Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Article

A simple web-based risk calculator (www.anastomoticleak.com) is superior to the surgeon’s estimate of anastomotic leak after colon cancer resection

Authors: T. Sammour, M. Lewis, M. L. Thomas, M. J. Lawrence, A. Hunter, J. W. Moore

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leak can be a devastating complication, and early prediction is difficult. The aim of this study is to prospectively validate a simple anastomotic leak risk calculator and compare its predictive value with the estimate of the primary operating surgeon.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency colon cancer surgery with a primary anastomosis over a 1-year period were prospectively included. A recently published anastomotic leak risk nomogram was converted to an online calculator (www.​anastomoticleak.​com). The calculator-derived risk of anastomotic leak and the risk estimated by the primary operating surgeon were recorded at the completion of surgery. The primary outcome was anastomotic leak within 90 days as defined by previously published criteria. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUROC) was performed for both risk estimates.

Results

A total of 105 patients were screened for inclusion during the study period, of whom 83 met the inclusion criteria. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 9.6%. The anastomotic leak calculator was highly predictive of anastomotic leak (AUROC 0.84, P = 0.002), whereas the surgeon estimate was not predictive (AUROC 0.40, P = 0.243).

Conclusions

A simple anastomotic leak risk calculator is significantly better at predicting anastomotic leak than the estimate of the primary surgeon. Further external validation on a larger data set is required.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nachiappan S, Askari A, Malietzis G et al (2015) The impact of anastomotic leak and its treatment on cancer recurrence and survival following elective colorectal cancer resection. World J Surg 39:1052–1058CrossRefPubMed Nachiappan S, Askari A, Malietzis G et al (2015) The impact of anastomotic leak and its treatment on cancer recurrence and survival following elective colorectal cancer resection. World J Surg 39:1052–1058CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR et al (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338CrossRefPubMed Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR et al (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nachiappan S, Faiz O (2015) Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer. Ann Surg 262:e111CrossRefPubMed Nachiappan S, Faiz O (2015) Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer. Ann Surg 262:e111CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432 (discussion 432) CrossRefPubMed Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432 (discussion 432) CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208:269–278CrossRefPubMed Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208:269–278CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ziegler MA, Catto JA, Riggs TW, Gates ER, Grodsky MB, Wasvary HJ (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and mortality in diabetic patients undergoing colectomy: analysis from a statewide surgical quality collaborative. Arch Surg 147:600–605CrossRefPubMed Ziegler MA, Catto JA, Riggs TW, Gates ER, Grodsky MB, Wasvary HJ (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and mortality in diabetic patients undergoing colectomy: analysis from a statewide surgical quality collaborative. Arch Surg 147:600–605CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodriguez JL et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330CrossRefPubMed Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodriguez JL et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Buzby GP, Knox LS, Crosby LO et al (1988) Study protocol: a randomized clinical trial of total parenteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 47(2 Suppl):366–381PubMed Buzby GP, Knox LS, Crosby LO et al (1988) Study protocol: a randomized clinical trial of total parenteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 47(2 Suppl):366–381PubMed
9.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Crebbin W, Beasley SW, Watters DA (2013) Clinical decision making: how surgeons do it. ANZ J Surg 83:422–428CrossRefPubMed Crebbin W, Beasley SW, Watters DA (2013) Clinical decision making: how surgeons do it. ANZ J Surg 83:422–428CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Dindo D (2007) Surgeon’s intuition: is it enough to assess patients’ surgical risk? World J Surg 31:1909–1911CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Dindo D (2007) Surgeon’s intuition: is it enough to assess patients’ surgical risk? World J Surg 31:1909–1911CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pauley K, Flin R, Yule S, Youngson G (2011) Surgeons’ intraoperative decision making and risk management. Am J Surg 202:375–381CrossRefPubMed Pauley K, Flin R, Yule S, Youngson G (2011) Surgeons’ intraoperative decision making and risk management. Am J Surg 202:375–381CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sevdalis N, Jacklin R (2008) Opening the “black box” of surgeons’ risk estimation: from intuition to quantitative modeling. World J Surg 32:324–325 (author reply 326–327) CrossRefPubMed Sevdalis N, Jacklin R (2008) Opening the “black box” of surgeons’ risk estimation: from intuition to quantitative modeling. World J Surg 32:324–325 (author reply 326–327) CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Woodfield JC, Pettigrew RA, Plank LD, Landmann M, van Rij AM (2007) Accuracy of the surgeons’ clinical prediction of perioperative complications using a visual analog scale. World J Surg 31:1912–1920CrossRefPubMed Woodfield JC, Pettigrew RA, Plank LD, Landmann M, van Rij AM (2007) Accuracy of the surgeons’ clinical prediction of perioperative complications using a visual analog scale. World J Surg 31:1912–1920CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Farges O, Vibert E, Cosse C et al (2014) “Surgeons’ intuition” versus “prognostic models”: predicting the risk of liver resections. Ann Surg 260:923–928 (discussion 928–930) CrossRefPubMed Farges O, Vibert E, Cosse C et al (2014) “Surgeons’ intuition” versus “prognostic models”: predicting the risk of liver resections. Ann Surg 260:923–928 (discussion 928–930) CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Erb L, Hyman NH, Osler T (2014) Abnormal vital signs are common after bowel resection and do not predict anastomotic leak. J Am Coll Surg 218:1195–1199CrossRefPubMed Erb L, Hyman NH, Osler T (2014) Abnormal vital signs are common after bowel resection and do not predict anastomotic leak. J Am Coll Surg 218:1195–1199CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 6:14–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 6:14–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Tevis SE, Carchman EH, Foley EF, Heise CP, Harms BA, Kennedy GD (2015) Does anastomotic leak contribute to high failure-to-rescue rates? Ann Surg 263:1148–1151CrossRef Tevis SE, Carchman EH, Foley EF, Heise CP, Harms BA, Kennedy GD (2015) Does anastomotic leak contribute to high failure-to-rescue rates? Ann Surg 263:1148–1151CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A simple web-based risk calculator (www.anastomoticleak.com) is superior to the surgeon’s estimate of anastomotic leak after colon cancer resection
Authors
T. Sammour
M. Lewis
M. L. Thomas
M. J. Lawrence
A. Hunter
J. W. Moore
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1567-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2017 Go to the issue