Top

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine

Published in:

Open Access 01-06-2007

Medical Imaging Informatics: How It Improves Radiology Practice Today

Author: J. Raymond Geis

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 2/2007

Excerpt

“Great case, next case.” …

Andriole KP: Introduction to medical imaging informatics. Cancer Informatics: (in press), 2007

Sinha U, Bui A: A review of medical informatics. Ann NY Acad Sci 980:168–197, 2002PubMedCrossRef

Kulikowski C, Ammenwerth E, Bohne A, et al: Medical imaging informatics and medical informatics: opportunities and constraints. Findings from the IMIA yearbook of medical informatics 2002. Methods Inf Med 41(2):183–189, 2002PubMed

Siegel EL: Productivity in the 3rd and 4th dimensions. Presentation at SCAR 2006 Annual Meeting, April 27–30, 2006: Austin, TX

Majnerd HB, Zandin KB: Maynard’s Industrial Engineering Handbook, 5th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001

Rana DX, Hurst G, Shepstone L, Pilling J, Cockburn J, Crawford M: Voice recognition for radiology reporting: is it good enough? Clin Radiol 60(11):1205–1212, 2005PubMedCrossRef

Gale B, Safriel Y, Lukban A, Kalowitz J, Fleischer J, Gordon D: Radiology report production times: voice recognition vs. transcription. Radiol Manage 23(2):18–22, 2001PubMed

Hayt DB, Alexander S: The pros and cons of implementing PACS and speech recognition systems. J Digit Imaging 14(3):149–157, 2001PubMedCrossRef

Leslie A, Jones AJ, Goddard PR: The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists. Br J Radiol 73(874):1052–1055, 2000PubMed

10.

Loy CT, Irwig L: Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA 292(13):1602–1609, 2004PubMedCrossRef

11.

Carrino JA: Digital imaging overview. Semin Roentgenol 38(3):200–215, 2003PubMedCrossRef

12.

Aldrich JE, Rutledge JD: Assessment of PACS display systems. JDI 18(4):287–295, 2005

13.

Seto E, Ursani A, Cafazzo JA, Rossos PG, Easty AC: Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems. JDI 18(4):280–286, 2005

14.

Hirschorn D, Dreyer K: Comparison of consumer grade displays to medical grade displays for the primary interpretation of radiography. SCAR 2006 Scientific Abstract Book. Great Falls, VA: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, 2006, pp 1–2

15.

Krupinski EA: Medical image perception and large image datasets in the digital reading room. In: Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Erickson BJ Eds. SCAR University Primer 6: Decision Support in the Digital Medical Enterprise. Great Falls, VA: SCAR Press, 2005, pp 105–119

16.

Moise A, Atkins S: Impact of ergonomic controls on observer performance in a radiology look-alike task. Paper presented at MIPS X Conference. Durham NC, September 11–14, 2003

17.

Moise A, Atkins MS: Design requirements for radiology workstations. JDI 17(2):92–99, 2004

18.

Larici AR, Gotway MB, Litt HI, Reddy GP, Webb WR, Gotway CA, Dawn SK, Marder SR, Sorto ML: Helical CT with sagittal and coronal reconstructions: accuracy for detection of diaphragmatic injury. AJR AM J Roentgenol 179(2):451–457, 2002PubMed

19.

Krupinski EA: Computer-aided detection in clinical environment: benefits and challenges for radiologists. Radiology 231(1):208–214, 2004CrossRef

20.

Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Zidowitz S, Bornemann L, Kuemmerlen B, Krass S, Peitgen HO, Yuval S, Jend HH, Rau WS, Achenbach T: Informatics in radiology (info RAD): New tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT. Part 1. Functional analysis of lungs, lung lobes, and bronchopulmonary segments. Radiographics 25(2):525–536, 2005PubMedCrossRef

21.

Kauczor HU: Multimodal imaging and computer assisted diagnosis for functional tumor characterization. Cancer Imaging 5(1):46–50, 2005PubMed

22.

Whelan PF, Sadleir RJ, Ghita O: Informatics in radiology (infoRAD: NeatVision: visual programming for computer-aided diagnostic applications. Radiographics 24(6):1779–1789, 2004PubMedCrossRef

23.

Carrino JA, Ohno-Machado L: Development of radiology prediction models using feature analysis. Acad Radiol 12(4):415–421, 2005PubMedCrossRef

24.

Hein E, Albrecht, A, Melzer D, Steinhofel K, Rogalia P, Hamm B, Taupitz M: Computer-assisted diagnosis of focal liver lesions on CT images: evaluation of the Perceptron algorithm. Acad Radiol 12(9):1205–1210, 2005PubMedCrossRef

25.

Kahn CE: Improving outcomes in radiology: bringing computer-based decision support and education to the point of care. Acad Radiol 12(4):409–414, 2005PubMedCrossRef

26.

Siegel EL, Reiner B: Image workflow. In: Dreyer KJ, Mehta A, Thrall JH Eds. PACS: A Guide to the Digital Revolution. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp 161–190

27.

Westbrook JI, Gosling AS, Colera EW: The impact of an online evidence system on confidence in decision making in a controlled setting. Med Decis Mak 25(2):178–185, 2005CrossRef

28.

Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR: Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinical preferences regarding style and content. AJR AM J Roentgenol 176(3):591–598, 2001PubMed

29.

Aas IH, Geitung JT: Teleradiology and picture archiving and communications systems: changed pattern of communication between clinicians and radiologists. J Telemed Telecare 11(Suppl 1):20–22, 2005PubMedCrossRef

30.

Sistrom CL, Honeyman-Buck J: Free text versus structured format: information transfer efficiency of radiology reports. AJR AM J Roentgenol 185(3):804–812, 2005PubMed

Title: Medical Imaging Informatics: How It Improves Radiology Practice Today
Author: J. Raymond Geis
Publication date: 01-06-2007
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9010-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Medical Imaging Informatics: How It Improves Radiology Practice Today

Excerpt

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Comparison of Color LCD and Medical-grade Monochrome LCD Displays in Diagnostic Radiology

A Filmless Radiology Department in a Full Digital Regional Hospital: Quantitative Evaluation of the Increased Quality and Efficiency

Quality of Compressed Medical Images

Content-based Retrieval of Mammograms Using Visual Features Related to Breast Density Patterns

Incorporation of a Laguerre–Gauss Channelized Hotelling Observer for False-Positive Reduction in a Mammographic Mass CAD System

Effect of Automated Image Registration on Radiologist Interpretation