Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Rectal Cancer | Original Article

The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer

Authors: A. Patel, N. Green, P. Sarmah, G. Langman, K. Chandrakumaran, H. Youssef

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to determine if the nature of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement, either by tumour or lymph nodes, had an impact upon local recurrence and survival in rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Consecutive patients with stage I-III rectal cancer having curative surgery were included. All specimens were analysed by a single histopathologist. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test and Kaplan–Meier.

Results

Of 265 patients, 29 (11%) had a positive CRM. Compared to patients with a negative CRM, a positive margin due to tumour was associated with a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (43.7% versus 8.8%, p = 0.001) and distant metastases (62% versus 13.6%, p = 0.001) with poorer 5-year cancer-specific survival (32% versus 87.8%, p = 0.001). Although patients with margin positivity due to lymph nodes had a higher rate of distant metastases (41.3% versus 13.6%, p = 0.004) and poorer 5-year cancer-specific survival (59.3% versus 87.8%, p = 0.038), the rate of local recurrence was comparable to that of patients with negative margins (8.3% versus 8.8%, p = 0.694).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the nature of CRM involvement may be important in determining prognosis in rectal cancer. Local recurrence is higher only when there is tumour present at the margin. Lymph node involvement of the margin confers similar risk of local recurrence to patients with CRM-negative, node-positive disease. These results need further evaluation in multicentre, prospective studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parfitt JR, Driman DK (2007) The total mesorectal excision specimen for rectal cancer: a review of its pathological assessment. J Clin Pathol 60(8):849–855CrossRefPubMed Parfitt JR, Driman DK (2007) The total mesorectal excision specimen for rectal cancer: a review of its pathological assessment. J Clin Pathol 60(8):849–855CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996–999CrossRefPubMed Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2(8514):996–999CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP et al (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 235(4):449–457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP et al (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 235(4):449–457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Bernstein TE, Endreseth BH, Romundstad P, Wibe A, Group NCC (2009) Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(11):1348–1357CrossRefPubMed Bernstein TE, Endreseth BH, Romundstad P, Wibe A, Group NCC (2009) Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(11):1348–1357CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482CrossRefPubMed Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(17):1731–1740CrossRefPubMed Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(17):1731–1740CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EM, Putter H, Wiggers T et al (2011) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 12(6):575–582CrossRefPubMed van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EM, Putter H, Wiggers T et al (2011) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 12(6):575–582CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, Sains PS, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, Ireland AoCoGBa (2007) Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum 50(1):29–36CrossRefPubMed Tilney HS, Tekkis PP, Sains PS, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, Ireland AoCoGBa (2007) Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum 50(1):29–36CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Youssef H, Collantes EC, Rashid SH, Wong LS, Baragwanath P (2009) Rectal cancer: involved circumferential resection margin—a root cause analysis. Colorectal Dis 11(5):470–474CrossRefPubMed Youssef H, Collantes EC, Rashid SH, Wong LS, Baragwanath P (2009) Rectal cancer: involved circumferential resection margin—a root cause analysis. Colorectal Dis 11(5):470–474CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rickles AS, Dietz DW, Chang GJ, Wexner SD, Berho ME, Remzi FH et al (2015) High rate of positive circumferential resection margins following rectal cancer surgery: a call to action. Ann Surg 262(6):891–898CrossRefPubMed Rickles AS, Dietz DW, Chang GJ, Wexner SD, Berho ME, Remzi FH et al (2015) High rate of positive circumferential resection margins following rectal cancer surgery: a call to action. Ann Surg 262(6):891–898CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hall NR, Finan PJ, al-Jaberi T, Tsang CS, Brown SR, Dixon MF et al (1998) Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent. Predictor of survival but not local recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 41(8):979–983CrossRefPubMed Hall NR, Finan PJ, al-Jaberi T, Tsang CS, Brown SR, Dixon MF et al (1998) Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent. Predictor of survival but not local recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 41(8):979–983CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nikberg M, Kindler C, Chabok A, Letocha H, Shetye J, Smedh K (2015) Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 58(3):275–282CrossRefPubMed Nikberg M, Kindler C, Chabok A, Letocha H, Shetye J, Smedh K (2015) Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 58(3):275–282CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tilly C, Lefevre JH, Svrcek M, Shields C, Flejou JF, Tiret E, Parc Y (2014) R1 rectal resection: look up and don’t look down. Ann Surg 260(5):794–799CrossRefPubMed Tilly C, Lefevre JH, Svrcek M, Shields C, Flejou JF, Tiret E, Parc Y (2014) R1 rectal resection: look up and don’t look down. Ann Surg 260(5):794–799CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, Committee PR et al (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26(3):350–357CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, Committee PR et al (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26(3):350–357CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Langman G, Patel A, Bowley DM (2015) Size and distribution of lymph nodes in rectal cancer resection specimens. Dis Colon Rectum 58(4):406–414CrossRefPubMed Langman G, Patel A, Bowley DM (2015) Size and distribution of lymph nodes in rectal cancer resection specimens. Dis Colon Rectum 58(4):406–414CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344(8924):707–711CrossRefPubMed Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344(8924):707–711CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ et al (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer–implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45(7):857–866CrossRefPubMed Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ et al (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer–implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45(7):857–866CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Søreide O et al (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47(1):48–58CrossRefPubMed Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Søreide O et al (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47(1):48–58CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD et al (2005) Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 7(4):369–374CrossRefPubMed Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD et al (2005) Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 7(4):369–374CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26(2):303–312CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26(2):303–312CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Phang PT, McGahan CE, McGregor G, MacFarlane JK, Brown CJ, Raval MJ et al (2010) Effects of change in rectal cancer management on outcomes in British Columbia. Can J Surg 53(4):225–231PubMedPubMedCentral Phang PT, McGahan CE, McGregor G, MacFarlane JK, Brown CJ, Raval MJ et al (2010) Effects of change in rectal cancer management on outcomes in British Columbia. Can J Surg 53(4):225–231PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Al-Sukhni E, Attwood K, Gabriel E, Nurkin SJ (2016) Predictors of circumferential resection margin involvement in surgically resected rectal cancer: a retrospective review of 23,464 patients in the US National Cancer Database. Int J Surg 28:112–117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al-Sukhni E, Attwood K, Gabriel E, Nurkin SJ (2016) Predictors of circumferential resection margin involvement in surgically resected rectal cancer: a retrospective review of 23,464 patients in the US National Cancer Database. Int J Surg 28:112–117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Shihab OC, Quirke P, Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Brown G (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging-detected lymph nodes close to the mesorectal fascia are rarely a cause of margin involvement after total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 97(9):1431–1436CrossRefPubMed Shihab OC, Quirke P, Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Brown G (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging-detected lymph nodes close to the mesorectal fascia are rarely a cause of margin involvement after total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 97(9):1431–1436CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
Authors
A. Patel
N. Green
P. Sarmah
G. Langman
K. Chandrakumaran
H. Youssef
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01947-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Techniques in Coloproctology 2/2019 Go to the issue