Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Technical Note

Surgery for complex perineal fistula following rectal cancer treatment using biological mesh combined with gluteal perforator flap

Authors: G. D. Musters, O. Lapid, W. A. Bemelman, P. J. Tanis

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Three patients with complex perineal fistula after extensive pelvic surgery and radiotherapy underwent surgical treatment combining a biological mesh for pelvic floor reconstruction and a unilateral superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap for filling of the perineal defect. All patients had both fecal and urinary diversion. Two fistulas originated from the small bowel, necessitating parenteral feeding, and one from the bladder. Symptoms included severe sacral pain and skin maceration. After laparotomy with complete debridement of the pelvic cavity, the pelvic floor was reconstructed by stitching a biological mesh at the level of the pelvic outlet. Subsequently, patients were turned to prone position, and perineal reconstruction was completed by rotating a SGAP flap into the defect between the biomesh and the perineal skin. Operating time ranged from 10 to 12.5 h, and hospital stay lasted from 9 to 23 days. The postoperative course was uneventful in all three patients. Reconstruction of large pelvic defects with a combination of biological mesh and SGAP flap is a viable alternative to a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap and may be preferable after extensive pelvic surgery with ostomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chadwick MA, Vieten D, Pettitt E, Dixon AR, Roe AM (2006) Short course preoperative radiotherapy is the single most important risk factor for perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 8:756–761PubMedCrossRef Chadwick MA, Vieten D, Pettitt E, Dixon AR, Roe AM (2006) Short course preoperative radiotherapy is the single most important risk factor for perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 8:756–761PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hultman CS, Sherrill MA, Halvorson EG et al (2010) Utility of the omentum in pelvic floor reconstruction following resection of anorectal malignancy: patient selection, technical caveats, and clinical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 64:559–562PubMed Hultman CS, Sherrill MA, Halvorson EG et al (2010) Utility of the omentum in pelvic floor reconstruction following resection of anorectal malignancy: patient selection, technical caveats, and clinical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 64:559–562PubMed
3.
go back to reference Butler CE, Gundeslioglu AO, Rodriguez-Bigas MA (2008) Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. J Am Coll Surg 206:694–703PubMedCrossRef Butler CE, Gundeslioglu AO, Rodriguez-Bigas MA (2008) Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. J Am Coll Surg 206:694–703PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kerneis S et al (2009) Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg 250:707–711PubMedCrossRef Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kerneis S et al (2009) Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg 250:707–711PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE (1976) Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:176–183PubMedCrossRef McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE (1976) Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:176–183PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nelson RA, Butler CE (2009) Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:175–183PubMedCrossRef Nelson RA, Butler CE (2009) Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:175–183PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ng RW, Chan JY, Mok V, Li GK (2008) Clinical use of a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:158–164PubMedCrossRef Ng RW, Chan JY, Mok V, Li GK (2008) Clinical use of a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:158–164PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Unal C, Yirmibesoglu OA, Ozdemir J, Hasdemir M (2011) Superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps in reconstruction of gluteal and perianal/perineal hidradenitis suppurativa lesions. Microsurgery 31:539–544PubMedCrossRef Unal C, Yirmibesoglu OA, Ozdemir J, Hasdemir M (2011) Superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps in reconstruction of gluteal and perianal/perineal hidradenitis suppurativa lesions. Microsurgery 31:539–544PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Christensen HK, Nerstrom P, Tei T, Laurberg S (2011) Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:711–717PubMedCrossRef Christensen HK, Nerstrom P, Tei T, Laurberg S (2011) Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:711–717PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgery for complex perineal fistula following rectal cancer treatment using biological mesh combined with gluteal perforator flap
Authors
G. D. Musters
O. Lapid
W. A. Bemelman
P. J. Tanis
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1163-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 10/2014 Go to the issue