Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics 2/2007

01-06-2007 | Editorial

The time for cost-effectiveness in the new European Union member states: the development and role of health economics and technology assessment in the mirror of the Hungarian experience

Author: László Gulácsi

Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Sophisticated methodology and research centres of health economics and health technology assessment were established in the developed countries over the past 30 years, releasing more and more studies of better and better quality every year. A crucial factor in health policy and reimbursement decisions in these countries is cost-effectiveness results. Due to methodological diversification, results of locally performed health economics studies are constrained in international utility. This fact encourages us to set the current goal of greatest importance, i.e. to standardise country-specific methods, thereby promoting transferability and adaptability of results, being backed by each important health care organisation all over Europe. The situation in the new member states [European Union (EU)12] is profoundly different compared with EU15. In these countries, neither the necessary research institutions nor professionals are in place in sufficient numbers; even in most EU12 countries, the importance of cost-effectiveness has not yet been realised. The present study focuses mainly on the EU12. These countries are absolutely dependent on cost-effectiveness results from abroad, and this seems to persist in the long-term. Transferability and adaptability of the results of health economics studies carried out elsewhere through European collaboration is vital for these countries.
Footnotes
1
New member states (number of inhabitants in brackets): Bulgaria (7.4), Czech Republic (10.22 million inhabitants), Cyprus (0.69), Estonia (1.37), Hungary (10.15), Latvia (2.35), Lithuania (3.49), Malta (0.38), Poland (38.72), Romania (22.3), Slovak Republic (5.41), Slovenia (1.97).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Drummond, M.F.: Will there ever be a European drug pricing and reimbursement agency? Eur. J. Health Econ. 4, 67–69 (2003) Drummond, M.F.: Will there ever be a European drug pricing and reimbursement agency? Eur. J. Health Econ. 4, 67–69 (2003)
2.
go back to reference Drummond, M.F., Manca, A., Schulpher, M.: Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 21(2), 165–172 (2005) Drummond, M.F., Manca, A., Schulpher, M.: Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 21(2), 165–172 (2005)
3.
go back to reference Jönsson, B.: Time for a common standard for cost-effectiveness in Europe. Eur. J. Health Econ. 7, 223–224 (2006)CrossRef Jönsson, B.: Time for a common standard for cost-effectiveness in Europe. Eur. J. Health Econ. 7, 223–224 (2006)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tam, T.Y., Smith, M.D.: Pharmacoeconomic guidelines around the world. ISPOR, CONNECTIONS 10, 4–5 (2004) Tam, T.Y., Smith, M.D.: Pharmacoeconomic guidelines around the world. ISPOR, CONNECTIONS 10, 4–5 (2004)
5.
go back to reference Boulenger, S., Nixon, J., Drummond, M.F., Ulmann, P., Rice, S., Pouvourville, G.: Can economic evaluations be made more transferable? Eur. J. Health Econ. 6(4), 134–147 (2005)CrossRef Boulenger, S., Nixon, J., Drummond, M.F., Ulmann, P., Rice, S., Pouvourville, G.: Can economic evaluations be made more transferable? Eur. J. Health Econ. 6(4), 134–147 (2005)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Baltussen, R., Brouwer, W., Niessen, L.: Cost-effectiveness analysis for priority setting in health: penny-wise but pound-foolish. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 21.4, 532–534 (2005) Baltussen, R., Brouwer, W., Niessen, L.: Cost-effectiveness analysis for priority setting in health: penny-wise but pound-foolish. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 21.4, 532–534 (2005)
7.
go back to reference Polder, J.J., Meerding, W.J., Bonneux, l., van der Maas, P.J.: A cross-national perspective on cost of illness. Eur. J. Health Econ. 50, 223–232 (2005)CrossRef Polder, J.J., Meerding, W.J., Bonneux, l., van der Maas, P.J.: A cross-national perspective on cost of illness. Eur. J. Health Econ. 50, 223–232 (2005)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kobelt, G.: Health economic issues in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 35, 415–425 (2006)CrossRef Kobelt, G.: Health economic issues in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 35, 415–425 (2006)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mittendorf, T., Merkesdal, S., Huelsemann, J.L., von der Schulemburg, M., Zeidler, H., Ruof, J.: Implementing standardized cost categories within economic evaluations in musculoskeletal diseases. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4, 43–49 (2003)CrossRef Mittendorf, T., Merkesdal, S., Huelsemann, J.L., von der Schulemburg, M., Zeidler, H., Ruof, J.: Implementing standardized cost categories within economic evaluations in musculoskeletal diseases. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4, 43–49 (2003)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Donaldson, C., Farrar, S.: Needs assessment: developing an economic approach. Health Policy 25, 95–108 (1993)CrossRef Donaldson, C., Farrar, S.: Needs assessment: developing an economic approach. Health Policy 25, 95–108 (1993)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cochrane, A.: Effectiveness and efficiency. The Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust, London (1971) Cochrane, A.: Effectiveness and efficiency. The Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust, London (1971)
