Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Techniques in Coloproctology
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

One-third of patients fail to return to work 1 year after surgery for colorectal cancer

Authors: A. Bhalla, J. P. Williams, N. G. Hurst, W. J. Speake, G. M. Tierney, S. Tou, J. N. Lund

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Achieving full recovery after colorectal cancer surgery means a return to normal physical and psychological health and to a normal social life. Recovery data focusses on time to discharge rather than longer term functionality including return to work (RTW). We aim to assess return to normal holistic function at 1 year after colorectal cancer surgery.

Method

Questionnaires were created and dispatched to 204 patients who had undergone surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer, in 2011–2012, in a single teaching hospital.

Results

Response rate was 75 % (153/204), 82 % (129/157) for open surgery (OS) and 51 % (24/47) for laparoscopic surgery (LS). Median age was 68 (48–91) years for OS and 65 (36–84) for LS. Eighty-four per cent of patients felt ‘ready’ and 95 % had adequate pain control upon discharge (no difference between groups). LS reported earlier ‘return to full fitness’ (1–3 months) than OS (>6 months; Mann–Whitney U, p < 0.05). Recovery from LS was ‘better than expected’ compared to OS ‘worse than expected’ (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05). Forty-nine patients were employed preoperatively and 61 % (n = 30) returned to work. RTW was more frequent after LS (Chi-square test, p < 0.05). Length of time to RTW was significantly less after LS [44 (6–84) days] than OS [71 (14–252) days] (t test, p < 0.05). Levels of self-employment were equal between groups.

Conclusions

One-third of patients failed to RTW at 1 year post-surgery. Patients having LS returned to full fitness faster, felt recovery was shorter and returned to work earlier than OS. We must invest more in managing expectations and provide better post-discharge support to improve RTW.
Literature
1.
Schwenk W, Kehlet H (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1653–1654PubMedCrossRef
2.
Allvin R, Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U (2007) Postoperative recovery: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 57:552–558PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Carlsen K, Harling H, Pedersen J, Christensen KB, Osler M (2013) The transition between work, sickness absence and pension in a cohort of Danish colorectal cancer survivors. BMJ Open 3
5.
6.
Frederiksen BL, Osler M, Harling H, Ladelund S, Jorgensen T (2009) The impact of socioeconomic factors on 30-day mortality following elective colorectal cancer surgery: a nationwide study. Eur J Cancer 45:1248–1256PubMedCrossRef
7.
Cavalli-Bjorkman N, Lambe M, Eaker S, Sandin F, Glimelius B (2011) Differences according to educational level in the management and survival of colorectal cancer in Sweden. Eur J Cancer 47:1398–1406PubMedCrossRef
8.
Gordon L, Lynch BM, Newman B (2008) Transitions in work participation after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A N Z J Pub Health 32:569–574CrossRef
9.
van den Brink M, van den Hout WB, Kievit J et al (2005) The impact of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer on paid and unpaid labor. Dis Colon 48:1875–1882CrossRef
10.
Sanchez KM, Richardson JL, Mason HR (2004) The return to work experiences of colorectal cancer survivors. AAOHN J 52:500–510PubMed
11.
12.
Taskila T, Martikainen R, Hietanen P, Lindbohm ML (2007) Comparative study of work ability between cancer survivors and their referents. Eur J Cancer 43:914–920PubMedCrossRef
13.
Earle CC, Chretien Y, Morris C et al (2010) Employment among survivors of lung cancer and colorectal cancer. J Clin Onc 28:1700–1705CrossRef
14.
Amir Z, Moran T, Walsh L, Iddenden R, Luker K (2007) Return to paid work after cancer: a British experience. J Cancer Surviv 1:129–136PubMedCrossRef
15.
Carlsen K, Dalton SO, Diderichsen F, Johansen C (2008) Risk for unemployment of cancer survivors: a Danish cohort study. Eur J Cancer 44:1866–1874PubMedCrossRef
16.
Gordon LG, Lynch BM, Beesley VL et al (2011) The working after cancer study (WACS): a population-based study of middle-aged workers diagnosed with colorectal cancer and their return to work experiences. BMC Pub Health 11:604CrossRef
17.
Mols F, Thong MS, Vreugdenhil G, van de Poll-Franse LV (2009) Long-term cancer survivors experience work changes after diagnosis: results of a population-based study. Psychooncology 18:1252–1260PubMedCrossRef
18.
Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Chang GJ, Skibber JM (2007) Barriers to rehabilitation of colorectal cancer patients. J Surg Onc 95:400–408CrossRef
19.
20.
Bains M, Yarker J, Amir Z, Wynn P, Munir F (2012) Helping cancer survivors return to work: what providers tell us about the challenges in assisting cancer patients with work questions. J Occup Rehab 22:71–77CrossRef
21.
Palmer KT, Coc RAF, Brown I (2007) Fitness for work: the medical aspects. Oxford University Press, Oxford
22.
Johnson MVC (1993) Benefits of psychological preparation for surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med 15:11
Metadata
Title
One-third of patients fail to return to work 1 year after surgery for colorectal cancer
Authors
A. Bhalla
J. P. Williams
N. G. Hurst
W. J. Speake
G. M. Tierney
S. Tou
J. N. Lund
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1232-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 12/2014 Go to the issue

Erratum

Erratum to: Quality of patient information on the internet for the treatment of anal fistula and anal fissure

Correspondence

Quality of patient information on the internet for the treatment of anal fistula and anal fissure

Correspondence

Surgical site events in colorectal surgery: prevention is better than cure

Review

Results of sacral nerve neuromodulation for double incontinence in adults

Web Review

Second Genoa meeting “Recent Advances on Colorectal Polyps”

Trick of the Trade

Prevention of recurrent small bowel obstruction resulting from pelvic adhesions in patients who have previously undergone abdominoperineal excision of the rectum