Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Original Article

Prospective analysis of the sealing ability of the ENSEAL® G2 Articulating Tissue Sealer and transector on human mesenteric vessels in colorectal surgery

Authors: B. Balachandran, G. Melich, T. Mustafa, S. J. Marecik, L. M. Prasad, M. Gonzalez, S. Sulo, F. Dabbous, J. J. Park

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The sealing and transection of mesenteric vessels is a crucial step in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. We examined the sealing quality of the ENSEAL® G2 Articulating Tissue Sealer in three different articulations in mesenteric vessels.

Methods

This was a prospective experimental study within a tertiary healthcare center, and 30 patients were recruited. Burst pressures for each specimen were measured as the primary outcome. Ten specimens at each of the three articulations were also histologically assessed for the quality of seal.

Results

We evaluated 54 sets of specimens from 30 patients for bursting pressure, all of which were harvested and sealed in the operating room. No statistical difference was seen in burst pressures from seals recorded at no angulation, half-maximal angulation, or maximal angulation (1604, 1507, 1478 mmHg; p = 0.07). Histological analysis showed no statistical differences in the average vessel diameter (p = 0.57), lateral extent of thermal injury (p = 0.48), degree of vascular sclerosis, or the integrity of seal at the three articulations. No cases of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding were observed in any of the patients. Five (16.7%) of the ENSEAL® devices developed breaks in the black, heat-shrink, polyethylene covering as a result of repeated articulation and disarticulation. Electrical arcing did not appear to have occurred as a result of the break, although this was not formally examined.

Conclusions

The maximum sustainable pressure in mesenteric vessels sealed with a bipolar electrothermal device is supraphysiological, and consequently, the device can be safely used at various articulations to seal vessels during colorectal surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bibi S, Coralic J, Velchuru V et al (2014) A prospective study of in vivo and ex vivo sealing of the human inferior mesenteric artery using an electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing device. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:471–474CrossRefPubMed Bibi S, Coralic J, Velchuru V et al (2014) A prospective study of in vivo and ex vivo sealing of the human inferior mesenteric artery using an electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing device. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:471–474CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J et al (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 169:697–700CrossRefPubMed Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J et al (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 169:697–700CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Guerrieri M, Sanctis A, Baldarelli M et al (2008) Electrothermal bipolar energy-based device in laparoscopic right colectomy: our experience. Minerva Chir 63:455–460PubMed Guerrieri M, Sanctis A, Baldarelli M et al (2008) Electrothermal bipolar energy-based device in laparoscopic right colectomy: our experience. Minerva Chir 63:455–460PubMed
4.
go back to reference Noble EJ, Smart NJ, Challand C, Sleigh K, Oriolowo A, Hosie KB (2011) Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing and thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices. Br J Surg 98:797–800CrossRefPubMed Noble EJ, Smart NJ, Challand C, Sleigh K, Oriolowo A, Hosie KB (2011) Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing and thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices. Br J Surg 98:797–800CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Holubkov R, Schoetz DJ (2006) Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:263–269CrossRefPubMed Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Holubkov R, Schoetz DJ (2006) Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:263–269CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ng P, Pondos Y (2009) Vision energy; ensure, enable, EnSeal. A new technology for gastrointestinal surgery. Presented at the 2009 Scientific Session of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Phoenix, AZ, 22–25 April 2009 Ng P, Pondos Y (2009) Vision energy; ensure, enable, EnSeal. A new technology for gastrointestinal surgery. Presented at the 2009 Scientific Session of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Phoenix, AZ, 22–25 April 2009
8.
go back to reference Person B, Vivas DA, Ruiz D, Talcott M, Coad JE, Wexner SD (2008) Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: a porcine model. Surg Endosc 22:534–538CrossRefPubMed Person B, Vivas DA, Ruiz D, Talcott M, Coad JE, Wexner SD (2008) Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: a porcine model. Surg Endosc 22:534–538CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rothmund R, Kraemer B, Neis F et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of the novel electrosurgical vessel sealing and cutting instrument BiCision(R). Surg Endosc 26:3334–3343CrossRefPubMed Rothmund R, Kraemer B, Neis F et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of the novel electrosurgical vessel sealing and cutting instrument BiCision(R). Surg Endosc 26:3334–3343CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Newcomb WL, Hope WW, Schmelzer TM et al (2009) Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices. Surg Endosc 23:90–96CrossRefPubMed Newcomb WL, Hope WW, Schmelzer TM et al (2009) Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices. Surg Endosc 23:90–96CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gonzalez A, Murcia CH, Romero R et al (2015) A multicenter study of initial experience with single-incision robotic cholecystectomies (SIRC) demonstrating a high success rate in 465 cases. Surg Endosc 30:2951–2960CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez A, Murcia CH, Romero R et al (2015) A multicenter study of initial experience with single-incision robotic cholecystectomies (SIRC) demonstrating a high success rate in 465 cases. Surg Endosc 30:2951–2960CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:377–380CrossRefPubMed Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:377–380CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wallwiener CW, Rajab TK, Zubke W et al (2008) Thermal conduction, compression, and electrical current—an evaluation of major parameters of electrosurgical vessel sealing in a porcine in vitro model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:605–610CrossRefPubMed Wallwiener CW, Rajab TK, Zubke W et al (2008) Thermal conduction, compression, and electrical current—an evaluation of major parameters of electrosurgical vessel sealing in a porcine in vitro model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:605–610CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lamberton GR, Hsi RS, Jin DH, Lindler TU, Jellison FC, Baldwin DD (2008) Prospective comparison of four laparoscopic vessel ligation devices. J Endourol 22:2307–2312CrossRefPubMed Lamberton GR, Hsi RS, Jin DH, Lindler TU, Jellison FC, Baldwin DD (2008) Prospective comparison of four laparoscopic vessel ligation devices. J Endourol 22:2307–2312CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Box GN, Lee HJ, Abraham JB et al (2009) Comparative study of in vivo lymphatic sealing capability of the porcine thoracic duct using laparoscopic dissection devices. J Urol 181:387–391CrossRefPubMed Box GN, Lee HJ, Abraham JB et al (2009) Comparative study of in vivo lymphatic sealing capability of the porcine thoracic duct using laparoscopic dissection devices. J Urol 181:387–391CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Overhaus M, Schaefer N, Walgenbach K, Hirner A, Szyrach MN, Tolba RH (2012) Efficiency and safety of bipolar vessel and tissue sealing in visceral surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 21:396–401CrossRefPubMed Overhaus M, Schaefer N, Walgenbach K, Hirner A, Szyrach MN, Tolba RH (2012) Efficiency and safety of bipolar vessel and tissue sealing in visceral surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 21:396–401CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prospective analysis of the sealing ability of the ENSEAL® G2 Articulating Tissue Sealer and transector on human mesenteric vessels in colorectal surgery
Authors
B. Balachandran
G. Melich
T. Mustafa
S. J. Marecik
L. M. Prasad
M. Gonzalez
S. Sulo
F. Dabbous
J. J. Park
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1584-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Techniques in Coloproctology 2/2017 Go to the issue