Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Author's Reply

Treatment of spondylodiscitis after rectopexy: surgery is always required—Fauheron JL, Trilling B

Author: A. Pasquer

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

We read with interest the article by Faucheron and Trilling [1]. We would like to comment on some of the questions raised:
(1)
The surgeon who operated the patient was an expert urologist from another surgical team. As stated by the authors, spondylodiscitis after rectopexy is very rare in experienced hands. This case was the only one in our extended cohort including 731 consecutive Orr-Loygue procedures that were performed by the same surgeon.
 
(2)
We agree with the fact that multimodal diagnostic imaging was excessive. Indeed, as shown in our figure, the computed tomography scan made possible the diagnosis [2]. The bone scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging did not delay antibiotic treatment as we started it immediately.
 
(3)
Laparoscopy could have been attempted, but in a context of uncontrolled sepsis, an open approach was preferred used because it permitted more rapid intervention.
 
(4)
We agree that the rectal perforation was too large and the local peritonitis too severe for conservative treatment.
 
Literature
Metadata
Title
Treatment of spondylodiscitis after rectopexy: surgery is always required—Fauheron JL, Trilling B
Author
A. Pasquer
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1624-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Techniques in Coloproctology 5/2017 Go to the issue