Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2016

01-12-2016 | Original Article

Factors predicting efficacy and adverse effects of enzalutamide in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of retrospective multi-institutional study

Authors: Naoki Terada, Shusuke Akamatsu, Yoshiyuki Okada, Hiromitsu Negoro, Takashi Kobayashi, Toshinari Yamasaki, Yoshiyuki Matsui, Takahiro Inoue, Tomomi Kamba, Osamu Ogawa

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aimed to evaluate the factors predicting efficacy and adverse effects of enzalutamide in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated data on 345 patients who had received enzalutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer in 20 hospitals (Kyoto University Hospital and other satellite hospitals). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify factors predicting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression after enzalutamide treatment and logistic regression analysis for those associated with development of adverse effects.

Results

PSA titers decreased by >50 % in 197 patients (57 %). The median PSA progression free survival was 163 days. Gleason score >8 (HR 2.078, 95 % CI 1.37–3.153, P = 0.00058), performance status ≥1 (HR 2.292, 95 % CI 1.463–3.592, P = 0.000296), presence of bone metastasis (HR 1.774, 95 % CI 1.019–3.090, P = 0.0429), visceral metastasis (HR 2.127, 95 % CI 1.215–3.722, P = 0.00823), previous steroid treatment (HR 1.780, 95 % CI 1.207–2.626, P = 0.00361) and docetaxel treatment (HR 1.602, 95 % CI 1.051–2.442, P = 0.0284) significantly predicted the efficacy of enzalutamide. Adverse effects, including fatigue or appetite loss, occurred in 169 patients (49 %), 48 (18 %) of whom stopped enzalutamide. Age >75 years (HR 1.980, 95 % CI 1.270–3.09, P = 0.00246) and lower enzalutamide dose (HR 0.437, 95 % CI 0.255–1.270, P = 0.00249) were significantly associated with development of adverse effects.

Conclusions

Enzalutamide treatment is effective in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer with low Gleason scores, good performance status, without bone or visceral metastasis and no prior steroid or docetaxel treatment. Lower doses of enzalutamide decrease the incidence of adverse effects, especially in older patients.
Literature
9.
go back to reference Goodman OB Jr, Flaig TW, Molina A et al (2014) Exploratory analysis of the visceral disease subgroup in a phase III study of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 17(1):34–39. doi:10.1038/pcan.2013.41 CrossRefPubMed Goodman OB Jr, Flaig TW, Molina A et al (2014) Exploratory analysis of the visceral disease subgroup in a phase III study of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 17(1):34–39. doi:10.​1038/​pcan.​2013.​41 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Metadata
Title
Factors predicting efficacy and adverse effects of enzalutamide in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of retrospective multi-institutional study
Authors
Naoki Terada
Shusuke Akamatsu
Yoshiyuki Okada
Hiromitsu Negoro
Takashi Kobayashi
Toshinari Yamasaki
Yoshiyuki Matsui
Takahiro Inoue
Tomomi Kamba
Osamu Ogawa
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1004-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2016 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Prevalence of data fraud

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine