Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Fecal Incontinence | Original Article

Assessing the effectiveness of laser fistulectomy for anal fistula: a retrospective cohort study

Authors: D. E. Brabender, K. L. Moran, M. Brady, J. C. Carmichael, S. Mills, A. Pigazzi, M. J. Stamos, M. D. Jafari

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laser fistulectomy is a minimally invasive, sphincter-sparing procedure for treatment of anal fistula. In several studies, this method has been shown to be safe and effective, with reported success rates ranging from 40 to 88%. We hypothesized that with longer follow-up, these rates would decrease.

Methods

A retrospective case analysis assessing the effectiveness of laser fistulectomy in curing fistula-in-ano tracts within a cohort of patients at a single academic institution was conducted. All patients having laser ablation between March 2016 and July 2018 were analyzed. Cure of the fistula was determined by history and postoperative physical exam, and was defined as complete closure of fistula tract with resolution of symptoms. Secondary symptoms of fecal incontinence, infection, and pain were evaluated.

Results

Eighteen patients (10 males, mean age 41 ± 13 years) were analyzed. Transphincteric fistula was the most common type (67%, N = 12). The mean number of previous fistula procedures was 1.33 ± 1.64. There was a 22% (N = 4) success rate at an average postoperative follow-up period of 29 ± 8 months (range 18–46 months). Of those who failed, 64% (N = 9) had a subsequent fistula procedure. There were no cases of fecal incontinence, but 3 cases (17%) of postoperative infection were reported and 8 patients (44%) had a subjective increase in pain at first follow-up appointment.

Conclusions

Our data showed a much higher failure rate of laser fistulectomy compared to those reported in the literature. However, the small sample size, a large amount of heterogeneity in our patient population with a mixture of fistula types present, and various laser techniques applied decreased the power of this study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dudukgian H, Abcarian H (2011) Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula? World J Gastroenterol 17(28):3292–3296CrossRef Dudukgian H, Abcarian H (2011) Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula? World J Gastroenterol 17(28):3292–3296CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Narang SK, Keogh K, Alam NN, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2017) A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Surgeon 15:30–39CrossRef Narang SK, Keogh K, Alam NN, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2017) A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Surgeon 15:30–39CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15:445–449CrossRef Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15:445–449CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Giamundo P, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M (2014) Closure of fistula-in-ano with laser - FiLaC™: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease. Colorectal Dis 16(2):110–115CrossRef Giamundo P, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M (2014) Closure of fistula-in-ano with laser - FiLaC™: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease. Colorectal Dis 16(2):110–115CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Adegbola SO, Sahnan K, Pellino G et al (2017) Short-term efficacy and safety of three novel sphincter-sparing techniques for anal fistulae: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 21:775CrossRef Adegbola SO, Sahnan K, Pellino G et al (2017) Short-term efficacy and safety of three novel sphincter-sparing techniques for anal fistulae: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 21:775CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Carvalho ALD, Alves Filho EF, Alcantara RSMD, Barreto MDS (2017) FILAC—Fistula—tract laser closure: a sphincter-preserving procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulas. J Coloproctol 37(2):160–162 (ISSN 2237-9363)CrossRef Carvalho ALD, Alves Filho EF, Alcantara RSMD, Barreto MDS (2017) FILAC—Fistula—tract laser closure: a sphincter-preserving procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulas. J Coloproctol 37(2):160–162 (ISSN 2237-9363)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M (2015) Fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaCTM): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol 19:449–453CrossRef Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M (2015) Fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaCTM): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol 19:449–453CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Öztürk E, Gülcü B (2014) Laser ablation of fistula tract: a sphincter-preserving method for treating fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 57:360–364CrossRef Öztürk E, Gülcü B (2014) Laser ablation of fistula tract: a sphincter-preserving method for treating fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 57:360–364CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dixon M, Root J, Grant S, Stamos MJ (2004) Endorectal flap advancement repair is an effective treatment for selected patients with anorectal fistulas. Am Surg 70(10):925–927PubMed Dixon M, Root J, Grant S, Stamos MJ (2004) Endorectal flap advancement repair is an effective treatment for selected patients with anorectal fistulas. Am Surg 70(10):925–927PubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessing the effectiveness of laser fistulectomy for anal fistula: a retrospective cohort study
Authors
D. E. Brabender
K. L. Moran
M. Brady
J. C. Carmichael
S. Mills
A. Pigazzi
M. J. Stamos
M. D. Jafari
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02281-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Techniques in Coloproctology 10/2020 Go to the issue