Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics 2/2007

01-06-2007 | Original Paper

Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system

Authors: K. Le Lay, E. Myon, S. Hill, L. Riou-Franca, D. Scott, M. Sidhu, D. Dunlop, R. Launois

Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommends vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel, docetaxel, and gemcitabine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. An economic model was prepared to determine the comparative cost of these agents, including the new oral formulation of VNB from a United Kingdom National Health System perspective. Clinical effectiveness was determined from published trials. Costs of drug acquisition, administration, toxicity management, and patient transportation costs were calculated from reference publications. A Markov model was used to estimate the cost per patient over 52 weeks. Intravenous VNB, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel incur annual follow-up costs of £3,746, £5,332, £5,977, and £6,766, respectively, while oral VNB with outpatient administration on d1, and self-administration at home on d8 every 21 days has a cost per patient per year of £2,888. Oral VNB allows further hospital resources savings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Guidance on the use of docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Technol. Appraisal Guid. 26 (2001) National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Guidance on the use of docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Technol. Appraisal Guid. 26 (2001)
2.
go back to reference Clegg, A., Scott, D.A., Sidhu, M., et al.: A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer. Health Technol. Assess. 5(32), 1–195, 55 (2001) Clegg, A., Scott, D.A., Sidhu, M., et al.: A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer. Health Technol. Assess. 5(32), 1–195, 55 (2001)
3.
go back to reference Le Lay, K., Riou-Franca, L., Launois, R.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral chemotherapy in ambulatory care: the example of vinorelbine. J. Econ. Méd. 20(7–8), 379–400 (2002) Le Lay, K., Riou-Franca, L., Launois, R.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral chemotherapy in ambulatory care: the example of vinorelbine. J. Econ. Méd. 20(7–8), 379–400 (2002)
5.
go back to reference Le Chevalier, T., Brisgand, D., Soria, J.C., et al.: Long term analysis of survival in the European randomized trial comparing vinorelbine/cisplatin to vindesine/cisplatin and vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 6(Suppl. 1), 8–11 (2001)CrossRef Le Chevalier, T., Brisgand, D., Soria, J.C., et al.: Long term analysis of survival in the European randomized trial comparing vinorelbine/cisplatin to vindesine/cisplatin and vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 6(Suppl. 1), 8–11 (2001)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ten Bokkel Huinink, W., Bergman, B., Chemaissani, A., et al.: Single agent gemcitabine: an active and better tolerated alternative to standard cisplatin based chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer 26(2), 85–94 (1999)CrossRef Ten Bokkel Huinink, W., Bergman, B., Chemaissani, A., et al.: Single agent gemcitabine: an active and better tolerated alternative to standard cisplatin based chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer 26(2), 85–94 (1999)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roszkowski, K., Pluzanska, A., Krzakowski, M., et al.: A multicentre, randomized study of docetaxel plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic or non resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 27, 145–157 (2000)CrossRef Roszkowski, K., Pluzanska, A., Krzakowski, M., et al.: A multicentre, randomized study of docetaxel plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic or non resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 27, 145–157 (2000)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ranson, M., Davidson, N., Nicolson, M., et al.: Randomized trial of paclitaxel plus supportive care versus supportive care for patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(13), 1074–1080 (2000)CrossRef Ranson, M., Davidson, N., Nicolson, M., et al.: Randomized trial of paclitaxel plus supportive care versus supportive care for patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(13), 1074–1080 (2000)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Crawford, J.: Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with stage IV non small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 14(10), 2774–2784 (1996) Crawford, J.: Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with stage IV non small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 14(10), 2774–2784 (1996)
10.
go back to reference Depierre, A.: Vinorelbine vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin in advanced non small cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 5, 37–42 (1994) Depierre, A.: Vinorelbine vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin in advanced non small cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 5, 37–42 (1994)
11.
go back to reference Jassem, J., Ramlau, R., Karnicka-Mlodkowska, H., et al.: A multicentre randomized phase II study vs. intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 12, 1375–1381 (2001)CrossRef Jassem, J., Ramlau, R., Karnicka-Mlodkowska, H., et al.: A multicentre randomized phase II study vs. intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 12, 1375–1381 (2001)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Perng, R.P.: Gemcitabine vs the combination of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with inoperable non small cell lung cancer in phase II randomized study. J. Clin. Oncol. 15(5), 2097–2102 (1997) Perng, R.P.: Gemcitabine vs the combination of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with inoperable non small cell lung cancer in phase II randomized study. J. Clin. Oncol. 15(5), 2097–2102 (1997)
