Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Efficacy of docetaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate

Authors: Akiyuki Yamamoto, Masashi Kato, Hirotaka Matsui, Ryo Ishida, Tohru Kimura, Yasuhito Funahashi, Naoto Sassa, Yoshihisa Matsukawa, Osamu Kamihira, Ryohei Hattori, Momokazu Gotoh, Toyonori Tsuzuki

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of docetaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P).

Patients and methods

We retrospectively identified 79 CRPC patients with distant metastasis at initial diagnosis from June 2002 to January 2014. All patients received initial androgen deprivation therapy and 46 received docetaxel chemotherapy after progressing to CRPC. The primary outcome of interest was cancer-specific survival (CSS) from the time of CRPC diagnosis. The Cox regression model was used to confirm whether IDC-P and docetaxel would act as independent factors for prognosis.

Results

IDC-P was found in 62 of 79 patients. The median CSS in the IDC-P-present group was 18.2 versus 45.6 months in the IDC-P-absent group (HR 2.67; 95% CI 1.18 to 6.06; P = 0.019). Docetaxel was administered to 36 patients with IDC-P and 10 patients without IDC-P, with a median CSS of 20.5 versus 53.2 months, respectively (HR 2.98; 95% CI 1.02 to 8.64; P = 0.044). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of IDC-P and docetaxel were independent prognostic factors for CSS (P = 0.026 and 0.005, respectively) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.029 and 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

The presence of IDC-P is an independent prognostic factor in CRPC patients with distant metastases and IDC-P in needle biopsies at the time of initial diagnosis. Docetaxel may prolong CSS and OS in CRPC patients with distant metastases and IDC-P in needle biopsies at the time of initial diagnosis.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference McNeal JE, Yemoto CE (1996) Spread of adenocarcinoma within prostatic ducts and acini: morphologic and clinical correlations. Am J Surg Pathol 20(7):802–814CrossRefPubMed McNeal JE, Yemoto CE (1996) Spread of adenocarcinoma within prostatic ducts and acini: morphologic and clinical correlations. Am J Surg Pathol 20(7):802–814CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Guo CC, Epstein JI (2006) Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: histologic features and clinical significance. Mod Pathol 19:1528–1535CrossRefPubMed Guo CC, Epstein JI (2006) Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: histologic features and clinical significance. Mod Pathol 19:1528–1535CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kimura K, Tsuzuki T, Kato M et al (2014) Prognostic value of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens. Prostate 74:680–687CrossRefPubMed Kimura K, Tsuzuki T, Kato M et al (2014) Prognostic value of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens. Prostate 74:680–687CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kato M, Tsuzuki T, Kimura K et al (2016) The presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy is a significant prognostic factor for prostate cancer patients with distant metastasis at initial presentation. Mod Pathol 29:166–173CrossRefPubMed Kato M, Tsuzuki T, Kimura K et al (2016) The presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy is a significant prognostic factor for prostate cancer patients with distant metastasis at initial presentation. Mod Pathol 29:166–173CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zhao T, Liao B, Yao J et al (2015) Is there any prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma of prostate in initial diagnosed aggressively metastatic prostate cancer? Prostate 75:225–232CrossRefPubMed Zhao T, Liao B, Yao J et al (2015) Is there any prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma of prostate in initial diagnosed aggressively metastatic prostate cancer? Prostate 75:225–232CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Morais CL, Han JS, Gordetsky J et al (2015) Utility of PTEN and ERG immunostaining for distinguishing high-grade PIN from intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol 39:169–178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morais CL, Han JS, Gordetsky J et al (2015) Utility of PTEN and ERG immunostaining for distinguishing high-grade PIN from intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol 39:169–178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Risbridger GP, Taylor RA, Clouston D et al (2015) Patient derived xenografts reveal that intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a prominent pathology in BRCA2 mutation carriers with prostate cancer and correlates with poor prognosis. Eur Urol 67:496–503CrossRefPubMed Risbridger GP, Taylor RA, Clouston D et al (2015) Patient derived xenografts reveal that intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a prominent pathology in BRCA2 mutation carriers with prostate cancer and correlates with poor prognosis. Eur Urol 67:496–503CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lindberg J, Kristiansen A, Wiklund P et al (2015) Tracking the origin of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 67:819–822CrossRefPubMed Lindberg J, Kristiansen A, Wiklund P et al (2015) Tracking the origin of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 67:819–822CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin M et al (2016) The 2016 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 40:244–252PubMed Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin M et al (2016) The 2016 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 40:244–252PubMed
11.
go back to reference Humphrey PA, Moch H, Cubilla AL et al (2016) The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part B: prostate and bladder tumours. Eur Urol 70:106–119CrossRefPubMed Humphrey PA, Moch H, Cubilla AL et al (2016) The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part B: prostate and bladder tumours. Eur Urol 70:106–119CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR et al (2004) Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1502–1512CrossRefPubMed Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR et al (2004) Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1502–1512CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH et al (2004) Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1513–1520CrossRefPubMed Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH et al (2004) Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1513–1520CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley, Oxford Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley, Oxford
15.
go back to reference Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I et al (2008) Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol 26:1148–1159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I et al (2008) Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol 26:1148–1159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 65:467–479CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 65:467–479CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tsuzuki T (2015) Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: a comprehensive and updated review. Int J Urol 22:140–145CrossRefPubMed Tsuzuki T (2015) Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: a comprehensive and updated review. Int J Urol 22:140–145CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chen Z, Chen N, Shen P et al (2015) The presence and clinical implication of intraductal carcinoma of prostate in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 75:1247–1254CrossRefPubMed Chen Z, Chen N, Shen P et al (2015) The presence and clinical implication of intraductal carcinoma of prostate in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 75:1247–1254CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Naito S, Tsukamoto T, Koga H et al (2008) Docetaxel plus prednisolone for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a multicenter phase II Trial in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38(5):365–372CrossRefPubMed Naito S, Tsukamoto T, Koga H et al (2008) Docetaxel plus prednisolone for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a multicenter phase II Trial in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38(5):365–372CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD et al (2016) A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur Urol 69:428–435CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD et al (2016) A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur Urol 69:428–435CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of docetaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate
Authors
Akiyuki Yamamoto
Masashi Kato
Hirotaka Matsui
Ryo Ishida
Tohru Kimura
Yasuhito Funahashi
Naoto Sassa
Yoshihisa Matsukawa
Osamu Kamihira
Ryohei Hattori
Momokazu Gotoh
Toyonori Tsuzuki
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1235-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine