 111(3):343–354, 2006CrossRef Volterrani L, Mazzei MA, Scialpi M, et al: Three-dimensional analysis of pulmonary nodules by MSCT with Advanced Lung Analysis (ALA1) software. Radiol Med (Torino) 111(3):343–354, 2006CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Variability of Semiautomated Lung Nodule Volumetry on Ultralow-Dose CT: Comparison with Nodule Volumetry on Standard-Dose CT
Authors
Patrick A. Hein
Valentina C. Romano
Patrik Rogalla
Christian Klessen
Alexander Lembcke
Lars Bornemann
Volker Dicken
Bernd Hamm
Hans-Christian Bauknecht
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9157-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2010 Go to the issue