Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 3/2015

Open Access 01-09-2015 | Original Article

Barbed suture vs conventional tenorrhaphy: biomechanical analysis in an animal model

Authors: A. Clemente, F. Bergamin, C. Surace, E. Lepore, N. Pugno

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The advantages of barbed suture for tendon repair could be to eliminate the need for a knot and to better distribute the load throughout the tendon so as to reduce the deformation at the repair site. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the breaking force and the repair site deformation of a new barbed tenorrhaphy technique in an animal model.

Materials and methods

Sixty porcine flexor tendons were divided randomly into three groups and repaired with one of the following techniques: a new 4-strand barbed technique using 2/0 polypropylene Quill™ SRS or 2/0 polydioxanone Quill™ SRS and a modified Kessler technique using 3/0 prolene. All tendons underwent mechanical testing to assess the 2-mm gap formation force, the breaking force and the mode of failure. The percentage change in tendon cross-sectional area before and after repair was calculated.

Results

The two-sample Student t-test demonstrated a significant increase in 2-mm gap formation force and in breaking force with barbed sutures, independently from suture material, when compared to traditional Kessler suture. Concerning the tendon profile, we registered less bunching at the repair site in the two barbed groups compared with the Kessler group.

Conclusions

This study confirms the promising results achieved in previous ex vivo studies about the use of barbed suture in flexor tendon repair. In our animal model, tenorrhaphy with Quill™ SRS suture guarantees a breaking force of repair that exceeds the 40–50 N suggested as sufficient to initiate early active motion, and a smoother profile at the repair site.
Level of evidence Not applicable.
Footnotes
1
The articles cited in the literature improperly use the term “tensile strength”, which is force per unit area, as they present the measured data in Newtons (the SI derived unit of force). Therefore, in this paper only the correct term of “breaking force” will be utilized.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference McKenzie AR (1967) An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palm and fingers. Preliminary report. J Bone Jt Surg Br 49(3):440–447 McKenzie AR (1967) An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palm and fingers. Preliminary report. J Bone Jt Surg Br 49(3):440–447
2.
go back to reference McKenzie AR (1967) Function after reconstruction of severed long flexor tendons of the hand. A review of 297 tendons. J Bone Jt Surg Br 49(3):424–439 McKenzie AR (1967) Function after reconstruction of severed long flexor tendons of the hand. A review of 297 tendons. J Bone Jt Surg Br 49(3):424–439
3.
go back to reference Havulinna J et al (2011) Comparison of modified Kessler tendon suture at different levels in the human flexor digitorumprofundus tendon and porcine flexors and porcine extensors: an experimental biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 36(8):670–676PubMedCrossRef Havulinna J et al (2011) Comparison of modified Kessler tendon suture at different levels in the human flexor digitorumprofundus tendon and porcine flexors and porcine extensors: an experimental biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 36(8):670–676PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rashid R, Sartori M, White LE et al (2007) Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers. Arch Dermatol 143(7):869–872PubMedCrossRef Rashid R, Sartori M, White LE et al (2007) Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers. Arch Dermatol 143(7):869–872PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Parikh PM, Davison SP, Higgins JP (2009) Barbed suture tenorrhaphy: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1551–1558PubMedCrossRef Parikh PM, Davison SP, Higgins JP (2009) Barbed suture tenorrhaphy: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1551–1558PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Trocchia AM, Aho HN, Sobol G (2009) A re-exploration of the use of barbed suture in flexor tendon repairs. Orthopedics 32:731–735CrossRef Trocchia AM, Aho HN, Sobol G (2009) A re-exploration of the use of barbed suture in flexor tendon repairs. Orthopedics 32:731–735CrossRef
7.
go back to reference McClellan WT, Schessler MJ, Ruch DS et al (2011) A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(4):322e–327ePubMedCrossRef McClellan WT, Schessler MJ, Ruch DS et al (2011) A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(4):322e–327ePubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference McDowell CL, Marqueen TJ, Yager D et al (2002) Characterization of the tensile properties and histologic/biochemical changes in normal chicken tendon at the site of suture insertion. J Hand Surg 27A:605–614CrossRef McDowell CL, Marqueen TJ, Yager D et al (2002) Characterization of the tensile properties and histologic/biochemical changes in normal chicken tendon at the site of suture insertion. J Hand Surg 27A:605–614CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hitchcock TF, Light TR, Bunch WH et al (1987) The effect of immediate constrained digital motion on the strength of flexor tendon repairs in chickens. J Hand Surg 12A:590–595CrossRef Hitchcock TF, Light TR, Bunch WH et al (1987) The effect of immediate constrained digital motion on the strength of flexor tendon repairs in chickens. J Hand Surg 12A:590–595CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wada A, Kubota H, Miyanishi K et al (2001) Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilizing four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg 26B:301–306CrossRef Wada A, Kubota H, Miyanishi K et al (2001) Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilizing four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg 26B:301–306CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Amadio P, An KN, Ejeskar A et al (2005) IFSSH flexor tendon committee report. J Hand Surg (Br.) 30:100–116 Amadio P, An KN, Ejeskar A et al (2005) IFSSH flexor tendon committee report. J Hand Surg (Br.) 30:100–116
12.
go back to reference Momose T, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Zobitz ME et al (2000) The effect of knot location, suture material and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. J Biomed Mater Res 53:806–811PubMedCrossRef Momose T, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Zobitz ME et al (2000) The effect of knot location, suture material and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. J Biomed Mater Res 53:806–811PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zeplin PH, Henle M, Zahn RK et al (2012) Tensile strength of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material in a dynamic ex vivo model. J Hand Microsurg 4(1):16–20PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zeplin PH, Henle M, Zahn RK et al (2012) Tensile strength of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material in a dynamic ex vivo model. J Hand Microsurg 4(1):16–20PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Barbed suture vs conventional tenorrhaphy: biomechanical analysis in an animal model
Authors
A. Clemente
F. Bergamin
C. Surace
E. Lepore
N. Pugno
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1590-9921
Electronic ISSN: 1590-9999
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0333-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 3/2015 Go to the issue