12.
go back to reference Gulácsi, L., Boncz, I., Drummond, M.: Issues for countries considering introducing the ‘fourth hurdle’: the case of Hungary. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 20(2), 1–5 (2004) Gulácsi, L., Boncz, I., Drummond, M.: Issues for countries considering introducing the ‘fourth hurdle’: the case of Hungary. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 20(2), 1–5 (2004)
13.
go back to reference Kárpáti, K., Brandtmüller, Á., Májer, I., Gulácsi, L.: Rangsorolás az egészségügyben; gyógyszer-támogatási prioritások Magyarországon 2004-ben. Acta Pharm. Hung. 76(4), 191–199 (2006) Kárpáti, K., Brandtmüller, Á., Májer, I., Gulácsi, L.: Rangsorolás az egészségügyben; gyógyszer-támogatási prioritások Magyarországon 2004-ben. Acta Pharm. Hung. 76(4), 191–199 (2006)
14.
go back to reference Klazinga, N.: A better use of existing resources; managing the quality of structure, process and outcome of health care system. J. Int. Bioethique 7(2), 90–93 (1996) Klazinga, N.: A better use of existing resources; managing the quality of structure, process and outcome of health care system. J. Int. Bioethique 7(2), 90–93 (1996)
15.
go back to reference Boncz, I.: Financial deficits in the health services of UK and Hungary. Lancet 368, 917–918 (2006)CrossRef Boncz, I.: Financial deficits in the health services of UK and Hungary. Lancet 368, 917–918 (2006)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Boncz, I., Dózsa, C.S., Kaló, Z., Nagy, L., Borcsek, B., Brandtmüller, Á., Betlehem, J., Sebestyén, A., Gulácsi, L.: Development of health economics in Hungary between 1990–2006. Eur. J. Health Econ. 7(Suppl 1), 4–6 (2006) Boncz, I., Dózsa, C.S., Kaló, Z., Nagy, L., Borcsek, B., Brandtmüller, Á., Betlehem, J., Sebestyén, A., Gulácsi, L.: Development of health economics in Hungary between 1990–2006. Eur. J. Health Econ. 7(Suppl 1), 4–6 (2006)
17.
go back to reference Methodological guidelines for conducting economic evaluation of health care interventions in Hungary. Off. J. Minist. Health Soc. Fam. Aff. Bp. 52(11), 1314–1334 (2002) Methodological guidelines for conducting economic evaluation of health care interventions in Hungary. Off. J. Minist. Health Soc. Fam. Aff. Bp. 52(11), 1314–1334 (2002)
18.
go back to reference Szende, A., Mogyorosy, Z., Muszbek, N., Nagy, J., Pallos, G., Dózsa, C.S.: Methodological guidelines for conducting economic evaluation of healthcare interventions in Hungary: a Hungarian proposal for methodology standard. Eur. J. Health Econ. 3, 196–206 (2002)CrossRef Szende, A., Mogyorosy, Z., Muszbek, N., Nagy, J., Pallos, G., Dózsa, C.S.: Methodological guidelines for conducting economic evaluation of healthcare interventions in Hungary: a Hungarian proposal for methodology standard. Eur. J. Health Econ. 3, 196–206 (2002)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Orlewska, E., Mierzejwski, P.: Project of Polish guidelines for conducting pharmacoeconomic evaluations in comparison to international health economic guidelines. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4, 296–303 (2003)CrossRef Orlewska, E., Mierzejwski, P.: Project of Polish guidelines for conducting pharmacoeconomic evaluations in comparison to international health economic guidelines. Eur. J. Health Econ. 4, 296–303 (2003)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lepp-Gazdag, A., Gulácsi, L., Brandtmüller, Á., Dávid, T. A rheumatoid arthritis megbetegedés és az ellátás jellemzői Magyarországon. Egészségügyi Gazdasági Szemle 40(6):645–657 (2002) Lepp-Gazdag, A., Gulácsi, L., Brandtmüller, Á., Dávid, T. A rheumatoid arthritis megbetegedés és az ellátás jellemzői Magyarországon. Egészségügyi Gazdasági Szemle 40(6):645–657 (2002)
21.
go back to reference Kiss, C.G., Lovei, C., Suto, G., et al.: Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in the South-Transdanubian region of Hungary based on a representative survey of 10,000 inhabitants. J. Rheumatol. 32, 1688–1690 (2005) Kiss, C.G., Lovei, C., Suto, G., et al.: Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in the South-Transdanubian region of Hungary based on a representative survey of 10,000 inhabitants. J. Rheumatol. 32, 1688–1690 (2005)
22.
go back to reference Péntek M., Kobelt G., Czirják L., Szekanecz Z., Poór G., Rojkovich B., Polgár A., Genti G., Kiss C.G., Brodszky V., Májer I., Gulácsi L.: Costs of rheumatoid arthritis in Hungary. J. Rheumatol. (2007) (in press) Péntek M., Kobelt G., Czirják L., Szekanecz Z., Poór G., Rojkovich B., Polgár A., Genti G., Kiss C.G., Brodszky V., Májer I., Gulácsi L.: Costs of rheumatoid arthritis in Hungary. J. Rheumatol. (2007) (in press)
23.
go back to reference Buxton, M.: How much are health-care systems prepared to produce a qualy. Eur. J. Health Econ. 6, 285–287 (2005)CrossRef Buxton, M.: How much are health-care systems prepared to produce a qualy. Eur. J. Health Econ. 6, 285–287 (2005)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The time for cost-effectiveness in the new European Union member states: the development and role of health economics and technology assessment in the mirror of the Hungarian experience
Author
László Gulácsi
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Electronic ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-007-0046-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

The European Journal of Health Economics 2/2007 Go to the issue