13.
go back to reference Anderson, H., Hopwood, P., Stephens, R.J., et al.: Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer—a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Br. J. Cancer 83(4), 447–453 (2000) Anderson, H., Hopwood, P., Stephens, R.J., et al.: Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer—a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Br. J. Cancer 83(4), 447–453 (2000)
14.
go back to reference Weinstein, M.C., Siegel, J.E., Gold, M.R., Kamlet, M.S., Russel, L.B.: Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 276(15), 1553–1558 (1996)CrossRef Weinstein, M.C., Siegel, J.E., Gold, M.R., Kamlet, M.S., Russel, L.B.: Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 276(15), 1553–1558 (1996)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Miller, D.K., Homan, S.M.: Determining transition probabilities: confusion and suggestions. Med. Decis. Making 14, 52–58 (1994)CrossRef Miller, D.K., Homan, S.M.: Determining transition probabilities: confusion and suggestions. Med. Decis. Making 14, 52–58 (1994)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Varney, S.J., Guest, J.F.: The annual cost of blood transfusions in UK. Transfus. Med. 13, 205–218 (2003)CrossRef Varney, S.J., Guest, J.F.: The annual cost of blood transfusions in UK. Transfus. Med. 13, 205–218 (2003)CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cooper, N., Abrams, K.R., Sutton, A.J., Turner, D., Lambert, P.C.: A Bayesian approach to Markov modelling in cost-effectiveness analyses: application to taxane use in advanced breast cancer. J. R. Stat. Soc. 166, 389–405 (2003)CrossRef Cooper, N., Abrams, K.R., Sutton, A.J., Turner, D., Lambert, P.C.: A Bayesian approach to Markov modelling in cost-effectiveness analyses: application to taxane use in advanced breast cancer. J. R. Stat. Soc. 166, 389–405 (2003)CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Berkowitz, N.C., Silberman, G., Gupta, S., Leyland-Jones, B.: Comparing the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Manag. Care Cancer 1(5), 18–25 (1999) Berkowitz, N.C., Silberman, G., Gupta, S., Leyland-Jones, B.: Comparing the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Manag. Care Cancer 1(5), 18–25 (1999)
19.
go back to reference Gregor, A., Thomson, C.S., Brewster, D.H., et al.: Management and survival of patients with lung cancer in Scotland diagnosed in 1995: results of a national population based study. Thorax 56, 212–217 (2001)CrossRef Gregor, A., Thomson, C.S., Brewster, D.H., et al.: Management and survival of patients with lung cancer in Scotland diagnosed in 1995: results of a national population based study. Thorax 56, 212–217 (2001)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (BNF) 47: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2004) Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (BNF) 47: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2004)
22.
go back to reference Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care: Public Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). University of Kent, Canterbury (2002) Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care: Public Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). University of Kent, Canterbury (2002)
23.
go back to reference Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care: Public Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). University of Kent, Canterbury (2003) Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care: Public Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). University of Kent, Canterbury (2003)
26.
go back to reference Gridelli, C.: Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non small non cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91(1), 66–72 (1999)CrossRef Gridelli, C.: Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non small non cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91(1), 66–72 (1999)CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Berthelot, J.M., Will, B.P., Evans, W.K., et al.: Decision framework for chemotherapic interventions for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(16), 1321–1329 (2000)CrossRef Berthelot, J.M., Will, B.P., Evans, W.K., et al.: Decision framework for chemotherapic interventions for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(16), 1321–1329 (2000)CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Earle, C.C., Evans, W.K.: A comparison of costs of paclitaxel and best supportive care in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Prev. Control 1, 282–288 (1997) Earle, C.C., Evans, W.K.: A comparison of costs of paclitaxel and best supportive care in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Prev. Control 1, 282–288 (1997)
29.
go back to reference Smith, T.J., Hillner, B.E., Neighbors, D.M., et al.: Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatine, vindesine plus cisplatine for non-small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 2166–2173 (1995) Smith, T.J., Hillner, B.E., Neighbors, D.M., et al.: Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatine, vindesine plus cisplatine for non-small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 2166–2173 (1995)
30.
go back to reference Hillner, B.E., Smith, T.J.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of three regimens using vinorelbine for non-small cell lung cancer. Semin. Oncol. 23, 25–30 (1995) Hillner, B.E., Smith, T.J.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of three regimens using vinorelbine for non-small cell lung cancer. Semin. Oncol. 23, 25–30 (1995)
Metadata
Title
Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system
Authors
K. Le Lay
E. Myon
S. Hill
L. Riou-Franca
D. Scott
M. Sidhu
D. Dunlop
R. Launois
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Electronic ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-006-0034-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

The European Journal of Health Economics 2/2007 Go to the issue