Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Editorial

The evidence base for rectal prolapse surgery: is resection rectopexy worth the risk?

Author: S. Brown

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

The optimal operation for rectal prolapse is unclear. Various options exist. Broadly, one can carry out the operation via a perineal or abdominal approach. If perineal, should it be a Delormes or rectosigmoidectomy combined with a levatorplasty or not? If abdominal, should it be open or laparoscopic and should the rectum be simply mobilised or fixed? If fixed, what with and where from and to? Should the lateral ligaments be divided or preserved and should the redundant sigmoid be resected? …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ et al (2013) PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 15:858–868PubMedCrossRef Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ et al (2013) PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 15:858–868PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MRB (1994) Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perianal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81:302–304PubMedCrossRef Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MRB (1994) Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perianal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81:302–304PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wijffels N, Cunnigham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsay I (2011) Laparoscopic anterior rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal approach obsolete? Colorectal Dis 13:561–566PubMedCrossRef Wijffels N, Cunnigham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsay I (2011) Laparoscopic anterior rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal approach obsolete? Colorectal Dis 13:561–566PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Karas JR, Uranues S, Altomare DF et al (2011) No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilisation for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:29–34PubMedCrossRef Karas JR, Uranues S, Altomare DF et al (2011) No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilisation for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:29–34PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD001758 Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD001758
6.
go back to reference Laubert T, Kleemann M, Roblick UJ et al (2013) Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with resection rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 17:307–314PubMedCrossRef Laubert T, Kleemann M, Roblick UJ et al (2013) Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with resection rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 17:307–314PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Varma JS (1992) Autonomic influences on colorectal motility and pelvic surgery. World J Surg 16:811–919PubMedCrossRef Varma JS (1992) Autonomic influences on colorectal motility and pelvic surgery. World J Surg 16:811–919PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rothenhoefer S, Herrle F, Herold A et al (2012) DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing two standardized approaches in rectal prolapse—Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy. Trials 13:155PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Rothenhoefer S, Herrle F, Herold A et al (2012) DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing two standardized approaches in rectal prolapse—Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy. Trials 13:155PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Magruder JT, Efron JE, Wick EC, Gearhart SL (2013) Laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse to reduce surgical site infections and length of stay. World J Surg 37:1110–1114PubMedCrossRef Magruder JT, Efron JE, Wick EC, Gearhart SL (2013) Laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse to reduce surgical site infections and length of stay. World J Surg 37:1110–1114PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bisset IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–514PubMedCrossRef Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bisset IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–514PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The evidence base for rectal prolapse surgery: is resection rectopexy worth the risk?
Author
S. Brown
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1077-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2014 Go to the issue