Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Article

Assessment of a novel, full-thickness incisional biopsy model to restage rectal tumours after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: results of an ex vivo pilot study

Authors: F. M. Smith, H. Wiland, A. Mace, R. K. Pai, M. F. Kalady

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is currently no reliable means to restage rectal cancers after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Recent histological evidence shows that the epicentre for residual cancer cells is focussed directly underneath any residual mucosal abnormality (RMA). This proof-of-concept study aimed to determine the utility of a novel, minimally invasive method of incisional biopsy as a restaging tool. A secondary aim was to compare its performance to clinical response assessment.

Methods

After surgical resection, 0.5 × 0.5 cm, full-thickness incisional biopsy was performed in 15 rectal cancers. Of these, 13 had RMA and 2 had mucosal cCR but a palpable intramural abnormality. In all patients, a full-thickness incisional biopsy was taken through the centre of these areas. The ypT stage of the incisional biopsy and the final total specimen were compared. Complete mucosal clinical response was deemed to have occurred when either no residual tumour or only a flat mucosal scar remained.

Results

Incisional biopsy correctly identified all patients that had been downstaged to ypT0; however, it also falsely identified 5 of 10 patients (50 %) with yp residual disease as ypT0. Overall performance of incisional biopsy to detect residual cancer was 50 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity, 100 % PPV, and 50 % NPV with an accuracy of 66 %. A complete mucosal clinical response occurred in only one of five patients downstaged to ypT0 (20 % sensitive). It also occurred in one patient, which was ultimately staged as ypT3.

Conclusion

This prospective data demonstrates that incisional biopsy is not suitable as a stand-alone method to restage rectal cancer after CRT. Alternate or complementary means of restaging are needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith FM, Waldron D, Winter DC (2010) Rectum-conserving surgery in the era of chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 97:1752–1764CrossRefPubMed Smith FM, Waldron D, Winter DC (2010) Rectum-conserving surgery in the era of chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 97:1752–1764CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kalady MF, de Campos-Lobato LF, Stocchi L et al (2009) Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 250:582–589PubMed Kalady MF, de Campos-Lobato LF, Stocchi L et al (2009) Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 250:582–589PubMed
3.
go back to reference Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Wynn G, Marks J, Kessler H, Gama-Rodrigues J (2010) Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1692–1698CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Wynn G, Marks J, Kessler H, Gama-Rodrigues J (2010) Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1692–1698CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Smith FM, Chang KH, Sheahan K, Hyland J, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2012) The surgical significance of residual mucosal abnormalities in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 99:993–1001CrossRefPubMed Smith FM, Chang KH, Sheahan K, Hyland J, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2012) The surgical significance of residual mucosal abnormalities in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 99:993–1001CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF (2014) Clinical criteria underestimate complete pathological response in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 57:311–315CrossRefPubMed Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF (2014) Clinical criteria underestimate complete pathological response in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 57:311–315CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF (2014) Depth and lateral spread of microscopic residual rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: implications for treatment decisions. Colorectal Dis 16:610–615CrossRefPubMed Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF (2014) Depth and lateral spread of microscopic residual rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: implications for treatment decisions. Colorectal Dis 16:610–615CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Pereira GV et al (2012) Role of biopsies in patients with residual rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation after downsizing: Can they rule out persisting cancer? Colorectal Dis 14:714–720CrossRefPubMed Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Pereira GV et al (2012) Role of biopsies in patients with residual rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation after downsizing: Can they rule out persisting cancer? Colorectal Dis 14:714–720CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Meterissian S, Skibber J, Rich T et al (1994) Patterns of residual disease after preoperative chemoradiation in ultrasound T3 rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1:111–116CrossRefPubMed Meterissian S, Skibber J, Rich T et al (1994) Patterns of residual disease after preoperative chemoradiation in ultrasound T3 rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1:111–116CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton PA et al (2008) Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1182–1193PubMed Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton PA et al (2008) Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1182–1193PubMed
10.
go back to reference Smith JD, Ruby JA, Goodman KA et al (2012) Nonoperative management of rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg 256:965–972CrossRefPubMed Smith JD, Ruby JA, Goodman KA et al (2012) Nonoperative management of rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg 256:965–972CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240:711–717PubMedCentralPubMed Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240:711–717PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM et al (2011) Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4633–4640CrossRefPubMed Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM et al (2011) Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4633–4640CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Lynn PB et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for residual rectal cancer (ypT0-2) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: another word of caution. Dis Colon Rectum 56:6–13CrossRefPubMed Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Lynn PB et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for residual rectal cancer (ypT0-2) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: another word of caution. Dis Colon Rectum 56:6–13CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Maretto I, Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S et al (2007) The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:455–461CrossRefPubMed Maretto I, Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S et al (2007) The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:455–461CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Perez RO (2014) Pitfalls of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:63–69CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Perez RO (2014) Pitfalls of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:63–69CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hayden DM, Jakate S, Pinzon MC et al (2012) Tumor scatter after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Are we dealing with an invisible margin? Dis Colon Rectum 55:1206–1212CrossRefPubMed Hayden DM, Jakate S, Pinzon MC et al (2012) Tumor scatter after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Are we dealing with an invisible margin? Dis Colon Rectum 55:1206–1212CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617–6623CrossRefPubMed Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617–6623CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of a novel, full-thickness incisional biopsy model to restage rectal tumours after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: results of an ex vivo pilot study
Authors
F. M. Smith
H. Wiland
A. Mace
R. K. Pai
M. F. Kalady
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1272-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2015 Go to the issue